Related stories:
OKLAHOMA CITY — Some opponents of Common Core apparently have now turned their guns on Advanced Placement courses.
People are also reading…
The legality of teaching Advanced Placement courses in Oklahoma public schools was raised Monday during a House Common Education Committee hearing on a bill aimed at the AP U.S. history guidelines.
That measure, House Bill 1380, by Rep. Dan Fisher, R-Yukon, would direct the state Board of Education to review those guidelines and bar the use of state funds for AP U.S. history courses.
During discussion and debate, however, it was suggested that AP courses are similar to Common Core, in that they could be construed as an attempt to impose a national curriculum on American schools.
It was also suggested that AP courses violate the legislation approved last year that repealed Common Core, with state Rep. Sally Kern, R-Oklahoma City, saying she has asked the state Attorney General’s Office for a ruling on the matter.
That legislation gives sole control of curriculum and assessment to the state, although it was not immediately clear whether the requirement applies to all courses or only to required courses.
Although HB 1380 specifically targets U.S. history, a ruling that it violates state law related to curriculum and assessment could apply to all AP courses.
Advanced Placement is a nationally recognized series of courses and tests developed by the College Board, a private entity, with the assistance of high school and college faculty, that allows high school students to earn college credit. It is not required for high school graduation, and public schools do not have to offer it.
Fisher, who has been active in a church-and-state organization called the Black Robe Regiment, said the AP U.S. history course framework emphasizes “what is bad about America.”
Larry Krieger, a teacher who spoke to the committee via conference call, implied that the AP framework was created by some of the same people responsible for Common Core.
Both said the framework omits the concept of “American exceptionalism.”
The framework has come under fire in several states, including Texas and South Carolina.
John Williamson, representing the College Board, said Fisher’s and Krieger’s objections are “mythology and not true.”
He said the course is intended for students who have already mastered “foundational” American history and are capable of university-level work.
He said the framework lays out seven pages of “thematic learning objectives” but gives individual teachers considerable leeway in arriving at those objectives.
Williamson read three of the learning objectives he said support the concept of American exceptionalism.
The framework and a sample test are available online at collegeboard.org.
The bill passed 11-4, with all Republican members in favor and all Democrats opposed.
HB 1380 was only one of several contentious issues tackled by the Common Education Committee during a three-hour, 10-minute meeting Monday.
The committee also discussed and debated at length HB 2003, by Rep. Jason Nelson, R-Oklahoma City. The bill would establish what are called “education savings accounts” but which essentially would be state-funded vouchers for low-income students to attend private schools.
The amount of the vouchers would vary according to household income but in no case would exceed 90 percent of state and local per-pupil funding.
But not even Speaker Jeff Hickman, R-Fairview, casting a rare vote for the bill as an ex officio member of the committee, could get HB 2003 out of the committee. Five Republicans joined the four Democrats in voting against it to leave the bill one vote shy of advancing.
The bill could be heard again next week.
The committee did approve measures delaying full implementation of the Teacher Leader Effectiveness Assessment and temporarily suspending the A-F school grading system.
Related stories: