Elsevier

Leukemia Research

Volume 38, Issue 3, March 2014, Pages 323-328
Leukemia Research

The lower peripheral blood lymphocyte/monocyte ratio assessed during routine follow-up after standard first-line chemotherapy is a risk factor for predicting relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2013.12.005Get rights and content

Abstract

A specific predictor during routine follow-up to ascertain risk for relapse after standard first-line chemotherapy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has not been identified, although blood counts, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and imaging studies, such as computed tomography (CT) scans or positron emission tomography, have been recommended. Therefore, we studied the absolute lymphocyte count/absolute monocyte count ratio (ALC/AMC ratio) as a marker of poststandard first-line chemotherapy for predicting relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). 220 consecutive DLBCL patients, originally diagnosed, treated with CHOP or R-CHOP and followed up at two institutions. ALC/AMC ratio was obtained at the time of confirmed relapse or last follow-up. Patients at the time of confirmed relapse (n = 163) had a lower ALC/AMC ratio compared with those at last follow-up (n = 57) (P < 0.001). ALC/AMC ratio at the time of confirmed relapse was a strong predictor for relapse with an area under the curve = 0.813 (P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity for ALC/AMC ratio at the time of confirmed relapse or at last follow-up were 68.1% and 87.7%, respectively, and the relative risk of relapse with an ALC/AMC ratio < 2.8 at the time of confirmed relapse or at last follow-up was 1.845 with an odds ratio of 15.247 (95% cumulative incidence: 6.473–35.916) after CHOP or R-CHOP in DLBCL. Patients with an ALC/AMC ratio (<2.8) had a higher cumulative hazard rate of relapse compared with an ALC/AMC ratio (≥2.8) (P < 0.001). This study suggests that the lower ALC/AMC ratio can be used as a marker to assess risk of DLBCL relapse during routine follow-up after standard first-line chemotherapy.

Introduction

Despite recent major advances in treating diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with dose-intense regimens and the addition of the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, a significant proportion of patients will experience disease relapse, mainly during the first two years after completing therapy [1]. A primary aim of follow-up is to detect early relapse, with the hope of improving outcome following salvage chemotherapy. The current recommendation for long-term follow-up in patients with DLBCL, who are not participating in clinical trials, by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a follow-up every 3–6 months or as clinically indicated [2]. The European Society of Medical Oncology's recommendations for follow-up in NHL include follow-up every 3 months for 1 years, every 6 months for 2 years and then once a year [3].

Risk factors used to assess clinical outcomes in DLBCL patients treated with standard therapy are identified before treatment implementation, such as the international prognostic index (IPI) [4], gene expression profiling [5] or immunohistochemistry-based detection of prognostic biomarkers [6], [7]. Even though these risk factors are useful to guide physicians in the identification of patients who would benefit from standard therapy, a limitation of these is that they are tested at one point in time [8]. An inexpensive factor that could be monitored during follow-up after standard therapy and predicts relapse would be needed to help to identify patients who might require further evaluation for relapse. In DLBCL, LDH has been reported to have a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 85% to predict relapse during follow-up [9]. Recently, absolute lymphocyte count/absolute monocyte count ratio (ALC/AMC ratio) at diagnosis, as a simple biomarker combining an estimate of host immune homeostasis and tumor microenvironment, was recently shown to be an independent prognostic indicator in DLBCL [10] and HL [11], [12], [13]. However, to our best knowledge, there is no data available on whether ALC/AMC ratio can help in detecting relapse. Thus, we set out to evaluate the prognostic value of peripheral ALC/AMC ratio at follow-up as a marker to assess relapse during follow-up.

Section snippets

Patient

To participate in this study, consecutive 220 patients with DLBCL who were evaluated and treated with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) or R-CHOP (rituximab-cyclophosphamide, hydroxydaunorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) were followed up at the first affiliated hospital and the second hospital of Anhui Medical University between the years 2001 and 2011. Patients with primary DLBCL central nervous system lymphoma, transformed NHL, positive human

Patient characteristics

A total of 220 patients in this study, median follow-up following diagnosis was 36 months, had full information of the relapse (n = 163) or at last follow-up (n = 57). The median age for this cohort was 54 years (range: 13–84 years). The distribution of additional baseline characteristics for these patients is presented in Table 1. At diagnosis, the median AMC was 440/μl (interquartile range: 310–600) and the median ALC was 1320/μl (interquartile range: 1100–1792); at the time of confirmed relapse (

Discussion

The current risk factors used to assess prognosis in DLBCL patients are identified before treatment [4], [5], [6], [7]. An ideal risk factor is a risk factor that has the ability to predict not only future clinical outcomes but also clinical outcome at any given time point after therapy. So, recently, lymphopenia assessed during routine follow-up was found to be a risk factor for predicting early relapse in patients with DLBCL [8], [18]. Moreover, recent work, based on gene expression profiling

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the key technology projects of Anhui Province of China (no. 11010402168) and the project of National Natural Scientific Research Fund of China (no. 81141104).

Contributions: YLL designed the study, collected the clinical data, performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. KSG, YYP and YJ participated in the collection of the clinical data. ZMZ conceived of the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the

References (28)

  • A. Rosenwald et al.

    The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • L.F. Porrata et al.

    Lymphopenia assessed during routine follow-up after immunochemotherapy (R-CHOP) is a risk factor for predicting relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

    Leukemia

    (2010)
  • J.C. Weeks et al.

    Value of follow-up procedures in patients with large-cell lymphoma who achieves a complete remission

    J Clin Oncol

    (1991)
  • Z.M. Li et al.

    Blood lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio identifies high-risk patients in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP

    PLoS ONE

    (2012)
  • Cited by (20)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text