Jennifer Aniston wasn’t wearing her ring this week, but it was ‘just being cleaned’

FFN_Aniston_Jenn_PABLO_102814_51570129

As soon as Deadline announced that Jennifer Aniston’s “possible Oscar contender” film Cake had found a distributor, Aniston “somehow” managed to get pap’d in LA. I’m including some of the blurry photos we have access to, but you can see some better-quality X17 photos here. I glanced at the photos yesterday, but I didn’t really care about them because they were so blurry and poor quality. But it seems like the Aniston-loonies poured over the photos and noticed that something was missing: Aniston’s engagement ring. Just FYI: Aniston’s ringlessness was NOT being covered on any of the sites I read yesterday. But Aniston’s publicist still wanted to give everyone an engagement update!

Jennifer Aniston was spotted out and about in Los Angeles earlier today, and everyone freaked out. And no, it wasn’t because of her always gorgeous hair, or her latest designer duds…this time, it was all about one suspiciously missing accessory: her engagement ring.

The actress sparked speculation that there was something fishy going on between her and her fiancé, Justin Theroux, after she was seen without the diamond sparkler. But fret not, you guys. It turns out that all is well in the Aniston-Theroux household.

In fact, the A-lister’s rep had a perfectly good explanation for why she stepped out sans bling.

“Everyone should calm down—the ring was just being cleaned and is safely back on her hand.”

Well then…glad that’s settled.

[From E! News]

Sigh… I go back and forth about Aniston’s PR. Does she want us to speculate about the state of her engagement? Does she want us to talk about Justin Theroux’s cold feet? Did she step out without her ring on purpose so that her rep could deny the “rumors”? I have no idea if all of this is so vapidly Machiavellian. But I do know that I still think her rock looks like a cheap, cloudy quartz. I’m going to need to see the receipts on this diamond.

This is Aniston flashing her quartz a few weeks ago:

FFN_Aniston_Jennifer_PRROFF13_exc_100914_51553917

Photos courtesy of Fame/Flynet.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

102 Responses to “Jennifer Aniston wasn’t wearing her ring this week, but it was ‘just being cleaned’”

Comments are Closed

We close comments on older posts to fight comment spam.

  1. Kiddo says:

    Justin’s cold feet tired of Jen’s emoting nips? What did the surprised brow think of it all? What will Cindy Crawford’s gossipy mole say, that they were not equals, and that Jen’s nips made Justin’s feet feel stupid? Tune in for the next Soap Episode of Celebrity Parts.

  2. PunkyMomma says:

    A poorly cut quartz, at that.

    • pookah says:

      It reminds me of a Hall’s Eucalyptus Cough Drop.

      • Size Does Matter says:

        lol at the cough drop – spot on

        It only takes me about two minutes to clean my ring with a toothbrush.

    • Sal says:

      Yes it is absolutely hideous! It looks cheap and gaudy, something like you’d get in a $1 lucky dip at a school fair.

    • Alice says:

      Chances are, that diamond ring is an antique, or the stone has been pulled from one. It’s probably an old mine cut stone which would actually give it a lot more personality than the obsiquious round brilliant cuts of today. Which, while they’re pretty and sparkly, all kind of look the same. Meh…

      The older cuts are quite in demand these days as they’re hard to find (lots get recut to modern proportions) and there are more than a few people out there who want something a bit different. And as the old cuts predate the whole “blood diamond/funding African civil wars” period, you can be sure they aren’t one. If you’ve ever seen the British (and other countries) crown jewels, most of the diamonds in them are old mine cut stones.

      As for cloudy, I’d put good money on that diamond having a fair amount of blue UV flourescence, something fairly common in diamonds. My eyes and your’s wouldn’t pick it up as cloudy looking (it would just look extra white), but the camera doesn’t process fluorescence in the same way as eyes do.

    • BoredAndExtremelyDangerous says:

      I agree, SieDoesMatter.
      1: It’s nearly 2015 FFS. It takes the jewellers in my local shopping centre five minutes to give my engagement ring a professional clean and check for loose settings etc, and I can give mine a really decent clean in two minutes, too.

      2: It’s such a gaudy bit of tat that she should leave it off more often. In this case, bigger does not make it better or classier.

  3. Gina says:

    I completely agree with you on the ring…cheap cloudy quartz is a perfect description. Sadly I think there will be more spotting without the ring because I just don’t see this relationship lasting.

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      I seriously hate that ring. Jennifer has MONEY. If she wanted a giant ring, there are ways she could’ve done it, and made it look fabulous. Elizabeth Taylor, Taylor-Burton style amazing. If it had been taken down two or three sizes, and had been flanked by maybe an amber or yellow colored stone on each side, then it would’ve been a beautiful engagement ring, despite the cloudiness of the diamond.

      And I don’t understand why her ring is so big either. She hardly ever wears jewelry. She wears little rings (no big stones), chain necklaces with a charm or two, and that’s about it. I do remember those tacky name rings that she and Justin started wearing, right after Uncle Terry did their “We’re so in lurve!” rollout photos, but other than that? I don’t see how this ring is her style. I didn’t like her first engagement/wedding ring, but at least it looks like some effort went into the design–engagement ring #2 looks like someone plopped the biggest diamond they could find on a skinny gold band.

  4. Suzy from Ontario says:

    I’m so tired of the whole Jennifer Aniston wedding stuff…is it on or off? I mean, they aren’t super young or poor. What are they waiting for? If you didn’t want to get married, then don’t bother, but why even get engaged then? I mean, if it’s about the jewelry, then buy some nice jewelry, but this loooooooong engagement is ridiculous. Either you want to get married or you don’t, period.

    • Beep says:

      meh, maybe it’s just not a priority for them. My fiance and I have been engaged for over 10 years. Sometimes the engagement is enough. Everyone is different. I don’t get why the length of their engagement would matter to anybody but them.

      • Betty says:

        I’m just curious why the engagement would be enough when the goal of an engagement is marriage. I’m not being snarky. I just don’t understand. To me an engagement is just a planning period for the wedding. I had a very short (three-month) engagement, so the idea of a years-long engagment feels totally foreign to me.

      • LaurieH says:

        I am with Beep. I have been engaged 7 years and have no immediate plans to get married. It’s a personal thing, I guess. Some people are content with ringed commitment. Like Jen, I was married before when I was younger. Divorce makes some of us gun shy. Plus, it’s different when you’re older. There will be no kids or any of the usual fairytale stuff. In fact, for me, getting married would just make y taxes go up. So…I dunno. I don’t judge long (or even permanent) engagements.

    • Nicole says:

      Brangelina was no better. They have played their engagement and wedding for years. No big difference. I guess is a common thing in celeb world. They are milking these stories until the last drop.

      • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

        Except they didn’t. They ‘announced’ their engagement when Angelina wore the ring at a museum (they’d been engaged Christmas 2011 and announced it April 2012). Angelina hadn’t done a film since 2010–Brad was gearing up for WWZ promotions. He talked about the engagement in PEOPLE when he was promoting Killing Them Softly (said that it would be soon), and was asked about wedding plans during the WWZ promotions. To which he said it would be soon and that he was in charge of napkins. There was a hoopla about Angelina not wearing her engagement ring to Ecuador, and when she wore a gold band instead of her ring while on her humanitarian trips. When she was promoting Maleficent, she talked about her wedding (in Elle, I think) and said that they understood that they understood there was public interest, because they were public people. And then, of course, she was asked about it on RC’s for Maleficent. They gave very few, if any details about their wedding, throughout their engagement.

        Except if you’re referring to when they said they wouldn’t get married until everyone could get married (when asked if they were going to get married), and then the press continually asking them about it every once in a while–and Brad saying a few times that he wouldn’t be able to hold out marrying Angelina, because of their kids. Is that what you mean?

        And the issue with Jennifer/Justin’s engagement is that they started out playing PR games. Went to the Oscars; got the cover of PEOPLE about their wedding details–Jennifer on the front cover, good shot of her Oscar dress and engagement ring–and then had another cover about how they weren’t getting married because they were busy…then refuting that in interviews (Jennifer saying that nothing had been planned, etc). And then, as soon as Justin gets a job that requires him to be in his favoritest city EVER, they are nowhere to be seen with each other–except when a red carpet requires it. And then Justin saying (after being asked about their ‘long’ engagement) that ‘we’ were more excited about the wedding than ‘they’ were, and that he had ‘hot feet’–which I don’t think he knows what hot feet means, but whatevs.

      • maddelina says:

        I agree! My brother and his fiance are getting married in the spring after twenty five years together. It’s a personal decision for them.

      • pookah says:

        Please explain how these stories are similar. Let’s get this straight: Brad and Angelina are in no way comparable to Aniston and her formerly unknown poseur douche. They are only rivals in your and Jennifer Aniston’s imaginations. I can guarantee you.

        For everyone else on the planet, they have little to do with each other – neither their circumstances, station in life or their relationships are similar. One is well on it’s way to being a legendary Hollywood love story (correction: they are already), and one is not even a very good after school special.

        One couple have said they are committed for life, and will grow old together paper or no paper, and having been together for a decade already, and having six children together, that appears to be more than true – they said a piece of paper won’t make them any more committed and that they’d get married when everyone could OR if their kids grew up and started asking them to do so. The kids did, so they got engaged in 2012, and after major surgery and two very busy careers acting/directing/producing and just overall, being the biggest stars in the world that they are – they tied the knot this summer.

        The OTHER couple, consisting of a former tv sit-com actress from the nineties, and her no-name poseur bald dude who desperately wants to be famous, and doesn’t mind hooking up with ‘poor Jen,’ to do it….coincidentally (yeah, riiiiiight) decided to get engaged not even a couple weeks after their imagined rivals, the most famous movie stars in the world did. They THEN, hijacked the Oscars People Cover with their deets on the dress and wedding when they THOUGHT Brad and Angelina were getting hitched the same weekend, THEN, when their imagined rivals didn’t tie the knot as expected, and they were left holding the bag…and had to issue retractions about the People Mag breathless fake wedding story and give excuses that no one (not even People rag themselves) believed.

        Unlike the so in love movie star couple, these two are never together, they have LOADS of free time, they live on opposite ends of the country thousands of miles apart, and only seem to regroup for a red carpet pap walk, or some other photo op event.

        It seems to be a very dry, chemistry-less, contractual relationship designed to make her look less pathetic in the wake of Brangelina nuptials, and get him a more high profile name recognition that at 45, had eluded him his entire career.

        So no, Aniston and her business co-hort, are not like Naomi and Liv, not like Brad and Angie, not like Kurt and Goldie, or any other in love committed partners living their lives TOGETHER.

        Nice try though.

      • The Original G says:

        Actually, I think the truth is more like no one cares about the precise marital status of this entire quartet and the Huvane inspired middle-age repertory farce.

        Except, perhaps, some minivan moms trying to desperately grow out the impulsive bob haircut that ruined their Christmas last year.

      • Sal says:

        Lol pookah I think you are my new favourite poster! I couldn’t agree more with you.

      • Dallas says:

        Oh, Pookah…. You have got it BAD!! Breathe! Bitter is not attractive.

        .

        Someone saw Aniston out yesterday without her engagement ring on. Some agency called her PR team and asked about it, and a press release was issued. Had no one called her PR agency, no release would have been issued. PR 101!!

        .

        Unlike another couple, neither of them are each other’s Baby Mama or Baby Daddy. They don’t have 6 kids TOGETHER nor, have they been together for 10 years. So who cares how long they are engaged?

        .

        And as far as her ring is concerned, at least her jeweler didn’t have to make a donation to a Foundation to receive the business . It’s hers, she likes it, let it go!

      • Sal says:

        Dallas, why bring up the other couple? You must be exhausted having to defend Aniston so much. Angelina and Brad are PARENTS, not ‘Baby mama or baby daddy’. MOTHER and FATHER. And what does that or how long they’ve been together have anything to do with anything? DESPERATE, much? At least the other couple DID have the jeweller donate to charity. Something Aniston wouldn’t think to do. Seriously, bitter is not attractive, and you have it bad when it comes to hating the JPs. Let it go and get over it. Spend your time defending someone WORTH defending, not a self-absorbed charity-hating piece of trash who had to destroy a 14 year relationship to get a man.

      • The Original G says:

        Yes, I send out press releases when I have my jewelry cleaned as well. To announce car washes and the pick up of dry cleaning, I skip the press release and go straight to all my social media platforms.

      • Dallas says:

        Sal, I didn’t bring the other couple into this thread. All you JP fans, who love to crucify her and keep the triangle alive, did.

        .

        Not defending, just stating facts….

      • Sal says:

        Check again. It wasn’t a JP fan. The only ones who continue to bring up JPs are the Anistonloons who love to crucify Angelina for some imagined crime, just to justify their defence of Aniston.

        And sorry, but nothing you stated were ‘facts’. All lies. Try again. Maybe start with learning the dictionary definition of the word ‘fact’. You will find the antonyms are ‘lies’ and ‘opinion’.

      • Paige says:

        Dallas, calling pookah bitter but your comment about an obvious couple is so snarky and pretty bitter. Btw, it’s an opinion not a “fact”

      • Mallory says:

        Many people get facts and opinions confused.

    • Jessica says:

      Jen & Justin had an engagement cover, a wedding plans cover, the wedding plans are on hold cover and I’m pretty sure there are many more to come. How many covers do they need, before even having the actual wedding?

    • Falkor says:

      Jennifer seems like the kind of person who would much prefer to keep things casual in relationships and would be unhappy with kids in the picture. There is not a damn thing wrong with those traits in and of themselves. The issue is that her fanbase has very different expectations of what her life and motivations should be about. She is stuck in an endless cycle of “playing the game” by pandering to these people. It’s for the sake of PR, but how is this benefiting her on a psychological level? I don’t think she has the intellect to evaluate the psychic cost of the charade that is her life. She’s dimwitted and incurious and that inhibits introspection.

      • Nikita says:

        Well, if shes really casual, why does she needs such a big ugly ring? i would have never expected that she would like such a decadent huge ring. And i would have never thougt that Justin (if he even bought it) would think that she likes a big ring like this.
        Her casual “natural” image is just that, a image! She drives a bentley. very casual 😉
        I dont think that anything in Jennifers life is casual.

      • Falkor says:

        I think she would prefer casual relationships, she doesn’t actually have any though because PR will always come first for her. And I didn’t say she’s casual in life, just that she would probably be happier in a relationship that didn’t involve much commitment. Her world seems to revolve around her and I think attachments like a husband would fuck with her me time–huge turn off for her. I thing the ring suits her well, it’s dull and doesn’t have much personality.

      • Janet says:

        Nikita, after Angie flashed that 10-carat bling ring on her left finger, do you really think Aniston was going to be satisfied with anything less?

      • Mallory says:

        True, Janet. Just one-upping that’s what it was.

  5. Jaderu says:

    I would feel really sorry for Jen if her engagement was broken and she was left once again all alone. So much so that I would nominate her for an Oscar.

    Ok and now for my nice version.
    Oh bullshit. She just took off a ring. I wouldn’t lug around a heavy rock all the time either. Not that I ever got a huge rock or nuffin. *side eyes Mr. Jaderu*

    • pookah says:

      I have a feeling this might be part of her PR flack’s plan: stage a sad, sorrowful break up, on the eve of her desperately trying to get noticed during awards season – and pray that between the greasing of palms, and returning of PR flack favors, some voting committee somewhere will give her enough sympathy votes that she could at least score a Golden Globe’ ‘lead comedy actress in a film’ vote, and get a nomination…giving her an excuse to partake in at least one aspect of awards season.

      Okay, I’m calling it – I have a feeling the holidays are coming and they (Aniston and Theroux) do not plan to indulge in more fakery that even they probably can’t even stomach at this point – so Aniston and her PR guy will eventually give some sob story to the press in a month or so, painting Jen as forlorn but strong and persevering, and hope that there are enough sad cows voting on boards to get her a ticket to some kind of awards show as a nominee. If that fails, she and her PR guy will hope against hope that resurrecting her ‘dumped Jen once again’ manufactured pity party affects probable nominees Jolie and Pitt.

    • starrywonder says:

      I know I just roll my eyes that movie and her roll is not an Oscar contender at all. I wish everyone would quit flapping their gums about it. There are so many great performances this year, and everyone saying she is now in the hunt for Best Actress keeps making me laugh. She may get a gold nomination but since I roll my eyes at them for just trying to pack in actors/actresses to show up on tv I don’t hold my breath on her getting a nom for them means anything.

      We have a year where Julianne Moore rocks it in Still Alice, Rosamund Pike played Amy to perfection in Gone Girl, Felicity Jones is getting raves for The Theory of Everything and Jennifer Aniston didn’t wash her hair and had a fake scar. Whatever to her.

    • Mallory says:

      I wouldn’t feel sorry for her. What comes around goes around – she deserves to feel the pain Heidi went through. No one should have the right to build their happiness on someone else’s pain.

  6. Suzy from Ontario says:

    Plus I was just thinking the other day that Jennifer Aniston would be nothing if she hadn’t married Brad Pitt. That is the only reason she is on magazine covers and getting movies. None of her co=stars on Friends are still relevent, or at least not very much. She’s not that talented. She’s okay but there’s are dozens of actresses like her. She is rich because of the split and magazines and paps follow her because she used to be Mrs. Brad Pitt. That’s it. Imagine her life if that hadn’t happened. Jennifer who?

    • FingerBinger says:

      Nope. She was famous and doing movies before Brad Pitt. Friends made her extremely popular and rich. Marrying and divorcing Pitt just made more people talk about her.

      • lea says:

        Well she would not be this famous if not for Brad. No way.
        Her film work would not have been enough to keep her in the press.
        Without her failed marriage why would people care about her life?

        All she has is her hair and yoga routine to talk about.

        Lisa and Courtney are both more talented and live more interesting lives. Courtney pre surgery was so beautiful.

      • maddelina says:

        If she were only famous for being Pitt’s wife she wouldn’t have lasted this long in the public eye or movies. She has a fan base like it or not.

      • lea says:

        A lot of her fanbase is teenagers obsessed with Friends or her hair. Her Friends fan base may be large, but her film fanbase is not. Fans do not show up in droves for her films, case in point Life of Crime made less than $300,000.

        She has a fan base that photo shops her into recent pics of Brad with kids!! They photoshop out AJ and stick Aniston’s head in! A fan base on FF that spends more time obsessing over Angelina than talking about Aniston.

      • Josephine says:

        The career is all hers, but I think the tabloid fodder stems from the divorce. She is interesting because of her perceived notion of being the wronged woman of two very powerful actors, one of which folks love to hate. In no way am I entering the debate as to whether she milks that image, but I do think that there isn’t much else that is interesting about her. She leads a pretty clean and boring life. Sure, she would get PR around movie releases, but I think she gets substantially more attention that her career would suggest.

      • Sal says:

        Absolute bullshit! If it weren’t for Pitt she would have disappeared like the other 5. She’d have gone the way Lisa Kudrow and the others did. This PROVES it was ONLY her marriage to Pitt that made her a household name. Just accept reality. Without THE Brad Pitt marrying her, and her subsequent stalking and coattailing the JPs and trying to one-up them all the time, she’d be an ex sitcom nobody.

        That’s reality. Just accept it.

  7. Virgilia Coriolanus says:

    I’m so glad that we got this crucial update…….I mean, we get all these stories/rumors about how Jennifer and Justin are breaking up because they *cough* live thousands of miles apart, on opposite ends of the country, yet the minute Jennifer is seen without her engagement ring (for whatever reason that only matters to HER–not like we peasants needed an explanation) for a few pictures, there needs to be some kind of response. Official, Huvane-is-on-this-mother response. Okay.

    I mean, would it have been that hard to IGNORE the rumors (that cropped up for all of two minutes, because I only read about them yesterday), and just put your ring on whenever you wanted? It’s not like married/engaged people have to keep their rings on all the time. You know how often my mom takes her ring off to cook something, and doesn’t put it back on for a few days? Hint: A lot.

    • pookah says:

      Except the one time she went without her ring during her then rumored marriage troubles and break with Brad Pitt, her PR flack gave the same sort of lame excuse – it turned out he was lying and she and Pitt really had split. It was Nov 2004.

  8. Kim1 says:

    Next week @Eonline
    Jen is not pregnant her stomach appeared bigger because she is constipated.But her hair extensions are still gorgeous.She is still beautiful and very much in love with Justin.

  9. HughJass says:

    The ring has to be sent away for cleaning? like a rug? Cleaning my engagement ring involved going into the jewelry store, handing them the ring, and waiting around like 5-10 minutes. Then leaving, with my ring back on my hand.

    • RobN says:

      Not that it matters, but I’d guess the insurance company with a policy on this ring requires yearly cleanings and checks on it’s condition with a letter sent back to the company. It’s not going to be the same as wandering into the jewelry store in the mall and having them stick it in the sonic thing for a couple of minutes.

    • pookah says:

      Thank you. Also, if what RobN said were true, we’d get constant pap photos and tabloid/blog stories about the missing rings of engaged/married celebrities, and there would be a constant stream of ‘cleaning’ denials by PR douches, just like this one. If it’s that routine that rich ladies send out for elaborate ring cleanings supervised a lot of people would be walking around ringless….but they are not.

      • Mallory says:

        True. The fact that Aniston’s publicist even bothered to answer in a press release about something so trivial and superficial says everything about her and her need for attention; any way she can get it.

      • The Original G says:

        It’s not the absence of her ring. It’s the absence of her finance.

  10. minx says:

    She just sets my teeth on edge.

  11. lea says:

    How long does it take to clean a cheap looking ring? Is it a common thing to leave your ring somewhere to be cleaned?

    Everything she does is so calculated. And does her pr team really need to reply to every rumor about her? They should learn to ignore it because no one cares the next day.

    • Janet says:

      You can buy one of those sonic things and clean it at home. Or just buy a bottle of jewelry cleaner for $4.95, dunk the ring in, give it 20 to 30 good shakes, and it comes out clean as new.

    • Camille (The Original) says:

      Spot on lea

    • Mallory says:

      There are 2 types of celebs: those who ignore most if not all gossip about them, and those that have to address every single rumor in a press release. Almost no other celeb addresses every….single…..rumor like Jennifer Aniston does. She draws attention to it all by clarifying or denying everything. Most mature celebs don’t dignify any comments like that. She is a desperate famewhore who is famous FOR being famous.

  12. Rena says:

    Guess HB2 PR campaign is beginning. Ring-gate is the opening salvo. Will be hearing lots about her Cake Oscar speculation as well. Bulldog Huvane is ready and his very well paid on the job status is greenlit LOL.

  13. Falkor says:

    Oh thank the lord, let the romance of the ages continue then!

  14. Gina says:

    There are plenty of pictures that show it’s not quartz. It’s way too big for my taste, but it probably didn’t come cheap.

    https://alsonjewelers.wordpress.com/2013/03/02/top-ten-celebrity-engagement-rings/

    • Virgilia Coriolanus says:

      I think the point is that it doesn’t look like a quality diamond–and it probably would look better, imo, if it was 2-3 sizes smaller, with a color jewel flanking it (I think either amber, yellow, or a deep red would look great).

    • Rena says:

      Either the unknown jeweler did not know how to set this diamond properly or the diamond was poorly cut. Cushion cuts are an older cut now very popular as they are usually extra brilliant in appearance and do not look cloudy and occluded like her ring, it has no sparkle. It is like the size was more important that the overall ring appearance and presentation. Not my cup of tea.

      • Janet says:

        Nor mine. I’ve seen cushion cut diamonds in Harry Winston and they are glorious. Mad flash and sparkle. This ring looks dull and clouded. It looks like she sacrificed quality for quantity and just ended up with a cheap-looking ring.

      • KAI says:

        The lack of sparkle is not because the diamond is cushion shaped but because it is rose cut or possibly mine cut. Neither are optimal for sparkle. It may also be a lower colour, perhaps I or J.

      • The Original G says:

        It’s not a cushion cut. It’s a vintage rose cut and likely a vintage ring.

      • Dallas says:

        Have you seen it up close and personally? Other than photographed? That’s what I thought….

      • Erm says:

        A rose cut diamond is actually less sparkly than other cuts. The rose cut was used to retain as much of the carat weight as possible, but not to showcase sparkle or fire. This is why the rose cut fell out of favour for a long time.

    • maddelina says:

      I think they’re all gaudy. I don’t even wear mine, just the band.

  15. Tippy says:

    You can’t even tell that thing was hit by the Titanic.

    Being Jennifer Aniston’s publicist must be the easiest job in the world.

  16. Kate2 says:

    Good lord. This woman can’t even get her ring cleaned without getting jumped on. I really need to stop clicking on these stories.

    • Bee says:

      She is not being attacked at all. Her pr tactics and attention craving ways are being attacked.
      She seems so calculated about everything.

      Calls the paps, does not wear her ring, ensures that the paps will get a pic of ringless finger (even though she knows people will notice and question why no ring), has her publicist release a statement about why she is not wearing her ring to ensure more media coverage.

      A ring being cleaned is just a silly excuse, even if true why respond at all. She needs to learn to ignore tabloid stories and stop having Huvane respond to everything.

    • Gina says:

      I rarely bother anymore either. The vitriol this woman incites astounds me. People complained she was too pap-happy, so she’s kept a really low profile lately, but they still hate her. People complained she’s boring, always Rachel, so she’s trying out different roles, people still hate her.

      People were actually outraged yesterday that there’s mere talk of her getting an Oscar nomination, like it would tarnish the very fabric of the academy. Seriously, Renée Zellweger got a nod for Bridget Jones’s Diary and Whoopi won for Ghost. The bar isn’t that high.

      • Bee says:

        The “hate” you think she gets is nothing compared to other celebs. Go to the Female First Forums and see the nasty hate Angelina and their kids get.

        The outrage is over her pr team’s need to talk about Cake as if she is winning an Oscar. When in reality no one wanted Cake and the producers have to self distribute. The review of her performance are not raves, they are average reviews and her publicist is releasing stories to make people think she gives this career defining performance.

        Renee actually has talent and won an Oscar. Whoopi is more talented than Jen as well.

    • Candy Love says:

      What are you talking about? First of all no one or other bloge had even mentioned or notest her missing ring. Her PR person is the one that pointed it out that she wasn’t wearing one and it was being cleaned so of course people are going to question the motive behind that.

      • Sal says:

        Agreed, any criticism of Jennifer Aniston and her fans gets upset. They smear an innocent woman who has never done a thing to hurt anyone, and her children, for nigh on 10 years, and after having an easy ride Aniston gets a tiny bit of the medicine back; the Anistonloonies squeal like stuck pigs. They are effen hypocrites. Its ABOUT TIME Aniston got some of the hate, slurs, smears, lies and death threats Angelina got, especially since Aniston caused all this.

      • SunnyD says:

        I am mainly a lurker on these boards and am Team nobody in this debate but I have to say I’m shocked by the vitriol for a woman (Aniston) I’m assuming most people commenting have never met. Views on celebrities people haven’t met are just that, not facts, so I’m baffled by what seem to be such rabidly held opinions.

  17. The Original G says:

    Like she goes to 7-11 with a million dollar ring on. As if. She surely wears a replica for day to day wear.

  18. ann says:

    On Daily Mail, there are about three pictures of her left hand holding her hair in different positions on her head. She’s a little long in the tooth for placing her purse on her tummy, and she just went braless in a sheer dress not that long ago, so now she has to stay relevant by going without her engagement ring. Too bad it’s working.

    • Dallas says:

      “Long in the tooth”? Every female should look that good at her age! Here is hoping you do…

      • Sal says:

        She really means that much to you, huh, Dallas? Get a grip! You have it bad. And honey, for 3 nose jobs, numerous plastic surgeries, blue contacts, bleached hair, etc, for all that MONEY she spends, so she damn well should look ok at her age. Its called money and erasing every bit of your Greek features.

      • ann says:

        Dallas, relax. I meant she’s just getting a little too old at her age to be pulling the prego rumours she puts out there. In what part did I say anything about her looks? You’re looking for a fight about something I never even came close to implying.

      • Kim1 says:

        Well a 60 year old woman gave birth so don’t give up on Jen quite yet

      • ann says:

        Well Kim1, I guess we’ll be seeing a few more years of purse to tummy poses. lol

  19. Noushin says:

    Dear Jen, Many congratulations on your Oscar film Cake. Wishing you all the best forever.

  20. Anguishedcorn says:

    I take my ring to the Jewelers to be cleaned… Takes about 10 minutes, enough for me to run next door for a coffee. Just sayin.

    • Karen says:

      My ring was cleaned in 10 minutes at my jeweler. All rings are cleaned the same way and I have seen some huge ones at my jeweler. Jennifer’s ring is quite ugly-cloudy and dark. Don’t know what she was thinking when she picked out and gave it to Justin to give to her. My guess is isince the engagement, they have had quarterly meetups. December is Cabo. March is Oscar parties. June film opening. Sept film festival. He is probably contracted for 25-30 days per year. She didn’t even attend is best friend’s funeral. They are only seen in NY,LA and Cabo. Maybe once in Paris when laying it on thick. They don’t travel, hike, bike, exercise together. No museums, galleries, concerts. Only restaurants and shopping trips. She needs to go away.

  21. Maya says:

    I will never understand people who are complaining about few negative comments written about Jennifer.

    Where were you guys when Angelina was crusified for years on every single news paper, blogs commen sections? Why didn’t you protest then when people especially women called Angelina vile names, wished death & illness and rape on her, racist slurs used against her adopted children and even wished the whole family to die in a plane crash etc?

    Now the tides has changed and Angelina is getting more popular, liked and well respected globally – the comments are finally positive about her.

    The mild negative comments Jennifer gets is nothing compared to what Angelina used to get.

    That is why I have zero respect for Jen hens because they are vile, racist and hypocrites.

    • Mallory says:

      This. Aniston is treated with kid gloves. Its about time she got criticism the same as other celebs. Aniston’s fans are the biggest hypocrites ever. I will never ever ever understand why they expect different standards for her and different standards for everyone else. And yes I have noticed most of Jen fans are racist, vile and bigoted and hateful. Like attracts like I guess.

      • FingerBinger says:

        Jennifer Aniston’s fans are “racist,vile and bigoted and hateful”? Huh?

      • The Original G says:

        “I rolled over and picked up Us Weekly magazine off the floor. The cover had a picture of Angelina, Brad, and their little Eskimo son, Maddox. I saw staring at the photo, wondering why this little boy looks so pissed off in every picture.

        At first I thought he was just pissed about his Mohawk, but then I realized he’s probably furious. Maddox must have thought he hit the jackpot when some A-list celebrity rescued him from third-world Cambodia, only to discover that she was going to shuffle him back and for the to EVERY other third-world country in the universe. He’s probably like, ‘When the fuck are we gonna get to Malibu, bitch?”
        ― Chelsea Handler, Are You There, Vodka? It’s Me, Chelsea
        __________________________________________________
        ….’She’s a homewrecker, she is,’ the 37-year-old said.
        ‘She can rescue as many babies from as many countries as she wants to,’ she said of the actress, who has three adopted children.
        ‘I don’t f***ing believe you. She gives interviews, “I don’t have a lot of female friends.” Because you’re a f***ing c***,’ she continued.
        ‘You’re a f***ing b****!’

        _________________________________________________
        “She seems like a demon,” Handler said of Jolie during a March 5 appearance on Bravo’s Watch What Happens Live. “It has nothing to do with Jennifer. As a woman, I know when you see somebody walking across the room that’s a bad girl. I just don’t like Angelina Jolie

        _________________________________________________
        A lot of people feel that because of her close relationship with Jen that Chelsea has acted as a mouthpiece. Aniston has never distanced herself from these comment and or Chelsea. there’s more if you care to look it up.

      • BoredAndExtremelyDangerous says:

        Hi, The Original G,

        Thanks for your above post ^^^.

        I’m not familiar with this Chelsea Handler person, apart from what I’ve read here. Wow. She sounds positively vile! I’m gobsmacked that a grown woman, afforded such a public profile and platform with the potential to send positive messages to the world, could be such a nasty, bitter and reprehensible human. With devoted **Friends**, no less…

        Wow.

      • maddelina says:

        Why blame Jennifer Aniston for something CH said (which I agree is vile)? Chelsie Handler is friends with many HW celebrities. It’s reaching a bit far to give yourself a reason to hate on JA imo and puts you in the same heap as Handler given some of the comments on here.

      • Sal says:

        FingerBinger, your posts on CDAN are proof enough of what Mallory says, not just that but JJ, FF Aniston fan posters etc. It is a fact that Aniston’s fans are the most vile, racist, disgusting and decrepit sub humans. They are truly repulsive and psychotic.

        maddelina, Aniston walked on stage on cue grinning like a Cheshire cat, twice after Handler introed Aniston by making those comments. Aniston clearly approved of it and actively encouraged it. Handler and Aniston went away on an intimate Thanksgiving vacation just for the 2 of them a couple of years back. On their return, Handler launched into the…MOST….VICIOUS attack on Angelina since. What do you think they were talking about on that boating Thanksgiving vacation, just the 2 of them, maddelina? Certainly not the stock exchange. You have to be desperately reaching to suggest that Aniston has NOTHING to do with Handler’s comments. Come on, we all know Aniston is giving her the ammo. She smirked and grinned while walking onto the stage STRAIGHT AFTER Handler slammed Angelina as a way to intro Aniston. On TWO *SEPARATE* occasions. If you don’t believe Aniston encourages her, you are a damn fool. Or just lying to us. Put it this way: Angelina is introed, on two separate occasions, on a talk show – the host of whom she is close friends with. This host intros her by slamming Aniston and calling Aniston all sorts of names. Angelina walks on stage, grinning like a Cheshire cat. On TWO SEPARATE occasions/interviews. You honestly going to tell us that you and your fellow fans at FF wouldn’t be slamming Angelina for encouraging her host friend? Seriously? We all KNOW Aniston has actively encouraged Handler. Stop trying to excuse Aniston’s actions. Aniston is a vicious conniving manipulator and the mastermind behind Handler’s vicious attacks on Angelina. Face facts.