Elsevier

Burns

Volume 44, Issue 5, August 2018, Pages 1091-1099
Burns

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in severe respiratory failure resulting from burns and smoke inhalation injury

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2018.01.022Get rights and content

Abstract

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is one of the most frequent forms of extracorporeal life support (ECLS) and can be used as rescue therapy in patients with severe respiratory failure resulting from burns and/or smoke inhalation injury. Experience and literature on this treatment option is still very limited, consequently results are varied. We report a retrospective analysis of our experience with veno-venous (VV) ECMO in burn patients. All five patients, three male and two female (age: 28–37 years) had flame type burns and smoke inhalation injury. Their Murray scores ranged between 3.25 and 3.75, and their revised Baux scores between 62 and 102. The mean pre-ECMO conventional ventilation time was 7.4 days (3–13). The mean ECMO duration was 18 days (8–35). Three patients were cannulated with dual lumen, two with separate cannulae. One oxygenator had to be changed due to technical issues and two patients needed two parallel oxygenators. Four patients had renal replacement therapy. All patients needed vasoconstrictor support, antibiotics and packed red blood cells (5–62 units). Three had steroid treatment. All five patients were successfully weaned from ECMO. One patient died later from multi-organ failure in the ICU, the other four patients survived. VV-ECMO is a useful rescue intervention in patients with burns related severe respiratory failure. Patients in our institution benefit from having both burns and ECMO centres with major expertise in the field under one roof. The results from this small cohort are encouraging, although more cases are needed to draw more robust conclusions.

Introduction

Pulmonary injury resulting from burns and/or acute smoke inhalation presents with multifaceted pathophysiology. The profound inflammation of airways with pulmonary shunting as well as augmented micro-vascular pressure gradient often results in hypoxemic respiratory failure [1], [2], [3]. Acute lung injury (ALI) as a result of smoke inhalation contributes significantly to the overall morbidity and mortality of fire victims. Thirty years ago, Shirani et al. [4] described additive effects on mortality in patients with burns and inhalation injury. The authors reported increased mortality of burn patients of approximately 20% with smoke inhalation, up to 40% from pneumonia, and up to 60% if both were present (at the midrange of age and burn size) [4], [5].

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a relatively new technology that emerged about 50 years ago and today is routinely used in specialized centres for neonatal, pediatric, and adult respiratory and cardiac failure [7]. It was used for the first time in a burn patient in 1994 [6]. ECMO can be used in veno-venous configuration (VV-ECMO) to provide adequate extracorporeal gas exchange in isolated refractory respiratory failure of numerous causes, or in veno-arterial configuration (VA-ECMO), when support for cardiac and/or circulatory support is required [8]. The overall goal of ECMO in patients with severe respiratory failure is to achieve adequate gas exchange, and to allow a reduced intensity of mechanical ventilation, thereby decreasing the potentially deleterious effects of ventilator-induced lung injury prior to recovery. Consequently, ECMO may be considered the definitive rescue therapy for refractory life-threatening hypoxemia, since pulmonary gas exchange is not required [5], [9].

The use of ECMO in neonatal respiratory failure has been established for decades and is supported by randomized trials [10]. Use in adult respiratory failure is more controversial given poor outcomes in early randomized trials [11], [12]. The CESAR trial from 2009 [13] and various case series have shown improved outcomes with survival rates between 75% and 85% in patients with refractory respiratory failure who were referred to an ECMO centre [14], [15]. To date, only a few studies assessing ECMO in the field of burn and/or acute smoke inhalation injury have been published. This retrospective study reports our experience with five patients requiring ECMO for severe hypoxemic respiratory failure post-burn and smoke inhalation injury.

Section snippets

Material and methods

The respiratory ECMO service at Wythenshawe Hospital was founded on December 1st, 2011. All patients with burn and/or smoke inhalation injury who were ever treated on ECMO were retrospectively reviewed up to June 30th, 2017. Where appropriate, telephone enquiries were carried out about the post-intensive care course. Data was safely stored in the hospital’s ECMO database. This was an internal audit and service review that did not require ethical approval, as determined by the National Health

Results

Since the respiratory ECMO service was started, six patients have been referred for VV-ECMO with burns and burn related inhalational injury causing severe respiratory failure. Five patients were suitable for VV-ECMO and received the intervention. Over this time period, 1436 burn patients were treated at the burn centre, of which 101 required intubation and mechanical ventilation. The ECMO Service treated 163 patients on ECMO during that time. Patients 1, 4, and 5 were transferred to our

Discussion

We report a retrospective study, which at present show the best reported outcomes when compared to all previous reports. The patients were young (28–37 years) with BMIs in the normal range (21–28). They all had some degree of inhalation injury confirmed by bronchoscopy. Their revised Baux score ranging between 62 and 102. In all cases, ARDS was severe according to the Berlin Definition [18]. The cardiovascular status of all patients required vasoconstrictor support and particularly patient 5

Conclusion

At the present time the acceptance of ECMO as a useful intervention for patients with burns related severe respiratory failure remains equivocal. Lung protective ventilator rest settings while on ECMO prevent secondary lung injury. Burn patients receive large amounts of initial fluid resuscitation and are at high risk for pulmonary oedema as well as pneumonitis and/or pneumonia from inhalation injury. Therefore, ECMO can be a life-saving bridge to recovery. In our experience VV-ECMO is a very

Conflicts of interest

The authors report to have no conflict of interest in regards to this study.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the staff of the Cardio-Thoracic Critical Care Unit and the Burn Intensive Care Centre at Wythenshawe Hospital and everybody involved in the care of these patients. Part of this study was presented as abstract and poster at EuroELSO and APELSO 2017.

References (29)

  • D.M. Maybauer et al.

    Treatment strategies for acute smoke inhalation injury

    Anaesthesist

    (2006)
  • K.Z. Shirani et al.

    The influence of inhalation injury and pneumonia on burn mortality

    Ann Surg

    (1987)
  • M. Ombrellaro et al.

    Extracorporeal life support for the treatment of adult respiratory distress syndrome after burn injury

    Surgery

    (1994)
  • A. Combes et al.

    Position paper for the organization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation programs for acute respiratory failure in adult patients

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2014)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Extracorporeal Life Support for Severely Burned Patients with Concurrent Inhalation Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Experience from a Military Medical Burn Center

      2023, Injury
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although Liffner et al. reported that inhalation injury, as assessed by an inhalation lung injury score, did not contribute to the development of ARDS [16], we believe that inhalation injury is also a contributing factor for ARDS, which together exacerbated respiratory dysfunction. Table 5 [10,17-26] shows literature reviews from 1998 to the present. There were 11 cohorts that supported the application of ECLS in burn patients with respiratory failure, which was mainly caused by ARDS, with a PaO2/FiO2 below 100.

    • ECMO Assistance during Mechanical Ventilation: Effects Induced on Energetic and Haemodynamic Variables

      2021, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Veno-Arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is considered in the context of cardiac failure [4]. Veno-Venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is indicated in the context of acute respiratory distress syndrome [5]. More recently, ECMO has been considered in the setting of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR).

    • Effectiveness of ECMO for burn-related acute respiratory distress syndrome

      2019, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      The effectiveness of ECMO has improved since its introduction [6]; however, little has been reported on its effectiveness in the setting of severe ARDS associated with burn injuries. Furthermore, the literature that exists consists primarily of small retrospective case studies, case reports, and case-control studies [7–15]. These studies report a wide range of mortality rates.

    • Early resuscitation and management of severe pediatric burns

      2019, Seminars in Pediatric Surgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      The need for mechanical ventilation and severe inhalation injury noted on bronchoscopy were both found to be independent predictors of mortality.40 Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using venovenous support has been shown to be safe in burn patients who fail maximal respiratory support.33 All patients with inhalational injury require special consideration for carbon monoxide (CO) and cyanide toxicity.

    • Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult Burn Care: A Systematic Review

      2023, International Journal of Artificial Organs
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text