Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Hematology

The case against rituximab maintenance

A Correction to this article was published on 01 December 2009

The monoclonal antibody, rituximab, is used to treat lymphomas. This article discusses the results of randomized trials that suggest patients with follicular lymphoma should not receive rituximab maintenance therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Hainsworth, J. D. et al. Single-agent rituximab as first-line and maintenance treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma: a phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 1746–1751 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghielmini, M. et al. Prolonged treatment with rituximab in patients with follicular lymphoma significantly increases event-free survival and response duration compared with weekly ×4 schedule. Blood 103, 4416–4423 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hochster, H. et al. Maintenance rituximab after cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone prolongs progession-free survival in advanced indolent lymphoma: results of the randomized phase III ECOG1496 study. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 1607–1614 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Forstpointner, R. et al. Maintenance therapy with rituximab leads to a significant prolongation of response duration after salvage therapy with a combination of rituximab, fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and mitoxantrone (R-FCM) in patients with recurring and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG). Blood 108, 4003–4008 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Oers, M. H. et al. Rituximab maintenance improves clinical outcome of relapsed/refractory follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in patients both with and without rituximab during induction: results of a prospective randomized phase III intergroup trial. Blood 108, 3295–3301 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Van Oers, M. H. J. et al. Rituximab maintenance treatment of relapsed/resistant follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: long-term outcome of the EORTC 20981 phase III randomized intergroup study [abstract 836]. Blood 112, 309–310 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vidal, L. et al. Rituximab maintenance for the treatment of patients with follicular lymphma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 101, 248–255 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hainsworth, J. D. et al. Maximizing therapeutic benefit of rituximab: maintenance therapy versus retreatment at progression in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a randomized phase II trial of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 1088–1095 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Habermann, T. M. et al. Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 24, 3121–3127 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Morschhauser, F. et al. Phase III trial of consolidation therapy with 90Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan compared with no additional therapy after first remission in advanced follicular lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 26, 5156–5164 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce D. Cheson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

B. Cheson is a Consultant for Celgene, Roche and Genetech and is on the Speakers' Bureau for Celgene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheson, B. The case against rituximab maintenance. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 6, 622–624 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.161

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.161

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing