Possible southern reef closure

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Dave Dillehay and Memo Mendoza, l would like to hear your plans for adjusting to the restrictions as they develop. I will be down in March, and maybe things will have changed by then. I won’t miss the Palancar sites that much, except that Bricks was always a good place to finish a dive at Columbia Deep. I would miss the Columbia sites, Punta Sur, Maracaibo and Los Islotes. Possible east side dives further north could be interesting. Personally, I am really happy with Delilah and La Francesca any time. You can always start on the wall and come in shallow. I haven’t seen that much of Santa Rosa or San Francisco lately, but those are good options. I personally think Yucab, Tormentos, and Punta Tunich are under-appreciated. I like the northern sites, and Steve Hazard, Tracey Winholt, and I dove one that was pretty shallow and benign a couple of years ago. I thought Steve had a name for it, but I’m not sure it’s really a recognized site. Did not have the dramatic coral of the south, but lots of critters and we found a huge field of sea grass with clouds of razorfish, algae crabs, and other interesting stuff. You had to go slow and focus, but it was magical. Of course, Barracuda and the “adventure” dives will still have to be restricted to properly qualified divers, but you might want to expand availability of these dives. I know you haven’t had time to develop alternative plans yet, but please keep us posted. Oh, and please, the C-53 is not a good option. Been there, done that, not worth the time or gas. There’s plenty to keep me coming back and I have no plans to change my March plans.
 
Not really accurate.

Some ops (ie: Aldora) have several boats without marine park permits, so this is a smart way to put them to use legally by finding sites outside of the park. But to
Answer @ReefHound if these sites were so desirable, other ops would have also been going there all this time. Aldora’s use of boats that can’t legally go into the MP for this use is a smart marketing plan to offer something others don't and it is a smart way to maximize revenue. I don't blame them for that at all. I would do the same.

I will add that these sites do have some allure simply because everyone doesn't visit them, but due to their location they involve more risk and require advanced divers so not suitable for everyone.
Dear Christi , with all respect, I don’t normally participate here but I will like to clarify something.

I bought the Aldora VI in 2015 specially to navigate and dive to the northern sites I explored IT WAS BOUGHT WITH THAT IDEA IN MIND , really proud of it.

same as we did back in 2006 in the east side with Gaviota that now we use as a chase boat, we dive the east side with our regular boats with permits in the present time.

So out of our 7 boats only One is with no permit.

We love to explore and innovate and find new reefs for everyone and for us, it was and is that
Passion that drives us not the necessity of use of boats with no marine park permits.

why others don’t do the same I don’t know?

But we live on an island surrounded by water I guess there is people that are more curious than others.


I’m sorry but you are wrong.

Memo Mendoza
Aldora Divers Explorer
 
Hello,
My wife and I have a trip scheduled for mid Oct - through Nov. at Iberostar. We have been to Coz. 5 times and have
dove all over the world . We picked Iberostar due to its location to the Palancar system , it is so beautiful...
If the authorities had planed this better, in advance, then we could have opted for a more central or north location as in the past.
Sorry for the dive opts having to deal with this decision but it is what it is .
I cant control what the authorities do but I can control what I do, we will go on this trip and enjoy what is available but since the authorities show no respect for my time and money It will be our last to coz. We debated on going to Bonaire or the Caymans but opted for Cozumel. Heinsite is so valuable !
I hope the dive opts will share the statements made by their customers or should I say past customers !
In my line of work, PISS POOR PLANNING CAUSES PISS POOR PERFORMANCE, MAYBE THESE WORDS ARE WORTH SHARING WITH THE AUTHORITIES !!!
Would someone share what dive op would pic up at Iberostar to do Northern sites..... Trying to make the best of a very disappointing situation....
Thank you for reading.
 
This is why I don't buy lottery tickets. We are arriving on the 5th and are planning our first boat dive on the 7th.

This is going to be awfully strange to the fishes who are used to seeing many divers every day and then, suddenly, nothing.


I guess I should by lottery tickets, I was just about to book my flights on Sunday night and I saw this thread.
Back in 2005 I was at a travel agent and was about to book an all-inclusive package to Cozumel, said I would think about it and come back the next day and then they announced a hurricane heading towards the Yucatan.

I hope the people of Cozumel get some good luck thrown their way and this turns around.
 
Scubajeg, Iberostar should have a resident dive op. How dive ops adjust to this change will become apparent soon. Don't expect a dive op to motor down to Iberostar from town to dive Barracuda north of town.

There should be several dive sites close to your hotel.

Not being able to dive Palancar and south is not good but you should still have plenty of good diving ahead of you.
 
from todays news: Best article so far.

Protective measures are necessary
September 24, 2019

In Cozumel

0
COARG1-1.jpg




By Gabriel Aguilar



COZUMEL, September 23.- The most important reefs of Cozumel will be closed to all aquatic activities, as well as the emblematic “El Cielo” beach, as a precautionary measure of preservation, combined with being able to analyze water quality and coral reactions to the stress reduction If not closed, one could lose 1.5 billion pesos, with social, tourist, and economic impact on the destination.

On Monday, the National Commission of Natural Protected Areas (Conanp) held a press conference headed by its local manager, Brenda Hernández Hernández, to inform citizens of the temporary closure of the “Palancar”, “Colombia” reefs, the beach (not reef) "El Cielo", until "Bosh" beach on the east coast, for a period of three months, beginning on October 7.

For the month of November, a reevaluation monitoring will be carried out in order to deliver scientific data to the Marine Park Advisory Council and based on this, determine the opening or other type of strategies such as a “today does not circulate” to vessels with permission, or give way to other strategies.

The reason for the closure is the white syndrome, a pathogen that kills corals, especially those known as “brain,” due to multifactorial causes, among these, they consider environmental stress at any time of the year, with damage to the reefs being detected. of Cozumel just in October 2018.

It was emphasized that water quality is a factor by which the presence of white syndrome could occur, and that water deterioration is caused by polluting factors, various chemical substances from different sources of origin.

From the presence of detergents in the water, Conanp, points out that all reefs exceed the limit, and have found five species of macroalgae, bioindicators of contamination due to nutrient increase.

This water condition, generates the appearance of marine organisms, considered as direct "competitors" of corals and end up killing them too.

From the impact of the white syndrome, he informed that in July 2018, there was already a presence throughout the Marine Park, affecting 27 species considered as important for the natural construction of the reef and that currently there is an impact of 50 percent of corals .

The intention is to reduce the stress load in these better preserved areas, because the amount of income to the entire reserve has been increasing.

It was evidenced that in 2017 the total number of 329 vehicles with 2 620 620 passengers entered the entire Marine Park. Only in 2018, the load rose to 547 vehicles with 3 thousand 44 people, meaning an increase of 40 percent in vehicles and 14 percent extra in visitors.

Of the “Palancar” reef, he explained that there were 78 boats in 2017, against 115 of the following year reflecting a 32 percent increase.

In the line of tourists there were 741 tourists in 2017 against 950 in 2018, that was a 25 percent variation upwards.

To all this it was exposed that the real load capacity established in 2017 for “Palancar” and “Colombia”, was 29 and 33 vehicles respectively, only that the following year increased to 42 in both reefs, causing “Palancar” to increase in it loads 144 percent, while in "Colombia" 127 percent.

Regarding the beach "El Cielo", in 2015 there were 9 boats, for 2018 there were 30 registered, representing 333 percent of extra cargo.

Regarding the impacts or direct contacts to the reef produced by incoming divers, Conanp deduced that 24 impacts are generated by four divers in 30 minutes, stating that the “Colombia” reef is exposed to 29 thousand 258 impacts in four hours, while In “Palancar”, 12,234 impacts are generated at the same time.

Brenda Hernández Hernández pointed out that the healthy reef generates an income of 5,493 million pesos annually, but if the necessary measures are not taken, the reef system is put at risk and there would be a reduction of 12 percent of tourists, whose absence would be equivalent to an economic loss of 1,500 million pesos a year.

He said that water quality sampling has been done, visit hotels near the Marine Park to learn about its sanitary discharge infrastructure.

He spoke of seeking rest in the best preserved areas of the cozumeleño reef, to ensure compliance with the conservation objectives and that the restricted areas will have supervision and surveillance actions, in addition to scientific monitoring.

They will have the support of the Secretariat of Martina and the Port Captaincy, to withdraw vessels that intend to enter the area and if they relapse they will be sanctioned.

The terrestrial surveillance routes to verify that no one is sneaking in will also be carried out with the Secretary of the Navy and / or National Guard.

From the entry of foreign vessels from Playa del Carmen and / or Cancun to these points, especially to “El Cielo” beach, he accepted that they are supposedly “due to ignorance”.

Only local tourism service providers claim that foreigners enter daily without fear of being sanctioned, ignoring the cause.

Hernández Hernández, acknowledged that Conanp does not carry out fixed surveillance to detect outsiders, but "the operations are now, and we are going."

He said that from January to date "they are going as six, seven, eight, (boats) sanctioned by the Captaincy of Port, and every time we leave we return about 20 to 30 boats."

COARG2-2-300x198.jpg
COARG3-1-300x169.jpg


Tags: CozumelQuintana Roo
 
Temporary agreement to save corals
September 24, 2019

In Cozumel

0
COMAK2-9.jpg




By Karina Carrión



COZUMEL, September 23.- Opinions found was what was derived from the informative meeting held by Conanp personnel with providers of nautical and aquatic services of Cozumel, after these were notified of the partial closure of the marine park. Owners of independent, annoying companies said they cooperate in the care of the reefs affected by bleaching, while demanding the opening date of the areas that will be shielded.

With the encouragement found, an informational meeting was held for tourism service providers conducted by Brenda Hernández Hernández, director of the National Commission of Protected Natural Areas (Conanp) in Cozumel, which made a presentation of the current conditions in which is the marine park and the 13 reef points of it, announcing that from next October 7 a part of the southern zone will be closed as detailed in another note of this same newspaper.

This situation was not to the liking of the more than one hundred attendees dedicated to the nautical and aquatic sector where they were present from environmentalists, business owners, sailors, captains to independent divers, some of them agree that closure is not the solution to the problem of reef whitening, while on the other hand another group of affected people let them know that they agreed to join the partial closure.

During the interventions in which more than anything the attendees gave their points of view and others narrated their experience at sea or their rejection at the close, Guadalupe Martín, representative of the CIMAC environmental group, let them know that unlike everyone present at the enclosure that receives income from their work at sea, she as the volunteers of the group she represents, have been working on cleaning the sea floor, revealing data that led to the total silence of the auditorium by mentioning that in addition, the objects that have most detected have been wastes emitted from the boats. She called the attendees by saying: “The sea has given us money. Better life. He gives us income, but what do we do for him? You don't even want to let it rest for a few months, ” words applauded and that made those present reasoned, who accepted the closure of the area, as long as it is guaranteed that in November they would announce the result of the first monitoring so that a new “no circulation today” program can be implemented. Thus avoiding the agonizing affectation to this sector, who asked for more information in detail, so they would be visiting the director of Conanp to jointly find mechanisms that allow the same purpose, to protect Cozumel corals.



COMAK4-2-300x225.jpg
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/peregrine/

Back
Top Bottom