Skip to main contentSkip to navigationSkip to navigation
Philip Hammond
THe IPPR accused Philip Hammond of ‘abandoning crucial budget protections on the sly’. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA
THe IPPR accused Philip Hammond of ‘abandoning crucial budget protections on the sly’. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA

Tory spending pledges on police, education and childcare 'at risk'

This article is more than 7 years old

IPPR believes Philip Hammond’s call for £3.5bn of cuts cannot be met if previous spending pledges are maintained

Conservative promises to protect spending on police, sixth form education and childcare are at risk as Philip Hammond demands £3.5bn in new cuts from his cabinet colleagues, according to an analysis by the IPPR thinktank.

The IPPR believes the government will not be able to hit its savings target, even allowing for proposed budget cuts, at the same time as meeting spending promises made by George Osborne when he was chancellor.

Alfie Stirling, the IPPR’s senior economist, said, “The chancellor is abandoning crucial budget protections on the sly. Whitehall has announced that departments are being told to model cuts of between 3% and 6%, in order to save £3.5bn. But IPPR modelling has shown that this is unlikely to be achieved without raiding budgets that are currently protected.”

When he launched the spending review in 2015, Osborne made a series of other spending promises, including protecting the police budget in real terms; ring-fencing funding for 16-19 education; protecting adult skills and delivering 30 hours a week free childcare for all three- and four-year-olds.

However, when the Treasury announced a new new drive for “efficiency savings” earlier this week, the only spending commitments that were reaffirmed were Conservative manifesto pledges to protect the core schools budgets and the NHS; and a subsequent promise to meet the Nato target of spending 2% of GDP on defence.

“In order for the chancellor to meet his own target, he must now look to cut money that his predecessor had previously promised to protect only 15 months ago,” Stirling said. He added that “the police budget could now face a further £250 to £500m in cuts that the public were not aware of”.

Whitehall departments were instructed to draw up proposals to trim their budgets by 3% to 6% in 2019-20, the final year of the current spending review period. Sources at several Whitehall departments suggested nothing was off limits in the search for cuts, which the Treasury’s statement said would, “take a strategic look at how government delivers services across the whole public sector”.

Asked about whether all the spending promises made in 2015 would be honoured, a Treasury spokesman said: “This is only the first stage, and we will provide an update in the autumn.”

On whether Theresa May’s old department of the Home Office would still be able to protect the policing budget in real terms, the Treasury spokesman added: “Her Majesty’s Inspector of Constabulary has set out that there is room for improvements in police efficiency.”

A Home Office source said Amber Rudd’s department did not expect to be one of those hit hardest by the cuts. Osborne told MPs in November 2015: “Now is not the time for further police cuts. Now is the time to back our police and give them the tools do the job. I am today announcing there will be no cuts in the police budget at all. There will be real-terms protection for police funding. The police protect us, and we’re going to protect the police.”

The plan to come up with an extra £3.5bn in efficiency savings by the end of the parliament was announced at last year’s budget, as the government geared up for the EU referendum; but at the time Osborne never specified where the savings would come from.

Julian McCrae, director of thinktank the Institute for Government, said there were some areas of public spending where the government might be able to maintain services and cut back costs but, “there’s quite a few services where if they want more efficiencies, they have to do something quite different and transformative”.

He added that after several rounds of efficiency savings, and more than six years into the Conservatives’ austerity programme, the government would have to watch for warning signals that it is cutting too drastically in some areas. He pointed to the example of prisons, where Liz Truss recently had to announce that new staff would be hired, amid rising violence and unrest.

Hammond will deliver his first budget next week. He is expected to find more money to tackle the short-term crisis in social care – and promise to draw up proposals by the autumn, for putting the creaking system on a sustainable footing.

This will be the last spring budget, after Hammond announced last year that he would move the main fiscal event of the year to the autumn. He will deliver two budgets in 2017 – before moving to just one a year from next year.

With the economic outlook heavily dependent on how the article 50 negotiations on leaving the European progress, and how financial markets, consumers and businesses respond, Hammond hopes to present a steady-as-she-goes statement.

He loosened tax and spending rules in the autumn statement last year, allowing himself more room for manoeuvre to take emergency measures if the economy turns down.

More on this story

More on this story

  • Tories condemn May over chancellor's national insurance humiliation

  • Theresa May declares 'absolute faith' in Hammond after U-turn

  • Hammond's NICs U-turn is a political disaster for the government

  • OmNICshambles: how it all went wrong for 'spreadsheet Phil' Hammond

  • 'Rookie error': former chancellor criticises Hammond's NICs plan

  • Families could lose up to 16% of income after NIC and benefit changes

  • Tax will torment the Conservatives long after the Brexit rage fades

  • Davis: MPs must choose between May's deal and crashing out of EU

  • MPs not appeased by May's decision to review self-employed tax hike

Most viewed

Most viewed