Abstract
Current cognitive multimedia design theories provide several guidelines on how to integrate verbal and pictorial information. However, the recommendations for the design of auditory texts (narrations) are still fragmentary, especially with regard to the characteristics of the voices used. In the current paper, a fundamental question is addressed, namely, whether to use a male or a female speaker. In two experiments, learners studied dynamic visualizations on probability theory that were accompanied by narrations. The learner’s gender and the speaker’s gender served as between-subjects variables. In the first study, learners were randomly assigned to speakers of different gender. In the second study, learners could choose among different speakers. The results show that learners achieved better learning outcomes when the narration was presented by a female speaker rather than a male speaker irrespective of the learner’s gender (speaker/gender effect). Being given the choice, learners preferred female speakers, but this individual preference had no impact on learning outcomes. The results suggest augmenting purely cognitive approaches to multimedia design by social-motivational assumptions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkinson, R. K., Mayer, R. E., & Merrill, M. M. (2004). Fostering social agency in multimedia learning: Examining the impact of an animated agent’s voice. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 117–139.
Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364.
Crane, M., & Markus, H. (1982). Gender identity: The benefits of a self-schema approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1195–1197.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004a). Intrinsic motivation inventory. Retrieved May 17, 2004, from www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/intrins_scl.html.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004b). Subject impression questionnaire. Retrieved May 17, 2004, from www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/intrins_scl.html.
Forgasz, G. B., Leder, L. E., & Klosterman, P. (2004). New perspectives on the gender stereotyping of mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6, 389–420.
Franzoi, S. L. (1996). Social psychology. Dubuque, IA: Brown & Benchmark.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of experimental and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Hoffmann, R. M., & Borders, L. D. (2001). Twenty-five years after the Bem sex-role inventory: A reassessment and new issues regarding classification variability. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34, 39–55.
Isbister, K., & Nass, C. (2000). Consistency of personality in interactive characters: Verbal cues, non-verbal cues and user characteristics. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 53, 251–267.
Lee, E.-J. (2008). Gender stereotyping of computers: Resource depletion or reduced attention? Journal of Communication, 58, 301–320.
Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38–50.
Markus, H., Smith, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.
Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker’s voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 419–425.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 358–368.
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 724–733.
Nass, C., & Lee, K. M. (2001). Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7, 171–181.
Nass, C., Moon, Y., & Green, N. (1997). Are machines gender-neutral? Gender stereotypic responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 864–876.
Payne, T. J., Connor, J. M., & Colletti, G. (1987). Gender-based schematic processing: An empirical investigation and reevaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 937–945.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications.
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461.
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Making the abstract concrete: Visualizing mathematical solution procedures. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 9–25.
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., Vollmann, B. & Catrambone, R. (2009). The impact of learner characteristics on information utilization strategies, cognitive load experienced, and performance in hypermedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 19, 387–401.
Schneider-Düker, M., & Kohler, A. (1988). Die Erfassung von Geschlechtsrollen—Ergebnisse zur deutschen Neukonstruktion des Bem Sex-Role-Inventory. Diagnostica, 34, 256–270. (The measurement of sex-roles—Results on the development of a German version of the Bem Sex-Role-Inventory).
Spence, J. T. (1993). Gender-related traits and gender ideology: Evidence for a multifactorial theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 624–635.
Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychological Review, 10, 251–296.
Vollmeyer, R., Rollett, W., Rheinberg, F. (1997). How motivation affects learning. In M. G. Shafto, & P. Langley (Eds.), Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 796–801). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zahn, C. J., & Hopper, R. (1985). Measuring language attitudes: The speech evaluation instrument (SEI). Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 4, 113–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Linek, S.B., Gerjets, P. & Scheiter, K. The speaker/gender effect: does the speaker’s gender matter when presenting auditory text in multimedia messages?. Instr Sci 38, 503–521 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9115-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9115-8