Today, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rep. Gosar (R-AZ) joined a letter with twelve Senate and six House colleagues in asking Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson to rescind the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule in an effort to empower local communities to tackle their own unique zoning challenges.
Original Title
Sen. Lee, Rep. Gosar and Colleagues Send Letter Asking Sec. Carson to Rescind Zoning Rule
Today, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rep. Gosar (R-AZ) joined a letter with twelve Senate and six House colleagues in asking Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson to rescind the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule in an effort to empower local communities to tackle their own unique zoning challenges.
Today, Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and Rep. Gosar (R-AZ) joined a letter with twelve Senate and six House colleagues in asking Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson to rescind the Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule in an effort to empower local communities to tackle their own unique zoning challenges.
Congress of the Gnited States
‘Washington, BE 20510
July 14, 2017
‘The Honorable Benjamin Carson Sr.
Secretary
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
4517" Street SW
Washington, D.C., 20410
Dear Secretary Carson,
Congratulations on your confirmation as Secretary of Housing and Urban Development. We look
forward to working with you to develop new solutions to the many challenges facing our
country’s housing sector.
As you know, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) issued compliance
guidance in July 2015 on the Fair Housing Act (Title XIII of the 1968 Civil Rights Act). This
“Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) Final Rule,” requires HUD grant recipients to
examine their planning practices in an effort to curtail discrimination, and sets up @ new database
within HUD to collect regional and local demographic data on race, class, and English language
proficiency, among other measures.
Under the AFFH rule, state and local governments may not receive federal grant money,
including Community Development Block Grants (CDBGs), unless they voluntarily change their
zoning laws to “affirmatively further fair housing,” HUD will make discretionary judgments
about whether jurisdictions have achieved this objective using data collected through a new
mapping tool.
The rule would give jurisdictions roughly five years to remedy these so-called imbalances
discovered by HUD. However, not all proposals will be approved to receive funding, The
department may withhold federal funding from jurisdictions whose housing plans do not
conform to “disparate impact theory.” Under this theory, communities could be sued for illegal
discrimination, with racial disparity statistics admissible as evidence.
We stand with you in opposing any and all instances of discrimination, but this rule does not.
actually help in that effort. Instead, it would extend reach of the federal government beyond its
authority and could take away state and local governments’ ability to make local zoning
decisions.
Rather than undermining the autonomy of local housing authorities, we believe the federal
government must empower local communities to tackle their own unique challenges, in
compliance with the Fair Housing Act, without the threat of a new arbitrary federal mandate,As we have already witnessed, this rule disproportionally places a heavier burden on smaller
communities who could be denied funds unless they make radical, sweeping changes to their
well-established zoning laws that are compliant with the Fair Housing Act. This rule simply
represents a continuation of the previous administration’s radical pursuit of using disparate
impact theory to punish communities that are not as demographically diverse as they would have
wished.
Ina July 2015 Washington Times article, you rightfully stated that HUD was attempting to
“legislate racial equality create consequences that often make matters worse,” We share your
perspective, Although the Supreme Court narrowly upheld disparate impact theory in Texas
Department of Housing and Community Affairs v, Inclusive Communities Project, et al. (2015),
‘we agree with you that “as with other mandated social-engineering schemes, the sort of
unintended consequences Justice Samuel Alito alluded to in his dissent lurk in the shadows.”
Moving forward, we respectfully ask that you use your authority to rescind the AFFH rule in its
entirety. Itis critical that we pursue real, sensible reforms to reduce poverty and improve the
opportunities available to lower-income citizens at the local level.
We look forward to partnering with you to ensure justice and opportunity are preserved in every
neighborhood across our great land.
Sincerely,
a a0 Pa ®
MichatiSs. Lee Paul A. Gosar, DDS.
United States Senate
Richard Shelby €
United States Senate
Tom (Mes
Tom Cotton
ae States Senate
M. Michael Rounds
United States Senate USS. House of RepresentativesUnited States Senate
=x Daines ( 4
United States Senate
Michael B. Enzi--—~
oe States Senate >
- 2D
fe
James Carkford” c
/5 d sa e0
Rand Paul, M.D.
United States Senate
Fi,
Risch’
United States Senate
wreo Rubio
United States Senate
7 Se
Ken Buck
ae of Representatives
Glenn Grothman
U.S. House of Representatives
owt? Meats
‘Thomas Massie
U.S. House of Representatives