Macmillan Consortium Vote

	A	B	C	D	E
1	Marmot Member Library	Vote	Comments	Director Approved
2	Adams State	Yes		Approved by Jeff Bullington
3	Basalt	yes		Approved by Berenice Forrest
4	Bemis	Yes		Approved by Nancy Trimm
5	Bud Werner	Yes	I hate that we have to even consider this, but at a minimum we need some sort of fund in place for collective buying even if we choose to buy less or only portions of the list. I'm open to collection devel. options - but we need money first.	Approved by Chris Painter
6	Buena Vista	Yes	Can we review this in a year?	Approved by Cecilia LaFrance
7	Colorado Christian University	no		Approved by Gayle Gunderson
8	Colorado Mesa University	yes	Happy to contribute to the collective	Approved by Sylvia Rael
9	Colorado Mountain College	no	Of course will contribute if outvoted	Approved by Yuliya Lef
10	Eagle Valley	yes	Love the new approach of request based purchasing	Approved by Diane Levin
11	Englewood	no	Like many comments here, this is not the path we would go, but will be a good voting member of the consortium and contribute
12	Garfield County	Yes		Approved by Brett Lear
13	Grand County	yes	Similar comment to Pitkin and Lake; however, it is part of being a good member of the consortium. We'd like to review our usership at the year mark to determine if accurate path.	Approved by Polly Gallagher	I think reviewing at the one year mark is a very good idea. EVT
14	Gunnison
15	Lake County	No	I feel the same way was Pitkin - I feel like we're kind of being cornered into purchasing titles we never would have bought in the first place. There are very few titles on that list that excite me. But of course Lake will contribute because we are being out voted.	Approved by Brena Smith
16	Mesa County Valley Schools SD51	Yes	We can support the shared collection at $250.00 per year.	Approved by Shelly Fratzke	Thank you, Shelly! I'm sorry you were left off the list! -EVT
17	Mesa County	Yes		Approved by Shana Wade
18	Pine River	Yes	I don't want to reward Macmillan but I don't want to punish our patrons, either. I think it's important to capitalize on the one inexpensive, sharable copy they let us buy. I'm also okay with Alysa purchasing fewer titles than 250 over 12 months, as long as we capture those our patrons want most. EVT	Approved by Shelley Walchak.
19	Pitkin County	No	My vote is no, but we will happily contribute if we are outvoted, which it looks like we are. I feel like we are buying titles we never would have bought, and we are supporting them more than before. This is really getting to me.	Approved by Susan Keenan
20	Rampart	Yes		Approved by Michelle Dukette
21	Salida	Yes		Approved by Susan Matthews
22	Summit County	Yes		Approved by Stephanie Ralph
23	Vail	yes	VPL is totally reluctant about this, but it does provide a shared copy. VPL seconds the voices that do not want to purchase all Macmillan titles, but we agree that we don't want to punish patrons with a complete boycott	Approved by Lori Barnes
24	Western Colorado University	No	We only purchase a few OverDrive titles per year (if that) and are not a heavy e-book/e-audiobook using institition but will support our brethern.	Approved by Dustin Fife; requests be sent to the Board for review
25	Wilkinson Public	yes	Let's try to buy as few Macmillan titles as possible (only really popular titles) so we aren't supporting Macmillan, please!	Approved by library director, Sarah.
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100