Slick Multicamera Video on the Cheap

concertDavid Pogue

Last week, my son’s middle-school jazz band performed at the conference of the Connecticut Music Educators’ Association in Hartford, Conn. It was a big thrill for our 11-year-old piano player; only one jazz band, one chorus and one orchestra had been invited to play.

The jazz band’s director, who knows of my background, asked if I’d be willing to videotape the performance. Willing!? You kidding? I live for this stuff!

In fact, I hatched a spectacular scheme: I’d do a multicamera shoot. I’d take two Flip Mino HD camcorders — little tiny plastic boxes, smaller than an iPod — and tape them up onto mike stands or flagpoles to get interesting full-band angles. Then I’d sit in the audience with my Canon HV30 hi-def tape camcorder for the detail work: closeups of soloists, pans across the faces, gradual pullout zooms and so on.

And then I’d edit it all together in Final Cut, which has a multiple-camera feature. Supposedly, once you’ve dumped all your footage onto the Mac, you can watch the multiple camera feeds play back together in a window. You can record your cutting between camera angles using keyboard keystrokes, as though you’re a director in a control room.

The show was fantastic — these kids are really, really good — and the Flips performed flawlessly, recording the entire 45-minute show in a single take.

Once in Final Cut, however, I discovered a few problems. First, the Flips’ audio and video drifts out of sync if a single shot goes on too long. (I’m guessing that not many people routinely use the Flip camcorder for such long takes, which is why I hadn’t heard of this glitch.) That pretty much ruled out my using the multiclip editing feature, which requires perfect sync between the audio and video of your multiple angles. (I wound up cutting between video tracks manually, which wasn’t as quick but worked fine.)

Second, the Flip footage didn’t match the color of the Canon’s footage. The Flips remembered the room lighting being slightly yellower than the Canon did — enough to notice every time I switched cameras. I bumbled around in Final Cut until I found the Color Correction filter, which made it simple to remove the yellow cast to match the Canon’s tint. Final Cut had to “re-render” all of that Flip video after that, which took an hour, but the result was magnificent.

I’ll try to get permission to post the final product online so you can see it (which can be tricky when kids are involved).

But here’s the bottom line: I wound up creating what looks like one of those PBS Carnegie Hall specials. Sure, two of my three cameras were unmanned, cheap plastic boxes, held in place with duct tape. But they let me keep interest alive by cutting back and forth, interspersing closeups of young players concentrating, soloists’ fingers riffing, audience reaction shots and so on — on the cheap. On the very, very cheap.

Let the grass-roots video revolution continue!

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Sounds pretty slick. Hope you can post it.

“— on the cheap. On the very, very cheap.”

You had me going, you really did. So I went to Apple.com to check out this “Final Cut”. (I don’t own a mac, yet) Yikes! It’s $1300! That’s very very cheap???

No thanks.

ho hum…with news like this no wonder the papers are going by the way of the dodo. videographers have been taping music on the cheap for quite some time now….its called “taping”…thanks Pogue – for illuminating yet another way you’re about 8 years behind the curve. sounds about right for your audience.

How did you record the audio?

How did you handle sound?

that’s pretty cool. (playing in hartford, and the video). I’ve been trying to buy a flip mino because i do so many things with my school that it would be great to record it all. a few weeks ago, i got to play violin Avery Fisher Hall with the Western Connecticut Youth Orchestra. This is pretty exciting for a 7th grader, but all i have is some grainy footage from my family’s old camera.

That would be neat if you could post it. It usually is tricky, but it would be neat to see how it worked. Don’t post all 45 minutes, though, just a couple is good for me.

“continue” being a key word … :)

Could you have used an audio dat recorder (I’m old) or one of the digital audio recorders, and sync that with your video?

Awesome! I am so glad to hear about your setup! Wonder if you used the Macbook Air for FinalCut or a mac desktop?

Congratulations on your efforts, David! It sounded complicated at first, but, between your explanation and the technology, it sounds like something even a mere mortal could do!

Sweet ! I might use your idea someday … I have a 7-year-old who just started piano lessons. Lets hope that by the time I have to shoot his middle school stuff, the setup would include at least one holographic camera :-)

I figure if you really wanted to you could have set up separate audio tracks too, or just used the one on the Cannon. Seems like that would give you the most consistent sound.

Phew! I’m glad this was about the flip. I just ordered one today and when I saw ‘video’ in the headline in Reader I thought maybe I’d missed a hot new product by a couple hours.

In case you do it again … couldn’t you have extracted the audio from all 3 tracks and used only the audio from the Canon? You could then flip between video as much as you liked as none of the video contains any actual sound?

(I don’t know anything about Final Cut, just messed around alot getting a wedding video to look half decent)

The future is instead of you, one parent, doing all the taping, at the end of the concert all the parents who brought cameras (and focused on their little Suzzie or whoever) will submit their footage to one person to stitch together into a unified whole.

Amara D. Angelica April 9, 2009 · 8:13 am

Bravo, David! What was your audio setup? I’m thinking a remote mic with long cord into the Canon HV30 mic in, avoiding the audio sync problem and getting higher quality?

Final Cut is a $1200 program – hardly cheap, I’d say.

Sounds great! Except it’s not very grass roots if the software you recommend retails for more than $1100.

I’ve been trying to do post-production on some videos with free software and it has been a nightmare. I challenge you to accomplish the same thing with software that one can use on Mac or Windows, for less than $100. Is it possible?

Now, all I need is a way to hook the fancy video camera up to my laptop and use it as a webcam for internet broadcasting.

The only was I can get to broadcast something like this is with a cheap webcam.

I’d love to be able to use a real video cam as a webcam one day.

119,000 followers! you’ve come a long way. remember tweeting this on your now abandoned acct?

“111 followers. Yikes. Maybe I better start Twittering. What’s the best Mac app for Twitter?”

Hi David!

It would be a tremendously encouraging for people who are interested in doing similar things if you could post that video!

Wow, that sounds really cool. I always thought it’d be nifty to do video editing but I don’t have the patience for it. :-p That’d be awesome if you could post the finished product online.

What an awesome idea with the cameras!

I have long wished Sony would make a video in port on a prosumer camcorder, and simple live switching controls, so I could do a two camera shoot by myself, and have it edited when I’m done recording.