All the main political parties are talking about ‘fairness’. They all say inequalities are too big and need to be reduced.
Our guest writers are Professors Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett, authors of The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone and co-founders of The Equality Trust
All the main political parties are talking about ‘fairness’. They all say inequalities are too big and need to be reduced. That is a lot better than not talking about it, but the talk is almost never related to any specific policy commitment to make Britain a fairer society. Today a coalition of academics and charities, including the Equality Trust, is asking party leaders to address this.
The evidence shows that life in societies with smaller income differences between rich and poor is better for almost everyone. Levels of child wellbeing are higher in more equal societies; community life is stronger and people trust each other more.
Even middle class people are likely to live longer, happier lives and are less likely to become victims of violence if they live in more equal societies. Their children are less likely to get involved in drugs, to suffer mental illness, or to become teenage parents. All these benefits of greater equality are within our grasp and it would be a crime to let them slip away from us.
In a recent report, the National Equality Panel said that the next government’s policies to reduce the deficit will be the most important influence on what happens to inequality. The least well off should not have to shoulder the burden of a recession created by the rich.
Nor should the bonus culture be allowed to continue unchecked while unemployment rises. Choices will have to be made between cutting Trident, ID cards or social security benefits, between making income taxes more progressive or increasing VAT.
For the good of our whole society, it is high time policies were assessed for their impact on inequality. That is why a large coalition of charities, including the Equality Trust, has come together and written to the three main party leaders to ask them to commit to a Fairness Test.
This would ensure that major tax or spending changes are rigorously assessed for their impact on inequality. Carried out by the Treasury, an Inequality Impact Assessment would ensure that governments cannot make major changes without being aware of the consequences for inequality and the knock-on effects on the cohesiveness and wellbeing of the whole society.
Such assessments are needed to inform a robust debate on decisions that will have to be taken during the next parliament. The deficit could be reduced in ways which would improve the wellbeing of the whole society, or in ways which would inflict further damage.
Rather than fudging these crucial issues, we need to see our party leaders committing themselves to instituting this Fairness Test and reducing inequality from the start of the next parliament.
To reach hundreds of thousands of new readers and to make the biggest impact we can in the next general election, we need to grow our donor base substantially.
That's why in 2024, we are seeking to generate 150 additional regular donors to support Left Foot Forward's work.
We still need another 124 people to donate to hit the target. You can help. Donate today.
11 Responses to “Policies must be subjected to a “fairness test””
The Equality Trust
RT @leftfootfwd: Policies must be subjected to a "fairness test": http://bit.ly/b4Bqez by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett
SSP Campsie
RT @leftfootfwd Policies must be subjected to a "fairness test": http://short.to/287bq by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett #ge10
Mister Jabberwock
There does seem to be an attempt to say fairness and equality are the same thing. They are very different, at least on the normal definition. On the whole the right want a fair society where people are allowed to prosper according to their contribution and the left want an equal one where no one is left behind. At their extreme either would be terrible, but most of our political debate is about where on the spectrum between them our society should sit.
Both have something to say for them but they are not the same thing. It would have be more truthful to talk about an equality test – as the article makes clear.
GuyAitchison
Policies must be subjected to a “fairness test” – Pickett and Wilkinson @leftfootfwd http://bit.ly/9lsmHe
Will
Mister Jabberwock, I think the Fairness Test as presented by the group of charities is one where greater equality is the consequence of a fair policy. It says that policies to cut the deficit should not impact more on the poor than on the rich – surely this is fair by any definition? If this condition is met then inequality will not increase, and may even go down. In other words, any change in inequality is a consequence and also a measure of the fairness, but not synonymous with it.
I agree that Wilkinson and Pickett are more strident about the society they are aiming for.