SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 55
Download to read offline
The empowered TV & media
consumer’s influence
Ericsson ConsumerLab
Anders Erlandsson, Senior Advisor
Zeynep Ahmet, Senior Advisor
Tv & Media
2015
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 2
Ericsson ConsumerLab annual research
1.1 billion
REPRESENTING
PEOPLE
100,000
RESPONDENTS
15
STUDIED
MEGACITIES
40
MORE THAN
COUNTRIES
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 3
Representing ~680 million Consumers
Qualitative: 30 in-depth interviews (San Francisco, Mexico City, Paris & Stockholm)
Quantitative: 20 000 online interviews (1000/country) age 16-59 + booster >2500 online interviews age 60-69
Base 20 Markets: Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia,
Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
Qualitative and quantitative
Quantitative
14500
measured
android
smartphone
users
8
industry
expert
interviews
Social
media
scanning
6th
ANNUAL
TV and
media study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 4
Half of viewing time
is TV series & movies
Family movies. More than series, family
movies, funny movies. Sometimes I like to
mix, start with children movies and then go
on with action movies and closing with a
funny movie to go to sleep happy.”
- Veronica, 40 years, Mexico
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
30 hours
per week is the average
weekly active viewing time
Average number of self-reported weekly hours of active TV/video viewing,
by gender:
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 5
2011 2015
Streamed on
demand movies
Streamed
on demand
movies
Streamed
on demand TV
Series &
programs
Streamed
on demand
TV Series
Streamed
on demand
TV programs
90%
increase
121%
increase
2,9 h/week
6,0 h/week
45%
of streamed on
demand viewing of
long content is
TV series
TV Series is the
new black
Average number of self reported weekly hours of active TV/video viewing:
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2011 & 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China,
Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
The world of series is so, so huge now,
there’s so many of them. And that’s taken
over from normal films from cinema.”
- Anne, 38 years, France
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 6
1,9
2,3
2,7
3,0
3,8
16 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 59 60-69
Seniors love their
Live News
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-69 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Average nr of self reported hours watching live news per week per age group
>80%
higher average viewing
time of live news
for 60-69 year olds,
than for millennials
(those aged 16-34)
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 7
8%
3%
33%
24%
34%
32%
19%
28%
5%
13%
2015
2011
>3 hours/day At least daily At least weekly Less than weekly Never
YouTube Grows
in importance
Percentage of consumers watching YouTube with different frequency
[global self reported frequency of viewing]
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China,
Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
“My wife fixed our iPad and our
dishwasher by watching YouTube
instruction videos. If a nuclear reactor
started leaking, she would go to YouTube
and then volunteer to fix it.”
- Simon, 44 years, USA
30%
Watch how-to
videos
each week
18%
Watch
gaming
videos
each week
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 8
THE Role of services varies
BETWEEN generations
S-VOD
T-VOD / PPV
DVR
DVD/Blu-ray
S-VOD
Piracy
YouTube
Play/catch-up
Linear TV
YouTube
Play/catch-up
DVR
Linear TV
Secondary servicesOldergenerations
Youngergenerations
Go-to services
Television is
most important.
And YouTube.”
Colette, 61 years old,
France
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 9
Daily Media habits
Percentage of people watching different media types at least once per
day** (global average of self reported frequency of viewing)
Scheduled linear TV Streamed on demand video
(YouTube, short clips, movies,
TV-series & programs)Recorded linear TV
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2010-2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly
in Brazil*, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea*, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US,
* excluded in 2010 figures, ** 3 years moving average Œ, œ, Œ
[Showing: Use once per day or more]
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
~8 IN 10
Teenagers
watch streamed
on demand TV and
video at least once
per day
~8 IN 10
60-69 year olds
watch scheduled
linear TV
at least once
per day
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 10
S-VOD drives
Binge Viewing
87%
of S-VOD
users binge
view at least
once per week,
compared to
74% of non-
SVOD users
47%
74%
81%
60%
87%
93%
Binge view at least once per day
Binge view at least once per week
Binge view at least once every 2nd week
S-VOD Users
non S-VOD users
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Self reported frequency of watching several TV series, other TV
programs or user generated content (UGC) episodes in a row (so
called binge viewing)
>50%
binge daily
5%
never binge
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 11
â€ș Content drives viewing habits
â€ș Popular content has a higher influence
â€ș TV series that release all of a season’s
episodes at once are popular and drive
S-VOD subscriptions
Different viewing
cycles
Over 3,000
people tweeted
that they had
finished the
entire season
within 4 days
Mentions of watching all 13 episodes of ‘House of Cards’
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015
[Social media scanning, Twitter.com]
0
500
1 000
1 500
12-feb-15 17-feb-15 22-feb-15 27-feb-15 04-mar-15 09-mar-15
Posts
‘Game of Thrones’ related tweets over 30 days
Launched
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
13-apr-05 18-apr-05 23-apr-05 28-apr-05 03-maj-05 08-maj-05
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 12
On-demand
Frequency US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: US Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly
>50%
of the studied US
population use
Netflix at least
once a week
41%
27%
6%
8%
5%
4%
4%
5%
1%
3%
4%
3%
2%
2%
1%
1%
71%
52%
19%
19%
13%
12%
9%
9%
9%
8%
6%
6%
5%
3%
2%
2%
YouTube
Netflix
Amazon Prime
Hulu
HBO Go/HBO
Now
ABC.com
Apple iTunes
Xfinity On-
demand
Crackle
Vevo
U-verse On-
demand
Twitch
Vudu
FiOS on demand
Pirate streaming
Pirate File sharing
At least daily
At least weekly
Percent of people using each on-demand service
on a daily vs. weekly basis, US 2015 [self-reported]
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 13
Connected TV Screens
12%
11%
14%
14%
12%
17%
21%
23%
Wii, Xbox, PlayStation
Other Separate box for online
TV/video access
Google Chromecast
Apple TV
Percentage of consumers that have and use
each device [Self-reported]:
Percentage of consumers that do not have, but plan to get
each device [Self-reported]:
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
8
67%
are able to watch internet
content on their TV
screens at home,
and

89%
of these feel they can
access all or most apps
and services
they want!
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 14
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
TV screen Desktop screen Laptop screen Smartphone screen Tablet screen
A shift from Fixed to mobile Devices
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil*, China, Germany,
South Korea*, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, UK and US. * excluded. in 2010 figures, ** 3 years moving average Œ, œ, Œ
Self-reported share of total weekly TV/video viewing time, per year, done on respective
device **
TV screen
& desktop
Smartphone,
tablet & laptop
TV screen
& desktop
Smartphone,
tablet & laptop
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2010-2015 Study
61%
of consumers watch TV
& video on their
smartphones, an
increase of 71% since
2012
42%think it is very important
to watch their TV and
Video content
wherever
they are
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 15
Smartphone video viewing
78%
86%
93%
UK
US
South
Korea
Proportion of smartphone users who watch video content on their smartphone,
ODM measurements
â€ș Majority of smartphone users watch
some or the other video content on
their smartphone
â€ș The phenomenon is typically
dominant in South Korea where
smartphone is the way of life among
its users
Base: Android smartphone users in US, UK and South Korea
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study,
[ConsumerLab Analytical Platform, On-device metering data]
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 16
A CHANGE IN ACCESSING
TV CONTENT
57%
72%
75% 74%
78%
Jan 2014 Apr 2014 Jul 2014 Oct 2014 Jan 2015
Quarterly measurements of smartphone users in the US who access TV apps
(such as ABC, HBO GO, CBS Mobile) at least once on their smartphones
â€ș TV content is being increasingly accessed via smartphones, and its
reach has grown significantly over the past year
Base: US, Users accessing Entertainment TV
content online via smartphones
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015
[comScore MobileMetrix Jan 2015]
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 17
Millennials = Mobile Device viewing
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil*, China, Germany,
South Korea*, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, UK and US. * excluded. in 2010 figures, ** 3 years moving average Œ, œ, Œ
Self-reported share of total weekly TV/video viewing time by age group, done on respective
device **
TV screen
& desktop
Smartphone,
tablet & laptop
TV screen
& desktop
Smartphone,
tablet & laptop
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
16-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-59
TV screen Desktop screen Laptop screen Smartphone screen Tablet screen
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2010-2015 Study
>60%
of all TV/video viewing
hours are spent on a
mobile device screen
among Youngsters
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 18
millennials use the Smartphone too
375
292
200
164
71
54
404
448
368
284
141 101
48%
39%
35%
37%
33%
35%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
55%
60%
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
Smartphones
Tablets
Share of time on Smartphone
Measured average minutes per visitor and month as well as Share of Time by Age Groups –
Entertainment Multimedia*
*Entertainment –Multimedia category in comScore encompasses all paid and free on-demand video services
Base: Users accessing Ent-Multimedia content online via smartphones and tablets
â€ș Entertainment-Multimedia services
are accessed more by younger
consumers on mobile devices
â€ș Though more time is spent on tablets
across age groups, share of time on
smartphone is higher for younger
consumers
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
[comScore MobileMetrix Jan 2015]
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 19
UGC Still dominate
mobile viewing
Mobile viewing is set to change due to
the rapid growth of S-VOD
Percent of consumers that watch each content type on the
Smartphone [self-reported]
4%
4%
5%
6%
6%
6%
7%
8%
8%
9%
11%
33%
Scheduled other TV programs
Live events
Scheduled TV Movies
Streamed, On-demand other TV programs
Scheduled TV series
Live sports
Recorded content
Streamed, On-demand TV series
Streamed, On-demand movies
Live news
Downloaded content
Videos made by other consumers
9%
14%
16%
17%
17%
29%
29%
38%
40%
42%
49%
52%
Streamed, On-demand other TV programs
Video made by other consumers
Streamed, On-demand TV series
Streamed, On-demand movies
Live events
Downloaded content
Live sports
Recorded content
Scheduled other TV programs
Live news
Scheduled TV-series
Scheduled TV Movies
Percent of consumers that watch each content type on the
TV Screen [Self-reported]
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine and US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 20
Smartphone and tablet on equal
footing in terms of short video
202
252
273
588
Youtube
Netflix
Measured average minutes per visitor and month on On-Demand/Streaming
Services [Smartphone Vs. Tablets]
Base: Users accessing YouTube and Netflix via smartphones or tablets respectively
â€ș Tablets and smartphone are
equally preferred for watching
shorter video content
â€ș However, Tablets are preferred
for watching longer format
content like Netflix
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
[comScore MobileMetrix Jan 2015]
Tablets
Smartphones
Smartphones
Tablets
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 21
Coping strategies
â€ș Upgrade to unlimited data plans
â€ș Look for Wi-Fi everywhere
â€ș Watch offline/downloaded content
Seamlessness expected
Regular
commuters
Long-
distance
commuters
Need a
seamless
internet
connection
International
travelers
During
international
stay
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015 [social media scanning, Twitter.com]
“There better be Wi-Fi on my flight...
can't cope with 13 hours without @Netflix.”
#Netflix #HolidaysFollow
“Literally on the longest bus ride and my
3G keeps cutting out so I can’t watch @Netflix”
#Netflix #TravelingFollow
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 22
43%
57%
33%
37%
74%
29% 33%
22%
49%
87%
73%
19%
45%
6% 8%
64%
7% 8% 5%
16%
96%
46%
Weekly Viewing Situations
In bed before
getting up
At home during
the morning
While
commuting
At workplace
or school
At home
during the day
Out and about
in the city
Sitting at
e.g. a café
At
events
At friends’ or
relatives’ homes
At home during
the evening
In bed before
falling asleep
16-19 20-24 25-34
35-44 45-59 60-69
Base: Population aged 16–69 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly in in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
Percentage of consumers that on a weekly basis watch any type of TV/video content in different situations, comparison across
age groups [Self-reported]:
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 23
16%
24%
6%21%
31%
2%
At least daily Weekly Monthly
Less often Never Don’t know
Place- and device
shifting grows
21%
increase in place-
and device shifting
since last year
52%
amongst S-VOD users
place- and device shift!
AT HOME COMMUTING AT WORK INTERNET CAFÉ
Self-reported frequency of watching a specific TV program, show or
movie on one device, interrupt or pause it and then continue
watching it on another device:
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain,
South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
40%
at least once
per week
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 24
71%
80%
88%
29%
20%
12%
US
South Korea
UK
Wi-Fi data consumption Cellular (Mobile) data consumption
Network impact from video usage
Measured proportion of Wi-Fi vs Cellular data being used for
TV and Video apps amongst smartphone video viewers
Base: Android users that watch video content on their smartphones
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
[ConsumerLab Analytical Platform, On-device metering data]
Measured cellular (mobile) data usage ratio for TV and Video apps
amongst smartphone video viewers with 3G vs 4G connections:
2,5
4
3
US
South Korea
UK
X more data4G users
3G
4G users
3G
4G users
3G
X more data
X more data
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 25
Piracy can be beaten
Percent of people using each on-demand service, Spain 2011 vs 2015
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2014-2015 Study
BASE: US and Spain Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly
2%3%
14%
25%26%29%
42%
58%
92%
8%
0%
13%
30%
9%
15%
24%
30%
84% 2015
2011
Percent of people using each on-demand service, US 2011 vs 2015
96%
25%25%22%19%18%16%14%10%7%5%2%
84%
29%32%
9%4%5%2%
2015
2011
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 26
The decision processes
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 27
Today, most consumers receive constant TV and video recommendations from friends, reviews, etc.
This means that the challenge is not necessarily just discovering content, but remembering what to look
for at the moment of viewing.
DISCOVERING AND
REMEMBERING CONTENT
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015
A recommendation
engine should evolve to
include influences the
consumer has had
outside of the service
The content
discovery process
throughout a day
Social recommendations
Influencers, reviews, trailers etc.
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 28
Challenges with current
Recommendation features
Personal recommendation
The fact that some Netflix
recommendations may be so accurate,
leaves the subscriber in shock and
almost generates a feel of a breach in
privacy
Shared accounts
Consumers unhappy with inappropriate
recommendations, is often the result of
shared accounts and profiles with family
and friends
Unrelated recommendations
Some consumers blame the provider for
bad delivery of recommendations, since
they are unable themselves to
understand why they receive it
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
[Social Media scanning, Twitter.com]
“Netflix’s suggestion of
category based on my
viewing ‘Violent Supernatural
Movies from 1980s’. What
does that say about me?”
#RecommendedFollow
“No, netflix, I don’t want
recommendation based on
Merlin, I’m already watching
that”
#Privacy #NetflixFollow
“I opened up my Hulu app
and look at ‘”Shows you
watch” tab, was confused
until I remembered I share
the account”
#Privacy #HuluFollow
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 29
Recommendation
engines fail today
â€ș Recommendation engines are not perceived as
smart enough when recommended titles have
already been watched, are seemingly relevant,
that are too obvious or appear completely weird
and un-related
â€ș Personal recommendations are not perceived
as personal but rather relatively general
â€ș Similar recommendations keep recurring over
and over again
â€ș The recommendations fail to surprise and
inspire
â€ș Social recommendations are perceived as
more useful and reliable
It’s like 1 in 10
recommendations that
you get on Netflix that’s
actually relevant for you

- Johan, 38 years, Sweden
But also people do post like if
they're into like new shows and stuff
like that. They'll be like oh my God
this episode is crazy. And I do trust
those. I got into new genres through
that.”
- Melinda, 28 years, USA
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 30
Consumers ‘default’ when finding
content is too difficult
The consumer stated frequency of difficulty in finding
something to watch on their traditional broadcast TV
service:
10%
7%
28%
19%
31%
Less often
Once per week
Several times per week
Once per day
Several times per day
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
50%
can’t find
anything
to watch at least
once every day
IDEA OF
VIEWING
ACTUAL
VIEWING
DAY 1
ACTUAL
VIEWING
DAY 2
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 31
The guided consumer in traditional
broadcast TV
The greatest influences for consumers in deciding what to watch on
their broadcast TV service:
6%
7%
18%
29%
40%
Recommendations based on
what others who watched this
have also watched
User ratings – Look at how
other users have rated movies,
TV-series
Recommendations from friends
and family
Advertisements (trailers) for TV
programs
Browsing through the titles in
the TV-guide within the service
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Consumers’ perception of the ease of navigating in their broadcast
TV service [Self-reported]:
2%
6%
26%
26%
32%
I find it very difficult to navigate
and find content
I find it difficult to navigate and
find content
I find it neither easy nor difficult
to navigate and find content
I find it very easy to navigate and
find content
I find it easy to navigate and find
content
Only
29%
of broadcast TV viewers
are satisfied with the
quality and level of
detail in their current
TV guide
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 32
Reliance on aid for content discovery
36%
25%
23%
16%
7%
5%
Netflix Users
Overall TV Video Users
Netflix Users
Overall TV Video Users
Netflix Users
Overall TV Video Users
IMDBFandangoMoviefone
Base: 18+ Smartphone Users who visit Netflix or consume TV/Video via their
Smartphones (Browser or App)
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
[comScore MobileMetrix Jan 2015]
Netflix users are more likely to be
dependent on content discovery sites
Measured percentage of smartphone users that watch Netflix or watch TV video on their
smartphones and access different content discovery sites:
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 33
THE PRICE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION
1 in 4 TV/video consumers
are open to providing
personal data to get more
accurate recommendations
Percentage of consumers who
are interested in different
recommendation features for
content and TV services
(self-reported)
Base: Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France,
Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
32%
32%
31%
22%
Personalized TV service offering based on own
viewing habits
Personalized content recommendation based on
own ratings of previously watched content
Personalized content recommendation based on
own viewing habits, age, gender and zip code
Content recommendations that are not based on
any personal information
â€ș OK with out-of-service behavioral tracking
â€ș Actively provide personal information
â€ș OK with in-service behavioral tracking
â€ș OK with providing preferences when opting into the service
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 34
20%
53%
27%
29%
48%
23%
I am very uncomfortable
Indifferent
I am very comfortable
Age 35+
Millennials (age 16-34)
Enough Trust to
provide personal
data Comfort level for consumers with regards to information tracking about
behaviors and preferences , in order to receive an improved viewing
experience [Self-reported]:
1 in 2
consumers trust that
their current TV service
provider handles their
personal data securely
and responsibly
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Millennials have the highest acceptance to providing personal
information to improve recommendations
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 35
7%
17%
10%
15%
40%
11% 8%
17%
9%
14%
37%
15%
Cord cutting remains the same
Cord-cutters over a year ago
Those who once paid for managed TV
but eliminated spending over 12 months ago
Cord-cutters past 12 month
Those who once paid for managed TV
but eliminated spending last year
Cord-shavers past 12 month
Managed TV subscribers who have decreased spending
Cord-nevers
Those who have never paid for managed TV
Corders – unchanged past 12 month
Managed TV subscribers who have not changed spending
Corders – increased past 12 month
Managed TV subscribers who have increased spending
Self-reported changes in household spending on managed
TV services, in the past 12 months, 2014 answers compared to 2015:
20152014
Base: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2014 & 2015 Study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 36
11%
11%
16%
17%
33%
47%
Paying for using other TV/Video internet services
instead (e.g. Netflix, Amazon Prime)
I'm not satisfied with how our managed TV-service
works
No package suits me, I can’t customize my own
package
Using other free TV/Video internet services instead
(e.g. Hulu, YouTube)
Do not watch enough TV to justify the cost
Wanted or needed to save money
reasons to reduce or cut
Self-reported changes in household spending on
managed TV, in the past 12 months:
Reasons to eliminate the household managed TV package:
BASE left graph: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil,
China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
BASE right graph: : Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly, and have reduced or
eliminated their managed TV package in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
8%
17%
9%
14%
37%
15%
Cord-cutters over a year ago
Cord-cutters past 12 month
Cord-shavers past 12 month
Cord-nevers
Corders – unchanged past 12 month
Corders – increased past 12 month
2015
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 37
â€ș An exploding number of options
are available to viewers who
want to ditch their traditional TV
subscriptions but not forsake
their television-watching habits
â€ș With a broadband subscription
and a streaming device, people
have more freedom to pay for
what they want to watch and
decide how they want to watch it
Cord Cutting - An easy choice
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015
[Social media scanning, Twitter.com]
“Apple TV is worth every penny.
Makes cord-cutting so easy!!”
#AppleTVFollow
“I'll ditch cable if Apple releases a TV
streaming service. Might consider Sling TV,
@Hulu and @Netflix too!”
#Apple #SlingTv #Netflix
“Decided that TV isn't important. I’m cutting
the cord! Can you send me your Netflix password?”
#Netflix
Follow
Follow
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 38
No clear value
for cord nevers
Reasons for never paying a managed TV service:
6%
6%
15%
18%
21%
58%
There is too much advertising on
managed TV
My living situation doesn’t allow me
to have a managed TV service
I get all the TV and video content I
need from different other services
(e.g. Netflix, YouTube)
I feel a managed TV service is not
worth the cost
I can’t afford a managed TV service
I have not felt the need to have a
managed TV service
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
[those who have never paid for a managed TV service]
REASONS TO AVOID
â€ș TV providers give little value for money
â€ș Save money
â€ș Limited habits of viewing linear TV
â€ș Linear TV can easily become a time thief in
everyday life
â€ș OTT services are readily available
â€ș Weariness with TV advertising
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 39
Continuing
without A cord
BARRIERS TO PAYING FOR MANAGED TV
Percentage of cord-nevers that may or may not pay for
traditional managed TV services in the future [Self-reported]:
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
[those who have never paid for a managed TV service]
50%
34%
16%
â€ș OTT on demand services already cater to
core needs
â€ș Managed TV feels redundant
â€ș Limited perceived value in increased TV and
video viewing
â€ș More value for money with OTT options
â€ș No acceptance to having binding contracts
No
Don’t know
Yes
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 40
Cord nevers consume less
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 41
29%
37%
15%
19%
43%
15%
12%
8%
18%
75%
56%
In comparison with managed TV consumers, on a daily basis cord-nevers:
â€ș Spend one hour less watching scheduled broadcast movies, series and other programs, as well as live content
â€ș Spend less time viewing downloaded or streamed on-demand series, movies and other programs
â€ș Watch YouTube clips almost as often
The habits of Cord-nevers
In bed before
getting up
At home during
the morning
While
commuting
At workplace
or school
At home
during the day
Out and about
in the city
Sitting at
e.g. a café
At
events
At friends’ or
relatives’ homes
At home during
the evening
In bed before
falling asleep
Cord-cutters over a year ago Cord-shavers past 12 months Cord-cutters past 12 months
Corders – unchanged past 12 months Cord-nevers Corders – increased past 12 months
Base: Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France,
Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 42
ADDING NEW SERVICES
â€ș When managed TV is not an option, consumers actively
search for other services that can cater to their needs,
therefore, their devices may contain numerous apps and
services
PROMINENT Cord-Cutter habits
TABLETS RULE
â€ș More convenient than laptops
â€ș Larger screen than smartphones
â€ș Easy to move around
â€ș Fewer distractions that interrupt viewing
NEW NEWS CHANNELS
Facebook
â€ș Get updates from their network and watch videos
Twitter
â€ș Follow those who post news and watch news clips
YouTube
â€ș Watching highlights on YouTube
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015
“I only watch @HBO Now movies.
What's regular TV?”
#HBO
Follow
“A cord-cutter’s dream: Tivo Roamio
+ Sling TV. Make it happen!”
#TivoRoamio #SlingTV #CordCutting
Follow
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 43
Even though managed TV is up for
negotiation in many households, there
are a number of arguments to keep it.
Rationales for keeping the cord
Old habits
die hard
An easy
option for
relaxation
Best for
background
viewing
Spoilers in
social
media
Still a
household
campfire
Socially
rewarding
experience
Live
content
Premiere
viewing
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015
© Ericsson AB 2015 | TV and media 2015 | 2015-07-20 | Page 43
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 44
28%
35%
40%41%42%
45%
48%48%
55%
19%
29%
26%
39%
45%
36%
45%
41%
52%
Interactive TVDubbed AudioMy TV-/Video
content anywhere
4K/UHD qualityÀ la carte TV-/video
package
Theatrical releasesFree from
ads/commercials
Time shift/On
demand
HD quality
2015
2011
importance of TV Media features-
TRENDS
Percentage of consumers that say each TV Media feature is important
(Showing top 2 answers on 7-graded scale):
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly
in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
[Interest, top 2 answers on 7-graded scale]
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 45
34%
27%
31%
27%
25%
30%
8%
10%
7%
34%
30%
26% 25%
23% 23%
20%
13%
11%
HD quality Free from
ads/commercials
4K / UHDTV quality On demand/Time
shift
À la carte TV-/video
package
Theatrical releases My TV-/Video
content anywhere
Dubbed audio Interactive TV
2011 2015
TV Media features worth paying for –
Trends
Percentage of consumers that say each TV Media feature is worth paying extra for:
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2011 & 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly
in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 46
In search of a new Experience
11%
22%
56%
No, I prefer to get them
from different providers
Yes, even if it costs as
much as the sum of the
individual services
Yes, but only if it helps
me to save money
Percentage of consumers preferring to receive
their TV-service, internet and mobile service from
the same provider [Self-reported]:
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Great overall
experience
Great content
Great flexibility
5%
5%
12%
78%
Yes I have, because I
wanted to wait for a while
until they offered new and
interesting content again
Yes I have, because I
had already seen most of
the titles offered by the
service
Yes I have, because I
wanted to decrease my
TV and entertainment
costs
No I haven’t done this
Percentage of consumers pausing or making any
changes to their OTT subscription for a period of
time [Self-reported]:
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 47
Expectations on Advertising
â€ș Possible to skip ads
â€ș Ad blockers available
â€ș Fewer breaks and often only at the beginning
EASIER TO COPE WITH ONLINE ADS
â€ș Ads ruin the otherwise high quality experience
of watching priority content on the big TV
â€ș Focused viewing on scheduled linear TV is
too interrupted by ads
HIGHER DEMANDS ON THE TV EXPERIENCE
â€ș Online ads have a tendency to be slightly more
relevant/personal
â€ș Online ads are slightly more varied and thus
bearable
ONLINE ADS ARE MORE RELEVANT
Percentage of consumers engaged in other activities in order to avoid watching ads
[Self-reported]:
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 48
Preferred types of
advertising
YouTube has advertisements but you
can skip them in three to five seconds
which is pretty convenient. And I think
because I've just been such an Internet
person from early childhood, I'm pretty
good at tuning out advertisements in
general.”
- Melinda, 28 years, USA
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
43%
of consumers
prefer to watch
personalized
ads based on
viewing habits
and
demographics
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 49
The TV/Media budget
Self-reported household monthly spending
on TV and video related services
48%
9%
3%
6%
9%
25%
~$140/
month
Managed TV
(e.g. cable TV)
S-VOD services
T-VOD services
Buying or renting
physical media
(e.g. DVDs)
Cinema/movie
theater visits
Fixed internet
subscription
Base: US Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media studies 2011–2015
For consumers that are not yet OTT users, the
notion of a TV/video budget seems irrelevant,
yet heavy OTT users feel that they have to keep
track of all the services they pay for and the total
cost.
TV PROVIDER ONLY
Budget is irrelevant
TV PROVIDER + 1 OTT
Budget is not a main concern
MULTIPLE OTT SERVICES
Budget is important
© Ericsson AB 2015 | TV and media 2015 | 2015-07-20 | Page 49
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 50
Self-reported estimated monthly
spending evolution – US
Monthly Media Spending Evolution
Base: US Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media studies 2011–2015
Self-reported estimated monthly
spending breakdown – US
(excluding fixed internet subscriptions)
63%
12%
5%
12%
7%
66%
9%
4%
14%
7%
2014 2015
~$103 ~$105
Managed TV (e.g. cable TV)
S-VOD devices
T-VOD services
Cinema/movie theater visits
Physical media e.g. DVDs)
Physical media
(e.g. DVD)
Cinema/movie theater
T-VOD services
S-VOD services
Managed TV
TOTAL
2011/12 2014/15
86 USD 104 USD
Increase
No change
Increase
Increase
No change
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 51
TV/Video Service Satisfaction
48%
35%
28%
25%
27%
48%
44%
46%
49%
38%Recommendation
Get useful recommendations
Price
The price compared to what I get
Mobility
Ability to watch on any device anywhere
Available content
Amount and type of content
Video quality
Picture and sound
Base: US Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media studies 2015
On-demand TV/video services
Traditional linear TV services
Satisfaction with quality, content, mobility, price and recommendations among those who use it,
anonymized distribution for the US:
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 52
Traditional TV Services vs
on-demand services
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 53
TV has become a combination of linear, on demand capabilities and catch-up services,
which is consequential for managed TV users.
THE WORLD OF ENTERTAINMENT
Linear
channels
T-VOD
Online
catch-up
DVR
TRADITIONAL USER EXPERIENCE USER EXPERIENCE RATIONALE TODAY
World of
entertainmentLinear
channels
T-VOD
Online
catch-up
DVR
S-VOD
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015
TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 54
Embracing the
seamless experience
TV/video consumers are growing increasingly weary of tech,
devices, boxes, remote controls and cables. There’s little added
value in having TV/video technology on display.
Everything should be compatible with
everything
As little ‘intermediary’ technology as
possible
The ‘parts’ of the technology and
hardware setup should preferably not be
visible
Percentage of consumers interested in a TV/video service that combines
live TV with On-demand services on every screen in an integrated
experience including getting everything on one monthly bill:
Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia,
France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report 2015 - Presentation

More Related Content

What's hot

Operators Survival Guide, Episode 2: Show Me the Money – OTT TV Summit 2013
Operators Survival Guide, Episode 2: Show Me the Money – OTT TV Summit 2013Operators Survival Guide, Episode 2: Show Me the Money – OTT TV Summit 2013
Operators Survival Guide, Episode 2: Show Me the Money – OTT TV Summit 2013Viaccess-Orca
 
Ott video report
Ott video reportOtt video report
Ott video reportAmit Goswami
 
Asia OTT Research 2019
Asia OTT Research 2019Asia OTT Research 2019
Asia OTT Research 2019Brightcove Asia
 
Analysys Mason presentation: Why do operators partner with OTT voice providers?
Analysys Mason presentation: Why do operators partner with OTT voice providers? Analysys Mason presentation: Why do operators partner with OTT voice providers?
Analysys Mason presentation: Why do operators partner with OTT voice providers? Stela Bokun
 
Whitepaper: Over-The-Top (OTT) Services: How Operators can overcome the Fragm...
Whitepaper: Over-The-Top (OTT) Services: How Operators can overcome the Fragm...Whitepaper: Over-The-Top (OTT) Services: How Operators can overcome the Fragm...
Whitepaper: Over-The-Top (OTT) Services: How Operators can overcome the Fragm...tyntec
 
The OTT-video services market today's trends and what is next for 4K, HDR, HF...
The OTT-video services market today's trends and what is next for 4K, HDR, HF...The OTT-video services market today's trends and what is next for 4K, HDR, HF...
The OTT-video services market today's trends and what is next for 4K, HDR, HF...Alexey Antropov
 
Connected TV
Connected TVConnected TV
Connected TVGenaro Bardy
 
Market situation of tv industry
Market situation of tv industryMarket situation of tv industry
Market situation of tv industryOleksandra Soroka
 
Global Content Compass 2014
Global Content Compass 2014Global Content Compass 2014
Global Content Compass 2014Christian Knaebel
 
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit Ericsson Slides
 
OTT TV: A Telco threat or opportunity?
OTT TV: A Telco threat or opportunity?OTT TV: A Telco threat or opportunity?
OTT TV: A Telco threat or opportunity?Mohsen Malaki
 
Evolution and Future of TV
Evolution and Future of TV Evolution and Future of TV
Evolution and Future of TV Vishal Sharma
 
Presentation at Consumer Electronics Show - Jan 2009
Presentation at Consumer Electronics Show - Jan 2009Presentation at Consumer Electronics Show - Jan 2009
Presentation at Consumer Electronics Show - Jan 2009Sandeep Pannu
 
Video OTT Platforms Advertising Offer by TMA
Video OTT Platforms Advertising Offer by TMAVideo OTT Platforms Advertising Offer by TMA
Video OTT Platforms Advertising Offer by TMAmediaant
 
Change Trends & Broadcasting
Change Trends & BroadcastingChange Trends & Broadcasting
Change Trends & BroadcastingBen Dair
 
TV and the Second Screen: A Red Bee Media and Decipher white paper
TV and the Second Screen: A Red Bee Media and Decipher white paperTV and the Second Screen: A Red Bee Media and Decipher white paper
TV and the Second Screen: A Red Bee Media and Decipher white paperMIP Markets
 
OTT Video Platform Infographic
OTT Video Platform InfographicOTT Video Platform Infographic
OTT Video Platform InfographicPetr Nemec
 
A Hands-On Intro to Today's Connected Home
A Hands-On Intro to Today's Connected HomeA Hands-On Intro to Today's Connected Home
A Hands-On Intro to Today's Connected HomeHomeSphere, Inc.
 
OTT Video Trends and Opportunity (2018)
OTT Video Trends and Opportunity (2018)OTT Video Trends and Opportunity (2018)
OTT Video Trends and Opportunity (2018)MC[CO] Labs
 

What's hot (20)

Operators Survival Guide, Episode 2: Show Me the Money – OTT TV Summit 2013
Operators Survival Guide, Episode 2: Show Me the Money – OTT TV Summit 2013Operators Survival Guide, Episode 2: Show Me the Money – OTT TV Summit 2013
Operators Survival Guide, Episode 2: Show Me the Money – OTT TV Summit 2013
 
Future TV 2025
Future TV 2025Future TV 2025
Future TV 2025
 
Ott video report
Ott video reportOtt video report
Ott video report
 
Asia OTT Research 2019
Asia OTT Research 2019Asia OTT Research 2019
Asia OTT Research 2019
 
Analysys Mason presentation: Why do operators partner with OTT voice providers?
Analysys Mason presentation: Why do operators partner with OTT voice providers? Analysys Mason presentation: Why do operators partner with OTT voice providers?
Analysys Mason presentation: Why do operators partner with OTT voice providers?
 
Whitepaper: Over-The-Top (OTT) Services: How Operators can overcome the Fragm...
Whitepaper: Over-The-Top (OTT) Services: How Operators can overcome the Fragm...Whitepaper: Over-The-Top (OTT) Services: How Operators can overcome the Fragm...
Whitepaper: Over-The-Top (OTT) Services: How Operators can overcome the Fragm...
 
The OTT-video services market today's trends and what is next for 4K, HDR, HF...
The OTT-video services market today's trends and what is next for 4K, HDR, HF...The OTT-video services market today's trends and what is next for 4K, HDR, HF...
The OTT-video services market today's trends and what is next for 4K, HDR, HF...
 
Connected TV
Connected TVConnected TV
Connected TV
 
Market situation of tv industry
Market situation of tv industryMarket situation of tv industry
Market situation of tv industry
 
Global Content Compass 2014
Global Content Compass 2014Global Content Compass 2014
Global Content Compass 2014
 
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
 
OTT TV: A Telco threat or opportunity?
OTT TV: A Telco threat or opportunity?OTT TV: A Telco threat or opportunity?
OTT TV: A Telco threat or opportunity?
 
Evolution and Future of TV
Evolution and Future of TV Evolution and Future of TV
Evolution and Future of TV
 
Presentation at Consumer Electronics Show - Jan 2009
Presentation at Consumer Electronics Show - Jan 2009Presentation at Consumer Electronics Show - Jan 2009
Presentation at Consumer Electronics Show - Jan 2009
 
Video OTT Platforms Advertising Offer by TMA
Video OTT Platforms Advertising Offer by TMAVideo OTT Platforms Advertising Offer by TMA
Video OTT Platforms Advertising Offer by TMA
 
Change Trends & Broadcasting
Change Trends & BroadcastingChange Trends & Broadcasting
Change Trends & Broadcasting
 
TV and the Second Screen: A Red Bee Media and Decipher white paper
TV and the Second Screen: A Red Bee Media and Decipher white paperTV and the Second Screen: A Red Bee Media and Decipher white paper
TV and the Second Screen: A Red Bee Media and Decipher white paper
 
OTT Video Platform Infographic
OTT Video Platform InfographicOTT Video Platform Infographic
OTT Video Platform Infographic
 
A Hands-On Intro to Today's Connected Home
A Hands-On Intro to Today's Connected HomeA Hands-On Intro to Today's Connected Home
A Hands-On Intro to Today's Connected Home
 
OTT Video Trends and Opportunity (2018)
OTT Video Trends and Opportunity (2018)OTT Video Trends and Opportunity (2018)
OTT Video Trends and Opportunity (2018)
 

Viewers also liked

Sleeping Giants: Digital Awakens TV and Media
Sleeping Giants: Digital Awakens TV and MediaSleeping Giants: Digital Awakens TV and Media
Sleeping Giants: Digital Awakens TV and MediaRazorfish
 
Jadual tutorial
Jadual tutorialJadual tutorial
Jadual tutorialjcfeng16
 
Teenage media consumption
Teenage media consumptionTeenage media consumption
Teenage media consumptionferehiwot
 
Motivators for the intention to use mobile TV
Motivators for the intention to use mobile TVMotivators for the intention to use mobile TV
Motivators for the intention to use mobile TVCathy Britt
 
How to Use Anatomy TV
How to Use Anatomy TVHow to Use Anatomy TV
How to Use Anatomy TVDiana Bang
 
Mediapowerpoint
MediapowerpointMediapowerpoint
MediapowerpointJSLatrach
 
DrugInfo seminar: Long-term problematic alcohol use and the older person
DrugInfo seminar: Long-term problematic alcohol use and the older personDrugInfo seminar: Long-term problematic alcohol use and the older person
DrugInfo seminar: Long-term problematic alcohol use and the older personAustralian Drug Foundation
 
91% of Samsung Smart TV users in Spain use specific applications for series a...
91% of Samsung Smart TV users in Spain use specific applications for series a...91% of Samsung Smart TV users in Spain use specific applications for series a...
91% of Samsung Smart TV users in Spain use specific applications for series a...The Cocktail Analysis
 
Internet of things
Internet of thingsInternet of things
Internet of thingsnikitha1605
 
Brainfood Entertainment TV, Game, Online Programmng Strategy
Brainfood Entertainment TV, Game, Online Programmng StrategyBrainfood Entertainment TV, Game, Online Programmng Strategy
Brainfood Entertainment TV, Game, Online Programmng StrategyLarry Ross
 
Edelman Social Entertainment &Trust in the Entertainment Industry
Edelman Social Entertainment &Trust in the Entertainment Industry Edelman Social Entertainment &Trust in the Entertainment Industry
Edelman Social Entertainment &Trust in the Entertainment Industry Edelman
 
3DTV Broadcasting
3DTV Broadcasting3DTV Broadcasting
3DTV Broadcastingnageshkinik
 
Atps demonstraçoes
Atps demonstraçoesAtps demonstraçoes
Atps demonstraçoesJonatan Savian
 
3DTV - Past, Present and Future
3DTV - Past, Present and Future3DTV - Past, Present and Future
3DTV - Past, Present and FutureTouradj Ebrahimi
 
Radio Tv Pr Techniques
Radio Tv Pr TechniquesRadio Tv Pr Techniques
Radio Tv Pr TechniquesBrett Atwood
 
OM: TV and Media
OM: TV and MediaOM: TV and Media
OM: TV and MediaOptiva Media
 

Viewers also liked (19)

Sleeping Giants: Digital Awakens TV and Media
Sleeping Giants: Digital Awakens TV and MediaSleeping Giants: Digital Awakens TV and Media
Sleeping Giants: Digital Awakens TV and Media
 
Jadual tutorial
Jadual tutorialJadual tutorial
Jadual tutorial
 
Teenage media consumption
Teenage media consumptionTeenage media consumption
Teenage media consumption
 
Motivators for the intention to use mobile TV
Motivators for the intention to use mobile TVMotivators for the intention to use mobile TV
Motivators for the intention to use mobile TV
 
How to Use Anatomy TV
How to Use Anatomy TVHow to Use Anatomy TV
How to Use Anatomy TV
 
2014/5 G-Club International Media Kit
2014/5 G-Club International Media Kit2014/5 G-Club International Media Kit
2014/5 G-Club International Media Kit
 
Mediapowerpoint
MediapowerpointMediapowerpoint
Mediapowerpoint
 
DrugInfo seminar: Long-term problematic alcohol use and the older person
DrugInfo seminar: Long-term problematic alcohol use and the older personDrugInfo seminar: Long-term problematic alcohol use and the older person
DrugInfo seminar: Long-term problematic alcohol use and the older person
 
91% of Samsung Smart TV users in Spain use specific applications for series a...
91% of Samsung Smart TV users in Spain use specific applications for series a...91% of Samsung Smart TV users in Spain use specific applications for series a...
91% of Samsung Smart TV users in Spain use specific applications for series a...
 
Internet of things
Internet of thingsInternet of things
Internet of things
 
Brainfood Entertainment TV, Game, Online Programmng Strategy
Brainfood Entertainment TV, Game, Online Programmng StrategyBrainfood Entertainment TV, Game, Online Programmng Strategy
Brainfood Entertainment TV, Game, Online Programmng Strategy
 
Edelman Social Entertainment &Trust in the Entertainment Industry
Edelman Social Entertainment &Trust in the Entertainment Industry Edelman Social Entertainment &Trust in the Entertainment Industry
Edelman Social Entertainment &Trust in the Entertainment Industry
 
Mobile TV Use Cases
Mobile TV Use CasesMobile TV Use Cases
Mobile TV Use Cases
 
3DTV Broadcasting
3DTV Broadcasting3DTV Broadcasting
3DTV Broadcasting
 
Atps demonstraçoes
Atps demonstraçoesAtps demonstraçoes
Atps demonstraçoes
 
3DTV - Past, Present and Future
3DTV - Past, Present and Future3DTV - Past, Present and Future
3DTV - Past, Present and Future
 
Assessing 3DTV QoE and beyond a look on testing methodologies
Assessing 3DTV QoE and beyond a look on testing methodologiesAssessing 3DTV QoE and beyond a look on testing methodologies
Assessing 3DTV QoE and beyond a look on testing methodologies
 
Radio Tv Pr Techniques
Radio Tv Pr TechniquesRadio Tv Pr Techniques
Radio Tv Pr Techniques
 
OM: TV and Media
OM: TV and MediaOM: TV and Media
OM: TV and Media
 

Similar to Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report 2015 - Presentation

An Ericsson Consumer Insight Report : TV and Media 2015
An Ericsson Consumer Insight Report : TV and Media 2015An Ericsson Consumer Insight Report : TV and Media 2015
An Ericsson Consumer Insight Report : TV and Media 2015WiseKnow Thailand
 
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015Marketing Media Review
 
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015MĂźrzac Iulian
 
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015Marketing Media Review
 
Ericsson tv and_media_2013_study_presentation_v3
Ericsson tv and_media_2013_study_presentation_v3Ericsson tv and_media_2013_study_presentation_v3
Ericsson tv and_media_2013_study_presentation_v3Celso Araujo
 
DWS15 - TV & Video Forum - Can the internet handle everything ? - Florence Le...
DWS15 - TV & Video Forum - Can the internet handle everything ? - Florence Le...DWS15 - TV & Video Forum - Can the internet handle everything ? - Florence Le...
DWS15 - TV & Video Forum - Can the internet handle everything ? - Florence Le...IDATE DigiWorld
 
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and Media 2013 Presentation
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and Media 2013 PresentationEricsson ConsumerLab TV and Media 2013 Presentation
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and Media 2013 PresentationEricsson
 
Dr Hamish McPharlin - Breakfast & Brains
Dr Hamish McPharlin - Breakfast & BrainsDr Hamish McPharlin - Breakfast & Brains
Dr Hamish McPharlin - Breakfast & BrainsJonathan Gardiner
 
Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report
Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media reportEricsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report
Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media reportEricsson
 
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit Ericsson
 
Youtube basic reach - by Google
Youtube basic reach - by GoogleYoutube basic reach - by Google
Youtube basic reach - by GoogleMarco Ma
 
Think TV - TV Effectiveness
Think TV -  TV EffectivenessThink TV -  TV Effectiveness
Think TV - TV EffectivenessThink TV
 
The OTT Reality Check
The OTT Reality CheckThe OTT Reality Check
The OTT Reality CheckAOLAdvertising
 
Media and Mobile Trends 2015: Where and How Are Consumers Tuning In?
Media and Mobile Trends 2015: Where and How Are Consumers Tuning In?Media and Mobile Trends 2015: Where and How Are Consumers Tuning In?
Media and Mobile Trends 2015: Where and How Are Consumers Tuning In?Deloitte United States
 
1Finity Final Presentation (Light Version)
1Finity Final Presentation (Light Version)1Finity Final Presentation (Light Version)
1Finity Final Presentation (Light Version)Vincent Ledoux
 
Next Gen User Experiences for MultiScreen Services
Next Gen User Experiences for MultiScreen ServicesNext Gen User Experiences for MultiScreen Services
Next Gen User Experiences for MultiScreen ServicesChristophe Rufin
 
Np tv the-social-medium-final-21-nov-2014
Np tv the-social-medium-final-21-nov-2014Np tv the-social-medium-final-21-nov-2014
Np tv the-social-medium-final-21-nov-2014OptimediaSpain
 
Comscore: The U.S. Total Video Report
Comscore: The U.S. Total Video Report Comscore: The U.S. Total Video Report
Comscore: The U.S. Total Video Report Ari Fadyl
 
Television 2013_Digital Disruption_UOIT Innovation Conference Presentation
Television 2013_Digital Disruption_UOIT Innovation Conference PresentationTelevision 2013_Digital Disruption_UOIT Innovation Conference Presentation
Television 2013_Digital Disruption_UOIT Innovation Conference PresentationSusan Dineen
 
7 Killer Facts About Advertising
7 Killer Facts About Advertising7 Killer Facts About Advertising
7 Killer Facts About Advertisinggeorginarees
 

Similar to Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report 2015 - Presentation (20)

An Ericsson Consumer Insight Report : TV and Media 2015
An Ericsson Consumer Insight Report : TV and Media 2015An Ericsson Consumer Insight Report : TV and Media 2015
An Ericsson Consumer Insight Report : TV and Media 2015
 
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
 
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015
 
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
Ericsson consumer lab-tv-media-2015
 
Ericsson tv and_media_2013_study_presentation_v3
Ericsson tv and_media_2013_study_presentation_v3Ericsson tv and_media_2013_study_presentation_v3
Ericsson tv and_media_2013_study_presentation_v3
 
DWS15 - TV & Video Forum - Can the internet handle everything ? - Florence Le...
DWS15 - TV & Video Forum - Can the internet handle everything ? - Florence Le...DWS15 - TV & Video Forum - Can the internet handle everything ? - Florence Le...
DWS15 - TV & Video Forum - Can the internet handle everything ? - Florence Le...
 
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and Media 2013 Presentation
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and Media 2013 PresentationEricsson ConsumerLab TV and Media 2013 Presentation
Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and Media 2013 Presentation
 
Dr Hamish McPharlin - Breakfast & Brains
Dr Hamish McPharlin - Breakfast & BrainsDr Hamish McPharlin - Breakfast & Brains
Dr Hamish McPharlin - Breakfast & Brains
 
Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report
Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media reportEricsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report
Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report
 
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
TV & Video: An Analysis of Consumer Habit
 
Youtube basic reach - by Google
Youtube basic reach - by GoogleYoutube basic reach - by Google
Youtube basic reach - by Google
 
Think TV - TV Effectiveness
Think TV -  TV EffectivenessThink TV -  TV Effectiveness
Think TV - TV Effectiveness
 
The OTT Reality Check
The OTT Reality CheckThe OTT Reality Check
The OTT Reality Check
 
Media and Mobile Trends 2015: Where and How Are Consumers Tuning In?
Media and Mobile Trends 2015: Where and How Are Consumers Tuning In?Media and Mobile Trends 2015: Where and How Are Consumers Tuning In?
Media and Mobile Trends 2015: Where and How Are Consumers Tuning In?
 
1Finity Final Presentation (Light Version)
1Finity Final Presentation (Light Version)1Finity Final Presentation (Light Version)
1Finity Final Presentation (Light Version)
 
Next Gen User Experiences for MultiScreen Services
Next Gen User Experiences for MultiScreen ServicesNext Gen User Experiences for MultiScreen Services
Next Gen User Experiences for MultiScreen Services
 
Np tv the-social-medium-final-21-nov-2014
Np tv the-social-medium-final-21-nov-2014Np tv the-social-medium-final-21-nov-2014
Np tv the-social-medium-final-21-nov-2014
 
Comscore: The U.S. Total Video Report
Comscore: The U.S. Total Video Report Comscore: The U.S. Total Video Report
Comscore: The U.S. Total Video Report
 
Television 2013_Digital Disruption_UOIT Innovation Conference Presentation
Television 2013_Digital Disruption_UOIT Innovation Conference PresentationTelevision 2013_Digital Disruption_UOIT Innovation Conference Presentation
Television 2013_Digital Disruption_UOIT Innovation Conference Presentation
 
7 Killer Facts About Advertising
7 Killer Facts About Advertising7 Killer Facts About Advertising
7 Killer Facts About Advertising
 

More from Ericsson

Ericsson Technology Review: Versatile Video Coding explained – the future of ...
Ericsson Technology Review: Versatile Video Coding explained – the future of ...Ericsson Technology Review: Versatile Video Coding explained – the future of ...
Ericsson Technology Review: Versatile Video Coding explained – the future of ...Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 2, 2020
 Ericsson Technology Review: issue 2, 2020 Ericsson Technology Review: issue 2, 2020
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 2, 2020Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Integrated access and backhaul – a new type of wi...
Ericsson Technology Review: Integrated access and backhaul – a new type of wi...Ericsson Technology Review: Integrated access and backhaul – a new type of wi...
Ericsson Technology Review: Integrated access and backhaul – a new type of wi...Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Critical IoT connectivity: Ideal for time-critica...
Ericsson Technology Review: Critical IoT connectivity: Ideal for time-critica...Ericsson Technology Review: Critical IoT connectivity: Ideal for time-critica...
Ericsson Technology Review: Critical IoT connectivity: Ideal for time-critica...Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G evolution: 3GPP releases 16 & 17 overview (upd...
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G evolution: 3GPP releases 16 & 17 overview (upd...Ericsson Technology Review: 5G evolution: 3GPP releases 16 & 17 overview (upd...
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G evolution: 3GPP releases 16 & 17 overview (upd...Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: The future of cloud computing: Highly distributed...
Ericsson Technology Review: The future of cloud computing: Highly distributed...Ericsson Technology Review: The future of cloud computing: Highly distributed...
Ericsson Technology Review: The future of cloud computing: Highly distributed...Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Optimizing UICC modules for IoT applications
Ericsson Technology Review: Optimizing UICC modules for IoT applicationsEricsson Technology Review: Optimizing UICC modules for IoT applications
Ericsson Technology Review: Optimizing UICC modules for IoT applicationsEricsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 1, 2020
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 1, 2020Ericsson Technology Review: issue 1, 2020
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 1, 2020Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G BSS: Evolving BSS to fit the 5G economy
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G BSS: Evolving BSS to fit the 5G economyEricsson Technology Review: 5G BSS: Evolving BSS to fit the 5G economy
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G BSS: Evolving BSS to fit the 5G economyEricsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G migration strategy from EPS to 5G system
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G migration strategy from EPS to 5G systemEricsson Technology Review: 5G migration strategy from EPS to 5G system
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G migration strategy from EPS to 5G systemEricsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Creating the next-generation edge-cloud ecosystem
Ericsson Technology Review: Creating the next-generation edge-cloud ecosystemEricsson Technology Review: Creating the next-generation edge-cloud ecosystem
Ericsson Technology Review: Creating the next-generation edge-cloud ecosystemEricsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Issue 2/2019
Ericsson Technology Review: Issue 2/2019Ericsson Technology Review: Issue 2/2019
Ericsson Technology Review: Issue 2/2019Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Spotlight on the Internet of Things
Ericsson Technology Review: Spotlight on the Internet of ThingsEricsson Technology Review: Spotlight on the Internet of Things
Ericsson Technology Review: Spotlight on the Internet of ThingsEricsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review - Technology Trends 2019
Ericsson Technology Review - Technology Trends 2019Ericsson Technology Review - Technology Trends 2019
Ericsson Technology Review - Technology Trends 2019Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Driving transformation in the automotive and road...
Ericsson Technology Review: Driving transformation in the automotive and road...Ericsson Technology Review: Driving transformation in the automotive and road...
Ericsson Technology Review: Driving transformation in the automotive and road...Ericsson
 
SD-WAN Orchestration
SD-WAN OrchestrationSD-WAN Orchestration
SD-WAN OrchestrationEricsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G-TSN integration meets networking requirements ...
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G-TSN integration meets networking requirements ...Ericsson Technology Review: 5G-TSN integration meets networking requirements ...
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G-TSN integration meets networking requirements ...Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Meeting 5G latency requirements with inactive state
Ericsson Technology Review: Meeting 5G latency requirements with inactive stateEricsson Technology Review: Meeting 5G latency requirements with inactive state
Ericsson Technology Review: Meeting 5G latency requirements with inactive stateEricsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Cloud-native application design in the telecom do...
Ericsson Technology Review: Cloud-native application design in the telecom do...Ericsson Technology Review: Cloud-native application design in the telecom do...
Ericsson Technology Review: Cloud-native application design in the telecom do...Ericsson
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Service exposure: a critical capability in a 5G w...
Ericsson Technology Review: Service exposure: a critical capability in a 5G w...Ericsson Technology Review: Service exposure: a critical capability in a 5G w...
Ericsson Technology Review: Service exposure: a critical capability in a 5G w...Ericsson
 

More from Ericsson (20)

Ericsson Technology Review: Versatile Video Coding explained – the future of ...
Ericsson Technology Review: Versatile Video Coding explained – the future of ...Ericsson Technology Review: Versatile Video Coding explained – the future of ...
Ericsson Technology Review: Versatile Video Coding explained – the future of ...
 
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 2, 2020
 Ericsson Technology Review: issue 2, 2020 Ericsson Technology Review: issue 2, 2020
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 2, 2020
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Integrated access and backhaul – a new type of wi...
Ericsson Technology Review: Integrated access and backhaul – a new type of wi...Ericsson Technology Review: Integrated access and backhaul – a new type of wi...
Ericsson Technology Review: Integrated access and backhaul – a new type of wi...
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Critical IoT connectivity: Ideal for time-critica...
Ericsson Technology Review: Critical IoT connectivity: Ideal for time-critica...Ericsson Technology Review: Critical IoT connectivity: Ideal for time-critica...
Ericsson Technology Review: Critical IoT connectivity: Ideal for time-critica...
 
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G evolution: 3GPP releases 16 & 17 overview (upd...
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G evolution: 3GPP releases 16 & 17 overview (upd...Ericsson Technology Review: 5G evolution: 3GPP releases 16 & 17 overview (upd...
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G evolution: 3GPP releases 16 & 17 overview (upd...
 
Ericsson Technology Review: The future of cloud computing: Highly distributed...
Ericsson Technology Review: The future of cloud computing: Highly distributed...Ericsson Technology Review: The future of cloud computing: Highly distributed...
Ericsson Technology Review: The future of cloud computing: Highly distributed...
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Optimizing UICC modules for IoT applications
Ericsson Technology Review: Optimizing UICC modules for IoT applicationsEricsson Technology Review: Optimizing UICC modules for IoT applications
Ericsson Technology Review: Optimizing UICC modules for IoT applications
 
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 1, 2020
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 1, 2020Ericsson Technology Review: issue 1, 2020
Ericsson Technology Review: issue 1, 2020
 
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G BSS: Evolving BSS to fit the 5G economy
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G BSS: Evolving BSS to fit the 5G economyEricsson Technology Review: 5G BSS: Evolving BSS to fit the 5G economy
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G BSS: Evolving BSS to fit the 5G economy
 
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G migration strategy from EPS to 5G system
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G migration strategy from EPS to 5G systemEricsson Technology Review: 5G migration strategy from EPS to 5G system
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G migration strategy from EPS to 5G system
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Creating the next-generation edge-cloud ecosystem
Ericsson Technology Review: Creating the next-generation edge-cloud ecosystemEricsson Technology Review: Creating the next-generation edge-cloud ecosystem
Ericsson Technology Review: Creating the next-generation edge-cloud ecosystem
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Issue 2/2019
Ericsson Technology Review: Issue 2/2019Ericsson Technology Review: Issue 2/2019
Ericsson Technology Review: Issue 2/2019
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Spotlight on the Internet of Things
Ericsson Technology Review: Spotlight on the Internet of ThingsEricsson Technology Review: Spotlight on the Internet of Things
Ericsson Technology Review: Spotlight on the Internet of Things
 
Ericsson Technology Review - Technology Trends 2019
Ericsson Technology Review - Technology Trends 2019Ericsson Technology Review - Technology Trends 2019
Ericsson Technology Review - Technology Trends 2019
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Driving transformation in the automotive and road...
Ericsson Technology Review: Driving transformation in the automotive and road...Ericsson Technology Review: Driving transformation in the automotive and road...
Ericsson Technology Review: Driving transformation in the automotive and road...
 
SD-WAN Orchestration
SD-WAN OrchestrationSD-WAN Orchestration
SD-WAN Orchestration
 
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G-TSN integration meets networking requirements ...
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G-TSN integration meets networking requirements ...Ericsson Technology Review: 5G-TSN integration meets networking requirements ...
Ericsson Technology Review: 5G-TSN integration meets networking requirements ...
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Meeting 5G latency requirements with inactive state
Ericsson Technology Review: Meeting 5G latency requirements with inactive stateEricsson Technology Review: Meeting 5G latency requirements with inactive state
Ericsson Technology Review: Meeting 5G latency requirements with inactive state
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Cloud-native application design in the telecom do...
Ericsson Technology Review: Cloud-native application design in the telecom do...Ericsson Technology Review: Cloud-native application design in the telecom do...
Ericsson Technology Review: Cloud-native application design in the telecom do...
 
Ericsson Technology Review: Service exposure: a critical capability in a 5G w...
Ericsson Technology Review: Service exposure: a critical capability in a 5G w...Ericsson Technology Review: Service exposure: a critical capability in a 5G w...
Ericsson Technology Review: Service exposure: a critical capability in a 5G w...
 

Recently uploaded

Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticscarlostorres15106
 
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDGAPIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDGMarianaLemus7
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Enterprise Knowledge
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Scott Keck-Warren
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationRidwan Fadjar
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationSafe Software
 
Science&tech:THE INFORMATION AGE STS.pdf
Science&tech:THE INFORMATION AGE STS.pdfScience&tech:THE INFORMATION AGE STS.pdf
Science&tech:THE INFORMATION AGE STS.pdfjimielynbastida
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks..."LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...Fwdays
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...shyamraj55
 
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptxMaking_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptxnull - The Open Security Community
 
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power SystemsUnlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power SystemsPrecisely
 
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024Neo4j
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024BookNet Canada
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions
 

Recently uploaded (20)

E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptxE-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
E-Vehicle_Hacking_by_Parul Sharma_null_owasp.pptx
 
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmaticsKotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
Kotlin Multiplatform & Compose Multiplatform - Starter kit for pragmatics
 
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDGAPIForce Zurich 5 April  Automation LPDG
APIForce Zurich 5 April Automation LPDG
 
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
Designing IA for AI - Information Architecture Conference 2024
 
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
Advanced Test Driven-Development @ php[tek] 2024
 
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 PresentationMy Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
My Hashitalk Indonesia April 2024 Presentation
 
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry InnovationBeyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
Beyond Boundaries: Leveraging No-Code Solutions for Industry Innovation
 
Science&tech:THE INFORMATION AGE STS.pdf
Science&tech:THE INFORMATION AGE STS.pdfScience&tech:THE INFORMATION AGE STS.pdf
Science&tech:THE INFORMATION AGE STS.pdf
 
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: New from BookNet Canada for 2024: BNC BiblioShare - Tech Forum 2024
 
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks..."LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
"LLMs for Python Engineers: Advanced Data Analysis and Semantic Kernel",Oleks...
 
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special EditionDMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
DMCC Future of Trade Web3 - Special Edition
 
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
#StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
Automating Business Process via MuleSoft Composer | Bangalore MuleSoft Meetup...
 
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptxMaking_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
Making_way_through_DLL_hollowing_inspite_of_CFG_by_Debjeet Banerjee.pptx
 
Hot Sexy call girls in Panjabi Bagh 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
Hot Sexy call girls in Panjabi Bagh 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort ServiceHot Sexy call girls in Panjabi Bagh 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
Hot Sexy call girls in Panjabi Bagh 🔝 9953056974 🔝 Delhi escort Service
 
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power SystemsUnlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
Unlocking the Potential of the Cloud for IBM Power Systems
 
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
Build your next Gen AI Breakthrough - April 2024
 
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
Transcript: #StandardsGoals for 2024: What’s new for BISAC - Tech Forum 2024
 
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptxVulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
Vulnerability_Management_GRC_by Sohang Sengupta.pptx
 
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food ManufacturingPigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
Pigging Solutions in Pet Food Manufacturing
 

Ericsson ConsumerLab, annual TV & Media report 2015 - Presentation

  • 1. The empowered TV & media consumer’s influence Ericsson ConsumerLab Anders Erlandsson, Senior Advisor Zeynep Ahmet, Senior Advisor Tv & Media 2015
  • 2. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 2 Ericsson ConsumerLab annual research 1.1 billion REPRESENTING PEOPLE 100,000 RESPONDENTS 15 STUDIED MEGACITIES 40 MORE THAN COUNTRIES
  • 3. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 3 Representing ~680 million Consumers Qualitative: 30 in-depth interviews (San Francisco, Mexico City, Paris & Stockholm) Quantitative: 20 000 online interviews (1000/country) age 16-59 + booster >2500 online interviews age 60-69 Base 20 Markets: Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study Qualitative and quantitative Quantitative 14500 measured android smartphone users 8 industry expert interviews Social media scanning 6th ANNUAL TV and media study
  • 4. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 4 Half of viewing time is TV series & movies Family movies. More than series, family movies, funny movies. Sometimes I like to mix, start with children movies and then go on with action movies and closing with a funny movie to go to sleep happy.” - Veronica, 40 years, Mexico Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US 30 hours per week is the average weekly active viewing time Average number of self-reported weekly hours of active TV/video viewing, by gender:
  • 5. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 5 2011 2015 Streamed on demand movies Streamed on demand movies Streamed on demand TV Series & programs Streamed on demand TV Series Streamed on demand TV programs 90% increase 121% increase 2,9 h/week 6,0 h/week 45% of streamed on demand viewing of long content is TV series TV Series is the new black Average number of self reported weekly hours of active TV/video viewing: Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2011 & 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US The world of series is so, so huge now, there’s so many of them. And that’s taken over from normal films from cinema.” - Anne, 38 years, France
  • 6. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 6 1,9 2,3 2,7 3,0 3,8 16 - 24 25 - 34 35 - 44 45 - 59 60-69 Seniors love their Live News Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-69 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Average nr of self reported hours watching live news per week per age group >80% higher average viewing time of live news for 60-69 year olds, than for millennials (those aged 16-34)
  • 7. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 7 8% 3% 33% 24% 34% 32% 19% 28% 5% 13% 2015 2011 >3 hours/day At least daily At least weekly Less than weekly Never YouTube Grows in importance Percentage of consumers watching YouTube with different frequency [global self reported frequency of viewing] Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US “My wife fixed our iPad and our dishwasher by watching YouTube instruction videos. If a nuclear reactor started leaking, she would go to YouTube and then volunteer to fix it.” - Simon, 44 years, USA 30% Watch how-to videos each week 18% Watch gaming videos each week
  • 8. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 8 THE Role of services varies BETWEEN generations S-VOD T-VOD / PPV DVR DVD/Blu-ray S-VOD Piracy YouTube Play/catch-up Linear TV YouTube Play/catch-up DVR Linear TV Secondary servicesOldergenerations Youngergenerations Go-to services Television is most important. And YouTube.” Colette, 61 years old, France
  • 9. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 9 Daily Media habits Percentage of people watching different media types at least once per day** (global average of self reported frequency of viewing) Scheduled linear TV Streamed on demand video (YouTube, short clips, movies, TV-series & programs)Recorded linear TV Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2010-2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil*, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea*, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US, * excluded in 2010 figures, ** 3 years moving average ÂŒ, Âœ, ÂŒ [Showing: Use once per day or more] 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 ~8 IN 10 Teenagers watch streamed on demand TV and video at least once per day ~8 IN 10 60-69 year olds watch scheduled linear TV at least once per day
  • 10. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 10 S-VOD drives Binge Viewing 87% of S-VOD users binge view at least once per week, compared to 74% of non- SVOD users 47% 74% 81% 60% 87% 93% Binge view at least once per day Binge view at least once per week Binge view at least once every 2nd week S-VOD Users non S-VOD users Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Self reported frequency of watching several TV series, other TV programs or user generated content (UGC) episodes in a row (so called binge viewing) >50% binge daily 5% never binge
  • 11. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 11 â€ș Content drives viewing habits â€ș Popular content has a higher influence â€ș TV series that release all of a season’s episodes at once are popular and drive S-VOD subscriptions Different viewing cycles Over 3,000 people tweeted that they had finished the entire season within 4 days Mentions of watching all 13 episodes of ‘House of Cards’ Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015 [Social media scanning, Twitter.com] 0 500 1 000 1 500 12-feb-15 17-feb-15 22-feb-15 27-feb-15 04-mar-15 09-mar-15 Posts ‘Game of Thrones’ related tweets over 30 days Launched 0 100000 200000 300000 400000 13-apr-05 18-apr-05 23-apr-05 28-apr-05 03-maj-05 08-maj-05
  • 12. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 12 On-demand Frequency US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: US Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly >50% of the studied US population use Netflix at least once a week 41% 27% 6% 8% 5% 4% 4% 5% 1% 3% 4% 3% 2% 2% 1% 1% 71% 52% 19% 19% 13% 12% 9% 9% 9% 8% 6% 6% 5% 3% 2% 2% YouTube Netflix Amazon Prime Hulu HBO Go/HBO Now ABC.com Apple iTunes Xfinity On- demand Crackle Vevo U-verse On- demand Twitch Vudu FiOS on demand Pirate streaming Pirate File sharing At least daily At least weekly Percent of people using each on-demand service on a daily vs. weekly basis, US 2015 [self-reported]
  • 13. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 13 Connected TV Screens 12% 11% 14% 14% 12% 17% 21% 23% Wii, Xbox, PlayStation Other Separate box for online TV/video access Google Chromecast Apple TV Percentage of consumers that have and use each device [Self-reported]: Percentage of consumers that do not have, but plan to get each device [Self-reported]: Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US 8 67% are able to watch internet content on their TV screens at home, and
 89% of these feel they can access all or most apps and services they want!
  • 14. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 14 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 TV screen Desktop screen Laptop screen Smartphone screen Tablet screen A shift from Fixed to mobile Devices BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil*, China, Germany, South Korea*, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, UK and US. * excluded. in 2010 figures, ** 3 years moving average ÂŒ, Âœ, ÂŒ Self-reported share of total weekly TV/video viewing time, per year, done on respective device ** TV screen & desktop Smartphone, tablet & laptop TV screen & desktop Smartphone, tablet & laptop Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2010-2015 Study 61% of consumers watch TV & video on their smartphones, an increase of 71% since 2012 42%think it is very important to watch their TV and Video content wherever they are
  • 15. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 15 Smartphone video viewing 78% 86% 93% UK US South Korea Proportion of smartphone users who watch video content on their smartphone, ODM measurements â€ș Majority of smartphone users watch some or the other video content on their smartphone â€ș The phenomenon is typically dominant in South Korea where smartphone is the way of life among its users Base: Android smartphone users in US, UK and South Korea Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study, [ConsumerLab Analytical Platform, On-device metering data]
  • 16. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 16 A CHANGE IN ACCESSING TV CONTENT 57% 72% 75% 74% 78% Jan 2014 Apr 2014 Jul 2014 Oct 2014 Jan 2015 Quarterly measurements of smartphone users in the US who access TV apps (such as ABC, HBO GO, CBS Mobile) at least once on their smartphones â€ș TV content is being increasingly accessed via smartphones, and its reach has grown significantly over the past year Base: US, Users accessing Entertainment TV content online via smartphones Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015 [comScore MobileMetrix Jan 2015]
  • 17. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 17 Millennials = Mobile Device viewing BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil*, China, Germany, South Korea*, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, UK and US. * excluded. in 2010 figures, ** 3 years moving average ÂŒ, Âœ, ÂŒ Self-reported share of total weekly TV/video viewing time by age group, done on respective device ** TV screen & desktop Smartphone, tablet & laptop TV screen & desktop Smartphone, tablet & laptop 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 16-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-59 TV screen Desktop screen Laptop screen Smartphone screen Tablet screen Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2010-2015 Study >60% of all TV/video viewing hours are spent on a mobile device screen among Youngsters
  • 18. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 18 millennials use the Smartphone too 375 292 200 164 71 54 404 448 368 284 141 101 48% 39% 35% 37% 33% 35% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 18-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Smartphones Tablets Share of time on Smartphone Measured average minutes per visitor and month as well as Share of Time by Age Groups – Entertainment Multimedia* *Entertainment –Multimedia category in comScore encompasses all paid and free on-demand video services Base: Users accessing Ent-Multimedia content online via smartphones and tablets â€ș Entertainment-Multimedia services are accessed more by younger consumers on mobile devices â€ș Though more time is spent on tablets across age groups, share of time on smartphone is higher for younger consumers Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study [comScore MobileMetrix Jan 2015]
  • 19. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 19 UGC Still dominate mobile viewing Mobile viewing is set to change due to the rapid growth of S-VOD Percent of consumers that watch each content type on the Smartphone [self-reported] 4% 4% 5% 6% 6% 6% 7% 8% 8% 9% 11% 33% Scheduled other TV programs Live events Scheduled TV Movies Streamed, On-demand other TV programs Scheduled TV series Live sports Recorded content Streamed, On-demand TV series Streamed, On-demand movies Live news Downloaded content Videos made by other consumers 9% 14% 16% 17% 17% 29% 29% 38% 40% 42% 49% 52% Streamed, On-demand other TV programs Video made by other consumers Streamed, On-demand TV series Streamed, On-demand movies Live events Downloaded content Live sports Recorded content Scheduled other TV programs Live news Scheduled TV-series Scheduled TV Movies Percent of consumers that watch each content type on the TV Screen [Self-reported] BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine and US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
  • 20. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 20 Smartphone and tablet on equal footing in terms of short video 202 252 273 588 Youtube Netflix Measured average minutes per visitor and month on On-Demand/Streaming Services [Smartphone Vs. Tablets] Base: Users accessing YouTube and Netflix via smartphones or tablets respectively â€ș Tablets and smartphone are equally preferred for watching shorter video content â€ș However, Tablets are preferred for watching longer format content like Netflix Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study [comScore MobileMetrix Jan 2015] Tablets Smartphones Smartphones Tablets
  • 21. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 21 Coping strategies â€ș Upgrade to unlimited data plans â€ș Look for Wi-Fi everywhere â€ș Watch offline/downloaded content Seamlessness expected Regular commuters Long- distance commuters Need a seamless internet connection International travelers During international stay Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015 [social media scanning, Twitter.com] “There better be Wi-Fi on my flight... can't cope with 13 hours without @Netflix.” #Netflix #HolidaysFollow “Literally on the longest bus ride and my 3G keeps cutting out so I can’t watch @Netflix” #Netflix #TravelingFollow
  • 22. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 22 43% 57% 33% 37% 74% 29% 33% 22% 49% 87% 73% 19% 45% 6% 8% 64% 7% 8% 5% 16% 96% 46% Weekly Viewing Situations In bed before getting up At home during the morning While commuting At workplace or school At home during the day Out and about in the city Sitting at e.g. a cafĂ© At events At friends’ or relatives’ homes At home during the evening In bed before falling asleep 16-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-59 60-69 Base: Population aged 16–69 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly in in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study Percentage of consumers that on a weekly basis watch any type of TV/video content in different situations, comparison across age groups [Self-reported]:
  • 23. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 23 16% 24% 6%21% 31% 2% At least daily Weekly Monthly Less often Never Don’t know Place- and device shifting grows 21% increase in place- and device shifting since last year 52% amongst S-VOD users place- and device shift! AT HOME COMMUTING AT WORK INTERNET CAFÉ Self-reported frequency of watching a specific TV program, show or movie on one device, interrupt or pause it and then continue watching it on another device: Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US 40% at least once per week
  • 24. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 24 71% 80% 88% 29% 20% 12% US South Korea UK Wi-Fi data consumption Cellular (Mobile) data consumption Network impact from video usage Measured proportion of Wi-Fi vs Cellular data being used for TV and Video apps amongst smartphone video viewers Base: Android users that watch video content on their smartphones Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study [ConsumerLab Analytical Platform, On-device metering data] Measured cellular (mobile) data usage ratio for TV and Video apps amongst smartphone video viewers with 3G vs 4G connections: 2,5 4 3 US South Korea UK X more data4G users 3G 4G users 3G 4G users 3G X more data X more data
  • 25. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 25 Piracy can be beaten Percent of people using each on-demand service, Spain 2011 vs 2015 Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2014-2015 Study BASE: US and Spain Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly 2%3% 14% 25%26%29% 42% 58% 92% 8% 0% 13% 30% 9% 15% 24% 30% 84% 2015 2011 Percent of people using each on-demand service, US 2011 vs 2015 96% 25%25%22%19%18%16%14%10%7%5%2% 84% 29%32% 9%4%5%2% 2015 2011
  • 26. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 26 The decision processes Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
  • 27. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 27 Today, most consumers receive constant TV and video recommendations from friends, reviews, etc. This means that the challenge is not necessarily just discovering content, but remembering what to look for at the moment of viewing. DISCOVERING AND REMEMBERING CONTENT Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015 A recommendation engine should evolve to include influences the consumer has had outside of the service The content discovery process throughout a day Social recommendations Influencers, reviews, trailers etc.
  • 28. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 28 Challenges with current Recommendation features Personal recommendation The fact that some Netflix recommendations may be so accurate, leaves the subscriber in shock and almost generates a feel of a breach in privacy Shared accounts Consumers unhappy with inappropriate recommendations, is often the result of shared accounts and profiles with family and friends Unrelated recommendations Some consumers blame the provider for bad delivery of recommendations, since they are unable themselves to understand why they receive it Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study [Social Media scanning, Twitter.com] “Netflix’s suggestion of category based on my viewing ‘Violent Supernatural Movies from 1980s’. What does that say about me?” #RecommendedFollow “No, netflix, I don’t want recommendation based on Merlin, I’m already watching that” #Privacy #NetflixFollow “I opened up my Hulu app and look at ‘”Shows you watch” tab, was confused until I remembered I share the account” #Privacy #HuluFollow
  • 29. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 29 Recommendation engines fail today â€ș Recommendation engines are not perceived as smart enough when recommended titles have already been watched, are seemingly relevant, that are too obvious or appear completely weird and un-related â€ș Personal recommendations are not perceived as personal but rather relatively general â€ș Similar recommendations keep recurring over and over again â€ș The recommendations fail to surprise and inspire â€ș Social recommendations are perceived as more useful and reliable It’s like 1 in 10 recommendations that you get on Netflix that’s actually relevant for you
 - Johan, 38 years, Sweden But also people do post like if they're into like new shows and stuff like that. They'll be like oh my God this episode is crazy. And I do trust those. I got into new genres through that.” - Melinda, 28 years, USA Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
  • 30. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 30 Consumers ‘default’ when finding content is too difficult The consumer stated frequency of difficulty in finding something to watch on their traditional broadcast TV service: 10% 7% 28% 19% 31% Less often Once per week Several times per week Once per day Several times per day Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US 50% can’t find anything to watch at least once every day IDEA OF VIEWING ACTUAL VIEWING DAY 1 ACTUAL VIEWING DAY 2
  • 31. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 31 The guided consumer in traditional broadcast TV The greatest influences for consumers in deciding what to watch on their broadcast TV service: 6% 7% 18% 29% 40% Recommendations based on what others who watched this have also watched User ratings – Look at how other users have rated movies, TV-series Recommendations from friends and family Advertisements (trailers) for TV programs Browsing through the titles in the TV-guide within the service Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Consumers’ perception of the ease of navigating in their broadcast TV service [Self-reported]: 2% 6% 26% 26% 32% I find it very difficult to navigate and find content I find it difficult to navigate and find content I find it neither easy nor difficult to navigate and find content I find it very easy to navigate and find content I find it easy to navigate and find content Only 29% of broadcast TV viewers are satisfied with the quality and level of detail in their current TV guide
  • 32. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 32 Reliance on aid for content discovery 36% 25% 23% 16% 7% 5% Netflix Users Overall TV Video Users Netflix Users Overall TV Video Users Netflix Users Overall TV Video Users IMDBFandangoMoviefone Base: 18+ Smartphone Users who visit Netflix or consume TV/Video via their Smartphones (Browser or App) Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study [comScore MobileMetrix Jan 2015] Netflix users are more likely to be dependent on content discovery sites Measured percentage of smartphone users that watch Netflix or watch TV video on their smartphones and access different content discovery sites:
  • 33. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 33 THE PRICE OF PERSONAL INFORMATION 1 in 4 TV/video consumers are open to providing personal data to get more accurate recommendations Percentage of consumers who are interested in different recommendation features for content and TV services (self-reported) Base: Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US 32% 32% 31% 22% Personalized TV service offering based on own viewing habits Personalized content recommendation based on own ratings of previously watched content Personalized content recommendation based on own viewing habits, age, gender and zip code Content recommendations that are not based on any personal information â€ș OK with out-of-service behavioral tracking â€ș Actively provide personal information â€ș OK with in-service behavioral tracking â€ș OK with providing preferences when opting into the service Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
  • 34. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 34 20% 53% 27% 29% 48% 23% I am very uncomfortable Indifferent I am very comfortable Age 35+ Millennials (age 16-34) Enough Trust to provide personal data Comfort level for consumers with regards to information tracking about behaviors and preferences , in order to receive an improved viewing experience [Self-reported]: 1 in 2 consumers trust that their current TV service provider handles their personal data securely and responsibly Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Millennials have the highest acceptance to providing personal information to improve recommendations
  • 35. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 35 7% 17% 10% 15% 40% 11% 8% 17% 9% 14% 37% 15% Cord cutting remains the same Cord-cutters over a year ago Those who once paid for managed TV but eliminated spending over 12 months ago Cord-cutters past 12 month Those who once paid for managed TV but eliminated spending last year Cord-shavers past 12 month Managed TV subscribers who have decreased spending Cord-nevers Those who have never paid for managed TV Corders – unchanged past 12 month Managed TV subscribers who have not changed spending Corders – increased past 12 month Managed TV subscribers who have increased spending Self-reported changes in household spending on managed TV services, in the past 12 months, 2014 answers compared to 2015: 20152014 Base: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2014 & 2015 Study
  • 36. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 36 11% 11% 16% 17% 33% 47% Paying for using other TV/Video internet services instead (e.g. Netflix, Amazon Prime) I'm not satisfied with how our managed TV-service works No package suits me, I can’t customize my own package Using other free TV/Video internet services instead (e.g. Hulu, YouTube) Do not watch enough TV to justify the cost Wanted or needed to save money reasons to reduce or cut Self-reported changes in household spending on managed TV, in the past 12 months: Reasons to eliminate the household managed TV package: BASE left graph: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US BASE right graph: : Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly, and have reduced or eliminated their managed TV package in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study 8% 17% 9% 14% 37% 15% Cord-cutters over a year ago Cord-cutters past 12 month Cord-shavers past 12 month Cord-nevers Corders – unchanged past 12 month Corders – increased past 12 month 2015
  • 37. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 37 â€ș An exploding number of options are available to viewers who want to ditch their traditional TV subscriptions but not forsake their television-watching habits â€ș With a broadband subscription and a streaming device, people have more freedom to pay for what they want to watch and decide how they want to watch it Cord Cutting - An easy choice Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015 [Social media scanning, Twitter.com] “Apple TV is worth every penny. Makes cord-cutting so easy!!” #AppleTVFollow “I'll ditch cable if Apple releases a TV streaming service. Might consider Sling TV, @Hulu and @Netflix too!” #Apple #SlingTv #Netflix “Decided that TV isn't important. I’m cutting the cord! Can you send me your Netflix password?” #Netflix Follow Follow
  • 38. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 38 No clear value for cord nevers Reasons for never paying a managed TV service: 6% 6% 15% 18% 21% 58% There is too much advertising on managed TV My living situation doesn’t allow me to have a managed TV service I get all the TV and video content I need from different other services (e.g. Netflix, YouTube) I feel a managed TV service is not worth the cost I can’t afford a managed TV service I have not felt the need to have a managed TV service Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US [those who have never paid for a managed TV service] REASONS TO AVOID â€ș TV providers give little value for money â€ș Save money â€ș Limited habits of viewing linear TV â€ș Linear TV can easily become a time thief in everyday life â€ș OTT services are readily available â€ș Weariness with TV advertising
  • 39. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 39 Continuing without A cord BARRIERS TO PAYING FOR MANAGED TV Percentage of cord-nevers that may or may not pay for traditional managed TV services in the future [Self-reported]: Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US [those who have never paid for a managed TV service] 50% 34% 16% â€ș OTT on demand services already cater to core needs â€ș Managed TV feels redundant â€ș Limited perceived value in increased TV and video viewing â€ș More value for money with OTT options â€ș No acceptance to having binding contracts No Don’t know Yes
  • 40. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 40 Cord nevers consume less Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
  • 41. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 41 29% 37% 15% 19% 43% 15% 12% 8% 18% 75% 56% In comparison with managed TV consumers, on a daily basis cord-nevers: â€ș Spend one hour less watching scheduled broadcast movies, series and other programs, as well as live content â€ș Spend less time viewing downloaded or streamed on-demand series, movies and other programs â€ș Watch YouTube clips almost as often The habits of Cord-nevers In bed before getting up At home during the morning While commuting At workplace or school At home during the day Out and about in the city Sitting at e.g. a cafĂ© At events At friends’ or relatives’ homes At home during the evening In bed before falling asleep Cord-cutters over a year ago Cord-shavers past 12 months Cord-cutters past 12 months Corders – unchanged past 12 months Cord-nevers Corders – increased past 12 months Base: Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
  • 42. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 42 ADDING NEW SERVICES â€ș When managed TV is not an option, consumers actively search for other services that can cater to their needs, therefore, their devices may contain numerous apps and services PROMINENT Cord-Cutter habits TABLETS RULE â€ș More convenient than laptops â€ș Larger screen than smartphones â€ș Easy to move around â€ș Fewer distractions that interrupt viewing NEW NEWS CHANNELS Facebook â€ș Get updates from their network and watch videos Twitter â€ș Follow those who post news and watch news clips YouTube â€ș Watching highlights on YouTube Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015 “I only watch @HBO Now movies. What's regular TV?” #HBO Follow “A cord-cutter’s dream: Tivo Roamio + Sling TV. Make it happen!” #TivoRoamio #SlingTV #CordCutting Follow
  • 43. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 43 Even though managed TV is up for negotiation in many households, there are a number of arguments to keep it. Rationales for keeping the cord Old habits die hard An easy option for relaxation Best for background viewing Spoilers in social media Still a household campfire Socially rewarding experience Live content Premiere viewing Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015 © Ericsson AB 2015 | TV and media 2015 | 2015-07-20 | Page 43
  • 44. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 44 28% 35% 40%41%42% 45% 48%48% 55% 19% 29% 26% 39% 45% 36% 45% 41% 52% Interactive TVDubbed AudioMy TV-/Video content anywhere 4K/UHD qualityÀ la carte TV-/video package Theatrical releasesFree from ads/commercials Time shift/On demand HD quality 2015 2011 importance of TV Media features- TRENDS Percentage of consumers that say each TV Media feature is important (Showing top 2 answers on 7-graded scale): Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US [Interest, top 2 answers on 7-graded scale]
  • 45. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 45 34% 27% 31% 27% 25% 30% 8% 10% 7% 34% 30% 26% 25% 23% 23% 20% 13% 11% HD quality Free from ads/commercials 4K / UHDTV quality On demand/Time shift À la carte TV-/video package Theatrical releases My TV-/Video content anywhere Dubbed audio Interactive TV 2011 2015 TV Media features worth paying for – Trends Percentage of consumers that say each TV Media feature is worth paying extra for: Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2011 & 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, China, Germany, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, UK, US
  • 46. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 46 In search of a new Experience 11% 22% 56% No, I prefer to get them from different providers Yes, even if it costs as much as the sum of the individual services Yes, but only if it helps me to save money Percentage of consumers preferring to receive their TV-service, internet and mobile service from the same provider [Self-reported]: BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Great overall experience Great content Great flexibility 5% 5% 12% 78% Yes I have, because I wanted to wait for a while until they offered new and interesting content again Yes I have, because I had already seen most of the titles offered by the service Yes I have, because I wanted to decrease my TV and entertainment costs No I haven’t done this Percentage of consumers pausing or making any changes to their OTT subscription for a period of time [Self-reported]: Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
  • 47. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 47 Expectations on Advertising â€ș Possible to skip ads â€ș Ad blockers available â€ș Fewer breaks and often only at the beginning EASIER TO COPE WITH ONLINE ADS â€ș Ads ruin the otherwise high quality experience of watching priority content on the big TV â€ș Focused viewing on scheduled linear TV is too interrupted by ads HIGHER DEMANDS ON THE TV EXPERIENCE â€ș Online ads have a tendency to be slightly more relevant/personal â€ș Online ads are slightly more varied and thus bearable ONLINE ADS ARE MORE RELEVANT Percentage of consumers engaged in other activities in order to avoid watching ads [Self-reported]: Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US
  • 48. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 48 Preferred types of advertising YouTube has advertisements but you can skip them in three to five seconds which is pretty convenient. And I think because I've just been such an Internet person from early childhood, I'm pretty good at tuning out advertisements in general.” - Melinda, 28 years, USA BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study 43% of consumers prefer to watch personalized ads based on viewing habits and demographics
  • 49. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 49 The TV/Media budget Self-reported household monthly spending on TV and video related services 48% 9% 3% 6% 9% 25% ~$140/ month Managed TV (e.g. cable TV) S-VOD services T-VOD services Buying or renting physical media (e.g. DVDs) Cinema/movie theater visits Fixed internet subscription Base: US Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media studies 2011–2015 For consumers that are not yet OTT users, the notion of a TV/video budget seems irrelevant, yet heavy OTT users feel that they have to keep track of all the services they pay for and the total cost. TV PROVIDER ONLY Budget is irrelevant TV PROVIDER + 1 OTT Budget is not a main concern MULTIPLE OTT SERVICES Budget is important © Ericsson AB 2015 | TV and media 2015 | 2015-07-20 | Page 49
  • 50. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 50 Self-reported estimated monthly spending evolution – US Monthly Media Spending Evolution Base: US Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media studies 2011–2015 Self-reported estimated monthly spending breakdown – US (excluding fixed internet subscriptions) 63% 12% 5% 12% 7% 66% 9% 4% 14% 7% 2014 2015 ~$103 ~$105 Managed TV (e.g. cable TV) S-VOD devices T-VOD services Cinema/movie theater visits Physical media e.g. DVDs) Physical media (e.g. DVD) Cinema/movie theater T-VOD services S-VOD services Managed TV TOTAL 2011/12 2014/15 86 USD 104 USD Increase No change Increase Increase No change
  • 51. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 51 TV/Video Service Satisfaction 48% 35% 28% 25% 27% 48% 44% 46% 49% 38%Recommendation Get useful recommendations Price The price compared to what I get Mobility Ability to watch on any device anywhere Available content Amount and type of content Video quality Picture and sound Base: US Population aged 16–59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/video at least weekly Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media studies 2015 On-demand TV/video services Traditional linear TV services Satisfaction with quality, content, mobility, price and recommendations among those who use it, anonymized distribution for the US:
  • 52. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 52 Traditional TV Services vs on-demand services BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study
  • 53. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 53 TV has become a combination of linear, on demand capabilities and catch-up services, which is consequential for managed TV users. THE WORLD OF ENTERTAINMENT Linear channels T-VOD Online catch-up DVR TRADITIONAL USER EXPERIENCE USER EXPERIENCE RATIONALE TODAY World of entertainmentLinear channels T-VOD Online catch-up DVR S-VOD Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV and media 2015
  • 54. TV Media 2015 Consumer Insights External Presentation | © Ericsson AB 2015 | 2015-12-16 | Page 54 Embracing the seamless experience TV/video consumers are growing increasingly weary of tech, devices, boxes, remote controls and cables. There’s little added value in having TV/video technology on display. Everything should be compatible with everything As little ‘intermediary’ technology as possible The ‘parts’ of the technology and hardware setup should preferably not be visible Percentage of consumers interested in a TV/video service that combines live TV with On-demand services on every screen in an integrated experience including getting everything on one monthly bill: Source: Ericsson ConsumerLab TV & Media 2015 Study BASE: Population aged 16-59 with broadband at home who watch any type of TV/Video at least weekly in Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Mexico, Portugal, Russia, Spain, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, UK, Ukraine, US