Bruce the Great: Woof!

Bruce WeberCourtesy of Moncler An image from Moncler’s new advertising campaign, photographed by Bruce Weber.

Moncler’s new advertising campaign, photographed by Bruce Weber, with a self portrait among the images that will appear in magazines this fall, reminds us that advertising can often be more directional than editorial. Think of the influence that Weber himself has had with Ralph Lauren and Calvin Klein, or that Juergen Teller has had with his Marc Jacobs campaigns. We’ve come to expect that ice floe to be broken by photographers allowed to be completely free.

“I think things are changing everywhere and communication has to change as well,” Luca Stoppini, the art director of Italian Vogue, told me this morning in a telephone conversation. Stoppini also works with Remo Ruffini, the president and majority owner of Moncler, to create the brand’s ads. Moncler, which was founded in 1952, in Grenoble, France, is a pretty hip label but not really a fashion label, as Mr. Stoppini points out. In a sense, it has the flexibility to embrace its roots as well as be humorous. Mr. Ruffini, who bought Moncler in 2003, has added Gamme Rouge, a special line designed by Giambattista Valli that is a more audacious take on puffers, and Gamme Bleu for men by Thom Browne.

INSERT DESCRIPTIONCourtesy of Moncler Bruce Weber’s self portrait.

At the outset, Mr. Stoppini wanted to include Mr. Weber in the campaign, and not simply have him behind the camera. Mr. Weber, naturally, was skeptical about being a subject. “I said, ‘No way!’ ” he recalled with his bearish laugh. But then Mr. Stoppini proposed a donation by Moncler to one of Mr. Weber’s favorite charities, and the photographer agreed to do a self-portrait. (According to Mr. Stoppini, Moncler will donate 100,000 euros, or about $140,000, to Green Chimneys, which provides animal-assisted therapy to young people.)

The shoot was done at Golden Beach, Florida, where Mr. Weber and his partner Nan Bush have a home. As charming as the self-portrait is, with Mr. Weber appearing to snooze amid the tools of his trade, I liked how he incorporated his sense of play into the images. He had Moncler down jackets made for his golden retrievers, and he had a giant ball made from a bunch of coats, which some guys are seen pushing up a gravel pile. At the same time, the absence of an overt fashion message is interesting, and, of course, effective.

“I kind of never want to take it all that seriously,” said Mr. Weber of the perennial question of whether fashion photography is art or commerce. As initially reluctant as Mr. Weber was to be a subject, he is certainly an iconic figure in the history of picture taking. And there is a fairly recent tradition of featuring prominent figures—and sometimes unexpected figures—into fashion campaigns, like the Gap ads and the Louis Vuitton ads with Mikhail Gorbachev. How one advances this idea intrigues Mr. Stoppini. As he said, “It’s not so much a question of seeing things in a positive way. It’s about seeing them real.”

INSERT DESCRIPTIONCourtest of Moncler Another image from Moncler’s new advertising campaign,

Maybe in more subtle ways, Mr. Weber’s pictures also suggest the world as an open-ended experience. Possibility, possibility, possibility. He said that the Moncler folks asked to observe the shoot, and he said no. Mr. Stoppini certainly supported his position. “A photographer cannot work like that,” Mr. Stoppini said, pointing out how the quickness of digital photography—seeing the image seconds after it has been taken—has allowed some clients more influence or say in the creative process than perhaps they merit. “You lose the mysterious of everything, and the photographer also needs to think,” said Mr. Stoppini of that kind of second-guessing.

But Mr. Weber didn’t have that problem. He was completely on his own, free to play. “In a way the experience was a lot like it was in the old days when an art director or the client just trusted you to do what you thought was good,” he said.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

“The quickness of digital photography—seeing the image seconds after it has been taken—has allowed some clients more influence or say in the creative process than perhaps they merit.”

Oh boy, how true that is!!! As I said before, I’ve worked on shoots in both ages pre and post-digital, and I couldn’t agree more. In the days before digital, it was like you loaded up a carriage with a great , trusted creative team, and once we were all there, you set that carriage off on its rails and off we all went on that wild rollercoaster ride. We were just left to do our jobs. Now, nobody trusts anybody, you have to get the shot in five minutes or else, and everybody has an opinion. Too many chefs, definitely. It’s a shame, because theoretically, digital photography could actually ENHANCE the creative process, where you can instantly see where things are heading and then dramatically change tack or develop that original thinking, but that’s rarely the case. And I always thought digital was gonna be the big budget saviour, ( that’s how it was touted at its introduction) where one wouldn’t have to re-shoot anything as the results where already there, among other advantages….but it’s funny that everyone still re-shoots like mad and budgets have only inflated, (though I guess they’d be dramatically slashed these days.) Bring back the age of illustration, I say, where all the control was ultimately in ONE person’s hands! Well, theoretically, anyway…I’ve seen many people who really shouldn’t, stick their noses in there and pitch in their two cent’s worth, too.)

I’d rather look at those gorgeous dogs in an ad than some silly, tired, overexposed ‘celebrity’ anyday. All hail the new supermodels.

such great images. they are not just some cosmetic ‘stylish’ pictures. you can see the ideas of the photographer clearly and easily. probably only bruce and fabian are capable of.

the great collapse of the wall street exposed the lies, the greed, and the recklessness that drove much of the growth of the economy at the turn of the century. that has a tremendous impact on advertising. in short, people just don’t trust what they see on tv anymore. it is highly ineffective to try selling products with an ad nowadays. the smart ones moved online to generate word-of-mouth campaign – american apparel, gauliter’s madame, etc. – by going directly to bloggers and twitters.

moncler chose to make something new out of the old. reaching back to the emotional connection with the customers, the products are depicted as secondary, nothing more than just a tool or everyday items. they visuals are humorous, upbeat, and reasons to get up in the morning. instead of cutting the advertising budget, moncler decided that now is the best time to really build its branding.

interesting last image. are they 5 sisyphus condemned to spend all of eternity pushing that giant ball of coats up the hill only to have it roll back down just before it reached the top of the hill? if so, does bruce want us to have faith for fashion to get though the great recession?

Well, all I can say is that those Moncler-clad labs are just priceless. From the devil-may-care pooch on the lower right, to the blissed out pup on the left – what a wonderful example of Weber’s unique sense of humor.

E. Frantz, I am with you. How about an entire edition of Vogue shot by Weber, using his Labs, and William Wegman and his Weimaraners? Just imagine it: Wegman’s sleek models would look fabulous in Dior’s current resort collection (which, by the way, is so evocative and suave.). And the Labs would be ideal for some classic Ralph Lauren. None of them would bring their rock bad-boy toys to the shoot to get in the way and be a distraction; they don’t need endless cigarette breaks, they don’t demand a team of high-priced stylists, and I hear they work for kibble – so good for the budget during these rough times in the magazine world.

Beware Moncler! It used to be a great, small brand; I lived in Grenoble in the early 1980s, and you wore Moncler to ski or hike or ride your moped to the market in the snow. It was high quality, practical and very good value (quite affordable, actually). Exactly the opposite of what this “hip” label is today.

Absolutely adorable! Love the dogs

“We’ve come to expect that ice floe to be broken by photographers allowed to be completely free.”

With the greatest of respect to Mr Weber – by ‘free’, are we to infer ‘derivative’?
//www.umbro.com/en/gallery/dogs/

Dear Moderator, please ignore my previous comment and post this one cause I made a ridiculous mistake writing WORN instead of WORE. Thanks!

Great post Cathy, a truly welcome fresh air amidst gossip, fashion is the devil and economic downfall.
Here we have fashion in its fullest (Weber, Moncler, Valli, Browne, Italian Vogue) but dialoguing with creativity, ideas, sense of humor, free spirit.
Bruce Weber is an eternal dynamo and Moncler has given us some very decent/funny/interesting skiwear variations.
I bought a pair of black trousers of the brand some months ago (chez Colette) and I already wore them 3 times including as a tuxedo element.
The price is good, the quality is more than good and the effect is playful and attractive.
Weber and Moncler seem to be THE couple of the season and that´s good news.

It’s nice to see Bruce Weber do something less slick than what we are used to seeing from his work for Ralph Lauren and Abercrombie & Fitch. These images are so much more interesting and evocative. They remind me of some of the ads Helmut Lang used to do which really showed no product at all. Ultimately, they probably didn’t do much for his business, but creatively, they were arresting, much like these shots. It think the giant ball of down jackets could become iconic, and Moncler is enough of a cult brand that it can benefit from some indulgent advertising. Weber succeded in making down jackets interesting, which is a massive accomplishment.

Have you guys gotten to see this month’s W yet? If you haven’t seen it yet, give it a look. (Ignore Bruce Will and wife at all costs! LOL) There’s a feature on up and comering designers that’s fantastic. There’s some good talent coming thru the pipeline, so check it out.

I thought you all might appreciate this after the CFDA’s super predictable love fest.

And why has no one mentioned the obvious?

That fashion has gone to the dogs?

This is a fantastic shot. And what a great sense of humor. You’ve got to work fast when you’re shooting animals and that’s more than half the answer….it’s in the spontaneity that the good shot happens. The photographer just has to be ready to capture it with good lighting and good environment.

I see Weber shows himself up to the task.

Love the dogs. Last summer I returned home from a month’s trip to discover that my dog-sitter had groomed my golder retriever daily with my Mason Pearson brush. These photos are the next, inevitable step. (Queenie looked gorgeous, by the way.)

As the breeder of several of Bruce’Weber’s dogs the are NOT LABS but gorgeous golden retrievers. Labs have short hair and are called Yellow Labs, Chocolate Labs, and Black Labs. Bruce’s are called Golden Retrievers.

Visione: I do remember a huge, gorgeous editorial portfolio of some Weber labs in an issue of IT vogue sometime back in the ’90s…no surprise I guess, considering all the multi-page portfolios he’s done before (I’ll try to dig it out to give you the issue date.)

Yes, very true ( and funny!) about dogs and photoshoots… No outrageous demands, irritating entourages or problem boyfriends. Just get a set of chewtoys ( to keep them from destroying the Manolos) and you’re done. In fact, that tactic might work for a few of the current day celebs too, come to think of it. Though I must admit that I have also witnessed quite a bit of diva-ish behaviour of the canine variety on set at times. (You’re a pussy in the styling business until you’ve styled your first doggy costume catalog.) But, like all great supermodels, they will always give you the shot at the end. Ah well…they’ve always said modelling is a dog’s life.

Enjoyed the article about Bruce Weber but have noticed an issue that needs fixing. Bruces dogs are all AKC golden retrievers except for the black rescue dog. I know this as fact, because My dog, Higgins is sire of TRUE, and is grandsire of a few of the others that are pictured. Labs, as they were called in the article are a different breed. They come in three colors, black yellow and chocolate. Golden retrievers coats are long where labs coats are short. Goldens come in various shades of gold, ranging from light to deep golden color. They are NEVER black, or chocolate. Please help to set the record straight so that people who read this article don’t think that labs and goldens are the same breed.

Thanks,

Barb Tompsett
Glenwood Golden Retrievers

This is a comment about an ad on your blog page. It looks like a site that is selling Christian Louboutin shoes, but after perusing the web site, I think they are selling fakes! That doesn’t seem like something you would approve of, or the Times would approve of. I was wondering if you knew about it and what you think about it. Thank you!

Finally ,models with smiles and a healthy BMI !
LeeAnn

so nice to laugh about fashion and adv
let find more humor in our life

It’s a much different direction I thought Moncler would go, opting for something much more down to earth than the flashy European ski bunny that I had taken it for. It seems they’re trying to reposition themselves as something with more substance than just a status giving expensive puffer jacket brand. Probably a good move right now.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m loving what Browne and Valli are doing with their collaborations, but what is Moncler’s heritage? Anyone familiar with the brand’s history? I thought LV was ingenious with their Gorbachev ad and now their astronaut campaign, really gives the brand some depth and connects to their origins as trunk packers and makers- the idea of travel and moving things forward. I’m not at all sure what the dogs, Bruce, and a sisyphysian ball of jackets is supposed to get at.

Oh lord – enough with the dogs as surrogate children already. They are animals folks. Care for them, keep them healthy and WALK THEM. So sick of seeing overweight dogs and their overweight owners.

Mea culpa, Golden retriever fans! Yes, these are NOT labs, but the uber-warm and friendly retrievers. My bad!

(But what can you expect from a cat person? Or, to be more accurate, what can you expect from the servant of a cat, for all cat “owners” ultimately must come to realize that to our cats, we are, quite simply, “staff”? On that note, it would be difficult to imagine even Mr. Weber able to cram Moncler coats on seven cats, let alone get them all to pose for a photo such as this! Not without a LOT of bandaids, neosporin ointment and a bottle of brandy for solace when the cats have disappeared leaving only shredded Moncler-fragments behind.)

And thanks, E. frantz – I would love to have that IT Vogue issue number.

A note on Mr. Weber’s choice of charity, Green Chimneys. This is a superb organization which I have supported for years. Seeing traumatized young kids literally healed and made whole through their daily interactions with and caring for animals is absolutely amazing. Kudos to Weber for helping by directing such a generous donation their way.

Nueve Musas,

Heritage X Evolution, that´s the most difficult equation to solve.
IMO, Moncler is doing fine tho I get your point.

these dogs are fat!

javielo,

It’s just the fit of the clothing….it doesn’t bring out the best of their figures…..

and visione, it’s so true about the cats…..royalty wouldn’t be caught dead doing such plebian animal acts.

Still, it’s a thought.

The whole shot has been digitally created though, right? I think they’ve shot one or two dogs at a time in the same environment and then cut and pasted them together. The black dog with the tongue larger than his head was my first clue (though it’s cute), then how some of the placement between the dogs are….they are just layered in.

But he got the individual shots which is just as difficult. I’ve got some good shots of a dog in clothes I did with my 4 year old daughter. What a blast to do, and I won an award with it; you could never do this many dogs in one shot, not possible, and have it look so good.

Back in Art College, one of the most talented students was consistently badgered into diversifying his style & every time a project was completed, based on the instructors infectious belligerence, 90% of his peers would berate the similarity between this design & his prior submission. Art students are traditionally introverts; the mimicry of parrots soon won over, his wings were clipped & he dropped out. There was sadness among his contemporaries, not for the sake of his talent being unappreciated but, their search for a new target would be time consuming.

Rembrandt & Vermeer exhibited distinctive styles; Gaudi & Gehry architecture’s instantly recognizable; Capra & Vidor films are easily separated as the cream o’ the crop however, this modern obsession with exhibiting something completely foreign every time out, to satiate the public appetite for not knowing what they want in the first place, is nauseating. Oh look, Steven Meisel photographed an ‘Oh Henry’ wrapper! Very avant garde! Wow, Mario Testino photographed a boulder in the Adirondacks! What was his inspiration? Exclamation point everything! Who cares … triple exclamation points. The trouble without modern anything is a distinct lack of cohesion; an artists signature changes based on what’s current & even then, it rarely blossoms into anything interesting. Very few people alive today will be remembered 100 years into the future for producing anything memorable.

no, they’re not. it’s just the “down coat effect”.