1)可以使用自己的授權書 1. 業主有權: 只授權他人代表出席業主會議 (以便達到開會法定人數); 及 2. 業主有權: 授權他人代投票。 判例: LDBM 301/2012 1. This case concerns the validity of a meeting of the owners of Headland Village in Discovery Bay City held on 2 August 2012. . . . 42. Applying these principles to this case, the owners and City Management have agreed to be bound by the Sub-DMC. In the case of corporate owners, clause 6(b) of the Sub-DMC merely requires them to appoint their representative by a written instrument addressed to the manager. There is no requirement that the authorisation must also bear the company chop of the corporate owner. Both counsel agree that the Guidelines and the Proxy Form are not binding on the owners. . . . 根據以上案例,你可以不使用標準的 (BMO) 委任代表的文書(授權書)。 [樣式]只授權出席開會的授權書 (公民黨- 容詠嫦 ) 2) (文書)字眼用字不同不影響合法性 判例: LDBM 265/2012 28. 盧先生指出所用文書與表格2不同之處,只是字眼上的差異,並不影響實質內容。《釋義及通則條例》第37(1)條訂明:「如任何表格與由或根據條例所訂的有所差異, 只要不影響表格的內容實質,即不得因此而無效。 」 29. 再者,民政事務總署在《2007年建築物管理(修訂)條例常見問題》第156條問答有以下建議: 「問: 管委會可否