New Jersey Plans Doubling of Solar Power

Mark Lovretin/PSE&G A worker adjusts a solar panel at PSE&G Solar’s training center in Edison, N.J.

PSE&G Solar, a subsidiary of the big New Jersey utility, said on Wednesday that received the regulatory go-ahead to add 80 megawatts of solar capacity in its territory by the end of 2013, effectively doubling the amount of solar power in the state. That will maintain New Jersey’s position as the nation’s second-ranked state for solar photovoltaic installations, behind only California.

The installation, scaled down slightly from the original plan, will cost $515 million, and will add $1.20 to $4 a year to the average residential customer’s electricity bill, a spokesman, Paul L. Rosengren, said. He did not say what the electricity would cost per kilowatt-hour but acknowledged, “solar is above-market.” The large scale of the project is intended to hold down costs, he said.

The installation is a little less than one-twentieth of the amount of solar power that New Jersey is required to have in place by 2020.

Of the 80 megawatts, half will be filled by 200,000 small panels mounted atop utility poles. Each will provide 200 watts; six of those would be needed to power a hair dryer. These panels will look like the ones used to power emergency telephones by the sides of interstate highways. The 200,000 will be the world’s largest installation of pole-mounted solar units, according to the manufacturer, Petra Solar, which is based in New Jersey and will add 100 employees to the 40 working there now.

The other half of the 80 megawatts will be in big installations, spread between sites owned by PSE&G, sites owned by third parties, and New Jersey Urban Enterprise Zones, areas where the state is trying to encourage business activity.

Although the panels may produce 80 megawatts with the sun directly overhead, their contribution to meeting peak electric demand in New Jersey will probably be smaller, because the the highest electricity demand comes after the sunniest part of the day. Also, many of the panels may be shaded by buildings or trees for part of the day. Mr. Rosengren said that the panels’ value at the time of peak electricity demand could be closer to 24 megawatts.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

Perhaps it is just me, but this seems an amazingly inefficient use of state funds, especially from a state that is loaded with unused farm land. Why spend all of the money, labor and time to mount all of these small, semi-successful solar panels than just spend half of a billion dollars on one CSP facility or a single, unified PV array?

I am confused.

Why not just spend the money to build a plant in AZ, CA, or TX? Seems like it would be a more efficient use of funds. How much are these panels going to produce in a NJ winter?

In the heart of winter, December, NJ gets 5 to 6 hours of sunlight a day. See this solar map from the NREL.

//www.nrel.gov/gis/images/map_pv_us_december_dec2008.jpg

This is more than Germany or Toronto, Canada, where they are also building huge solar farms. The reason? It’s plenty of sun. As for snow, 1) Solar PV is more efficient when it’s cold. 2) Yes, there will be some snow maintenance, but very low maintenance. Hope that helps.

Thanks, and if you’re a resident, you might be interested in new incentives just passed. Contact your local installer, or you can also find one through this site.
//www.solarpowerrocks.com and others.

This is pork for the companies involved!! NJ seems to still be the corruption state.

A panel per pole is a bad, high labor, high cost with little benefit solution.

Far better would be a $1-2/wt rebate for many more homeowners who save more money as they pay 2x’s as much for electricity so payback is much faster, far more practical.

Fred is right, solar panels work better in cooler weather than in the summer. More importantly, manufacturers take into account almost two weeks worth of snow load into the estimates of how many kilowatt hours per year. So, the estimate is already baked in.

Forget the farmland – PV arrays have much less maintanence when placed on a building. NJ also has tons of unused warehouses that would be perfect except for the laws preventing them from installing solar. Save the farmland for food.

Its more efficent to have energy closer to the end user than it is to have one gigantic plant that you have to run miles of heavy cable from. Plus, the long term idea is to diminish the size and scope of the utility.

“Each will provide 200 watts; six of those would be needed to power a hair dryer. ” A misleading statement, unless you are implying the average NJ resident runs their hair dryer all daylight hours.

I am wondering how these pole mounted systems will be designed. Will each panel have a small inverter, or will the panels be wired together with one larger inverter for a string of panels. This would require long wire runs and efficiency losses. Either of these designs seem horribly inefficiency. If any knows about the design, please let me know

These 80 MW cost $515 million- that is $6.43 per watt! That would be a decent price for a small (5kw) residential system, but for 80 WM, $6.43 per watt is ridiculous.

I am all for PV, but New Jersey rate payers are being taken advantage of here.

I would love to learn how to work and understand solar power technology. Can anyone point me in the right direction as far as good acredited training schools.

I’m trying to find out where I can get training for renewable energy. I need to know what school do this kind training in NJ.

Mar_nj_23@yahoo.com

My friend just had Solar Panels put on her roof! I went to her house today and I was really warm! I was expecting it to be 3 degrees since outside it’s twenty! It is so cool that it really works! She told me she got it done //www.arosaenergy.com/ and they had alot of Incentives and Rebates! //www.arosaenergy.com/incentives-rebates.html
She is planning on heating her pool this summer with Solar Energy! I really wonder if that will work! So far I am impressed!