FULL LETTER:
Dear Members of the Worcester School Committee:
We are parents, educators, health care providers, youth workers, and residents of Worcester. We write to request that you, as our representatives on the Worcester School Committee, stand with us and vote “NO” on the proposal to implement the abstinence-based Michigan Model sex education curriculum in Worcester Public Schools.
We take no issue with Michigan Model’s broader health curriculum that has been proven to prevent substance use and help your young people care for their mental health. However, Michigan Model’s abstinence-based sex education curriculum is dangerously inadequate. The proposed program does not include lessons about how to prevent pregnancy. The program ignores the health needs of LGBTQ youth, denying them the information they need to make healthy decisions. And at a time when our country is grappling with a pervasive culture of sexual violence, the Michigan Model would perpetuate harmful stereotypes about sexual assault, placing responsibility on a victim to prevent their own assault. Schools can be valuable partners to parents when it comes to sex education, but the shaming tactics used in abstinence-based programs like the Michigan Model can stigmatize conversations about sex, making young people less likely to talk to a trusted adult when they need help.
The School Committee cannot implement an abstinence-based curriculum at a time when Worcester urgently needs an evidence-based and comprehensive sex education curriculum. Our city has one of the highest teen birth rates in the state with 13.2 births per 1,000 teen girls. Worcester also experiences significantly higher rate of sexually transmitted infections than the state has a whole, and young people are disproportionately affected. We cannot turn away from these alarming trends. We cannot settle for the Michigan Model’s sex education program, which has not been proven effective in helping teens delay sex or reducing STI rates and unintended pregnancy among teens. We must provide our young people information and resources proven to make a difference in young people’s lives.
We can empower our young people by implementing a sex education curriculum that is evidence-based, inclusive to LGBTQ youth, and comprehensive. A comprehensive curriculum is one that includes lessons about consent and healthy communication, unintended pregnancy and STI prevention, and the benefits of delaying sex. This approach improves the health of young people and helps them make healthy decisions. Such programs are proven to delay the initiation of sex, reduce the frequency of sex, and prevent sexually transmitted infections among young people.
Efforts to supplement this abstinence-based curriculum are not enough. The health of Worcester’s young people is not something that we should address through piecemeal efforts, when we know what works. While training teachers and administrators is important, LGBTQ youth deserve to see themselves reflected in the actual curriculum and their classroom experiences should not hinge on how well trained their individual teacher is to amend the lessons in real time. This incomplete and inadequate approach will not help our young people delay sex or stay healthy.
Our public schools have a responsibility to educate, support, and empower all Worcester youth. The Michigan Model’s sex education program falls short on all fronts. We ask that you vote to oppose the implementation of the Michigan Model until its inadequate sex education curriculum is replaced with an evidence-based, comprehensive sex education curriculum.
Sincerely,
[YOUR NAME]
To view a copy of the fully formatted letter, visit:
http://bit.ly/michiganmodelworcester