EMERALD - STANDARD DATA FORM
For proposed Emerald Sites (Areas of Special Conservation Interest, ASCI),
Candidate Emerald Sites and,
For Areas of Special Conservation Interest (ASCI = Emerald Sites)
SITE | BY0000125 |
---|
SITENAME | Gusak |
---|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SITE IDENTIFICATION
Back to top1.1 Type
1.2 Site code
1.3 Site name
1.4 First Compilation date
1.5 Update date
1.6 Respondent:
Name/Organisation: | Andrey Abramchuk, the Brest Oblast Unit, APB-Birdlife Belarus |
Address: |
|
Email: | egreta113@mail.ru |
1.7 Site indication and designation / classification dates
Classification | Data |
---|
Date site proposed as ASCI (Emerald): |
No data
|
Date site accepted as candidate ASCI (Emerald): |
No data
|
Date site designated as ASCI (Emerald): |
No data
|
Date site accepted as ASCI (Emerald): | 2016-11 |
National legal reference of ASCI designation: |
No data
|
2. SITE LOCATION
Back to top2.1 Site-centre location [decimal degrees]:
Longitude | 24.090600 |
Latitude | 51.874400 |
2.2 Area [ha]
2.3 Marine area [%]
2.4 Sitelength [km]:
2.5 Administrative region code and name
NUTS level 2 code
|
Region Name
|
---|
BY00 | BRESTSKAYA VOBLASTS |
2.6 Biogeographical Region(s)
3. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATION
Back to top3.1 Habitat types present on the site and site evaluation for them:
Resolution 4 Habitat type
|
Site assessment
|
---|
Code
|
PF
|
NP
|
Cover [ha]
|
Cave [number]
|
Data quality
|
A|B|C|D
|
A|B|C
|
---|
| | | | | | Representativity | Relative Surface | Conservation | Global |
---|
D2.3
|
|
| 50
| 0.00
| M
| B
| C
| B
| C
|
G1.A1
|
|
| 50
| 0.00
| M
| B
| C
| C
| C
|
G1.B3
|
|
| 300
| 0.00
| M
| B
| C
| B
| C
|
G3.1F
|
|
| 50
| 0.00
| M
| B
| C
| C
| A
|
G3.E
|
|
| 500
| 0.00
| M
| B
| C
| C
| B
|
- PF: for the habitat types that can have a non-priority as well as a priority form (6210, 7130, 9430) enter "X" in the column PF to indicate the priority form.
- NP: in case that a habitat type no longer exists in the site enter: x (optional)
- Cover: decimal values can be entered
- Caves: included in habitat types A1.44, A3, A4 and H1: enter the number of caves if estimated surface is not available.
- Data quality: G = “Good” (e.g. based on surveys); M = “Moderate” (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = Poor (e.g. rough estimation)
3.2 Species listed in Resolution 6 and site evaluation for them
- Group: A =Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, I = Invertebrates, M = Mammals, P =Plants, R = Reptiles
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Type: p=permanent, r=reproducing, c=concentration, w=wintering (for plant and non-migratory species use permanent)
- Unit: i=Individuals, p=pairs or other units according to the standardised list of population units and codes, in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting under the Birds and Habitats Directives
- Abundance categories (Cat.): C=common, R= rare, V=very rare, P=present – to fill if data quality are deficient (DD) or in addition to population size information
- Data quality: G = ‘Good’ (e.g. based on surveys); M = ‘Moderate’ (e.g. based on partial data with some extrapolation); P = ‘Poor’ (e.g. rough estimation); DD = Data deficient (use this category only, if not even a rough estimation of the population size can be made, in this case the fields for population size can remain empty, but the field "Abundance categories" has to be filled in)
3.3 Other important species of flora and fauna
Species | Population in the site | Motivation |
---|
Group
|
CODE
|
Scientific Name
|
S
|
NP
|
Size
|
Unit
|
Cat.
|
Species appendix
|
Other categories
|
---|
| | | | | Min | Max | | C|R|V|P | I | II | III | A | B | C | D |
---|
- Group: A =Amphibians, B = Birds, F = Fish, Fu = Fungi, I = Invertebrates, L = Lichens, M = Mammals, P =Plants, R = Reptiles
- CODE: for Appendix I, II and III species the code provided in the Emerald reference portal should be used, in addition to the scientific name
- S: in case that the data on species are sensitive and therefore have to be blocked for any public access enter: yes
- NP: in case that a species is no longer present in the site enter: x (optional)
- Unit: i = Individuals, p=pairs or other units according to the standardised list of population units and codes, in accordance with Article 12 and 17 reporting under the Birds and Habitats Directives.
- Cat.: Abundance categories: C=common, R= rare, V=very rare, P=present
- Motivation categories: I, II, III: Appendix Species (Bern Convention), A: National Red List data; B: Endemics; C: International Conventions; D: other reasons
4. SITE DESCRIPTION
Back to top4.1 General site character
Habitat class
|
% Cover
|
---|
N19 | 30.00 |
N17 | 40.00 |
N20 | 30.00 |
Total Habitat Cover | 100 |
---|
Other Site Characteristics
The territory is large woodland in the basin of the river Rita. Over 90% of the reserve territory is covered with forests. Coniferous forests including bog pine forests prevail. Waterlogged alder forests, islets of spruce forests, broad-leaved forests are also widespread in the territory. The Rita River as well as a number of small forest brooks and the Gusatskiy canal flow across the territory of the woodland. To the north of the eastern part of the site, near the village of Gusak there is the fish farm “Ruda”. There are the sites of open lowland bogs among the woodland. |
4.2 Quality and importance
There have been identified 204 species of vertebrate animals in the territory of the reserve, 32 of them are protected. Birds is the most numerous class – there are 148 species. Avifauna is the richest and most diverse among the vertebrate animals of the reserve. About 120 species of birds as well as 12 protected species nest or possibly nest in the territory of the reserve. There are such species of birds as Haliaeetus albicilla, Dendrocopos medius, Dendrocopos leucotos, Dendrocopos medius and other. The number of such species as Grus grus, Ciconia nigra, Bubo bubo is 1% or more of the national population. |
4.3 Threats, pressures and activities with impacts on the site
The most important impacts and activities with high effect on the site
Negative Impacts |
---|
Rank | Threats and pressures [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
M | | | b |
M | | | i |
M | | | o |
L | | | i |
M | | | o |
M | | | b |
L | | | i |
M | | | i |
M | | | i |
L | | | b |
H | | | b |
L | | | i |
Positive Impacts |
---|
Rank | Activities, management [code] | Pollution (optional) [code] | inside/outside [i|o|b] |
---|
L | | | i |
M | | | i |
M | | | o |
L | | | i |
M | | | i |
Rank: H = high, M = medium, L = low
Pollution: N = Nitrogen input, P = Phosphor/Phosphate input, A = Acid input/acidification,
T = toxic inorganic chemicals, O = toxic organic chemicals, X = Mixed pollutions
i = inside, o = outside, b = both
4.4 Ownership
Type | [%] |
---|
Public | National/Federal | 100 |
State/Province | 0 |
Local/Municipal | 0 |
Any Public | 0 |
Joint or Co-Ownership | 0 |
Private | 0 |
Unknown | 0 |
sum | 100 |
4.5 Documentation
Абрамчук А.В. Видовое разнообразие заказника “Гусак” в Малоритском районе. // Проблемы сохранения биологического разнообразия и использования биологических ресурсов: Материалы Международной научно–практическая конференции. Часть 1. Сб. науч. Работ / Под общей ред. М.Е. Никифорова – Минск, ООО «Мэджик», ИП Вараксин, 2009. С. – 7-10. |
5. SITE PROTECTION STATUS
Back to top5.1 Designation types at national and regional level:
5.2 Relation of the described site with other sites:
Designated at national or regional level:
Type code
|
Site name
|
Type
|
Cover [%]
|
---|
BY04 | Biological Reserve "Gusak" | = | 100.00 |
Designated at international level:
Type
|
Site name
|
Type
|
Cover [%]
|
---|
Other
| Biological Reserve "Gusak" | = | 100.00 |
5.3 Site designation (optional)
Biological Reserve of Local Importance
6. SITE MANAGEMENT
6.1 Body(ies) responsible for the site management:
Organisation: | Malorita District Executive Committee |
Address: | |
Email: | malorrik@open.by |
Organisation: | SFME "Malorita Forestry" |
Address: | |
Email: | |
6.2 Management Plan(s):
An actual management plan does exist:
|
Yes
| |
| No, but in preparation |
X | No |
6.3 Conservation measures (optional)
Biological Reserve of Local Importance
7. MAP OF THE SITE
Back to topMap delivered as PDF in electronic format (optional) |
|
Yes
| |
No
|
SITE DISPLAY