Rating The Quality in Higher Education

Volume 7, Issue 12, December – 2022 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Rating the Quality in Higher Education

*Vankdoth.Praveen Kumar ** Dr Prince Bansal
Research Scholar Om Prakash Joginder Singh University OPJS University
Churu Rajasthan Churu Rajasthan
Abstract:- As a faculty of college and university in India II. UGC RULES AND SCHEMES ON QUALITY
the major components of their career advance is academic
performance it also indicates the rate of quality of higher The UGC has launched many schemes for enhancement
education. So, it has become regulation for standards in of quality education. some of the UGC schemes are
higher education. This research paper discusses the API 1.(SAP) special assistance programmer
standards of quality in higher education and weather it 2. (UPE) Universities with potential of excellence
meets all the guidelines of standards perse? Weather the 3. (CPEPA) center with potential for excellence in particular
performance of the teacher in the higher education area.
quantifiable?Weather the quality of the higher education
a static variable? As per the UGC regulation minimum The purpose of this schemes.is to development of
qualifications for appointment of academic staff in infrastructure for research. A few schemes provide grants for
university and college also maintaining standards in faculty for, development program, faculty research program,
higher education. (4th Amendment) 2016 is discussed in And for some research projects etc. All the above schemes are
this paper with respect to their question. development of the teachers in the university.
Keywords:- API, UGC Regulations, Quality Indicator, III. QUALITY EDUCATION SCHEMES SPREAD
Performance Appraisal Higher Education. AND REACH
I. QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION ONE OF Table 1: Reach of schemes of quality

THE GOALS. S.N. Name of the Number out of /Total (%)
Programme
The main issues of the higher education India has been 1 UPE 16/795; (2.01%)
approached to equality, Quality Accountability and 2 CPE 172/42338; (0.4%)
affordability. This is from very first five year plan to as late 3 CPEPA 21/795; (2.64%)
as 65th meeting of CABE in 2018, According the goal has set 4 SAP 816/ department no.
to improve the employability of youth in between age of 18- unknown
23 and increase enrollment in higher education enrollment in 5 Autonomous 602/42338; (1.42%)
higher education to 30 by 2030 and prepare 1CR Skilled man colleges
power by 2022 65th (CABE). CABE also came forward with 6 NAAC 8853/42338; (20.9)
the same plan in Xll five year plan which there is no Assessment
significant progress after completing of Xll plan period. This colleges
could be of many reasons. One of them could be filtering of 7 NAAC 413/795; (51.94)
policy from one level to another level. Assessment
Universities
This policies followed by legislative. CABE 8 Research Projects: 1737/1470000; (0.1%)
recommendations and five years plan policy are vision level Major and Mino
policy. So it is required to follow the second lager policy 9 ASC in XII Plan 2463300000/1470000(
documents.as per their requirements. The existing policy Period Rs.1675 per faculty in plan
passed by parliament at nation level is national policy of period Rs. 335 per year)
education (NPE)1986. revised in 1992. NPE suggested to
Source: UGC annual report 2016-17; NAAC annual report
prepare skills manpower at different level which includes
2018-19
research so that development can be take place University
grand commission has released few policies issues etc. with
NAAC is launched in 1994 as scheme but later in 2012
the help of (NPE) 1986. If the UGC policy is non in sync it
it became quality assurance regulation. The function of
will not get the desired result and if not implemented properly
NAAC to check the quality cell in all the university and verify
it remain exclusive.
this cell is coordinate all the activities of university and
maintain and record of individuals staff. Performance
Among all the four issues. This paper has discussed only
appraisal of each faculty. It also guide the faculty members to
about the quality of higher education.
improve activities and quality. The main role of this cell is to
upload all the university reports in their website of their plan
and development activities. As a result it helps to increase the
grade point of quality assurance this is eligible for enhanced
funding.
IJISRT22DEC369 www.ijisrt.com 666

ISSN No:-2456-2165
IV. API AS A MEASURE OF QUALITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Table 2: Comprehensiveness of API

Goal of Higher Strategies as
S no Academic performance indicators Standards
Education mentioned in NPE
1 Employability Skill based courses Category -1 Numeric value of
Updating course actual hours;, and
content, teaching number of students
and evaluation guided for M.Phil and
Category -2, Ph.D award
career counseling,
corporate linkage,
Category -3
research guidance
2 Quality Minimum NIL NIL

levels of
learning
training/ Category -2, Numeric value of

development participation on actual hours;
seminars etc. ISSN/ISBN;,
Category -3, Funding amount;,
research projects Policy document
and publications publication
Teacher
appraisal Embedded in the appraisal
Support for
research NIL NIL
Aip cover two goals of higher education REFERENCES

1.Employability
2.Quality [1]. CABE (2018), Agenda for 65th meeting, Retrieved on
18/1/18
In employability Academic performance indicators has http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/Agend
updating course content teaching and evaluation, career aHE_16012018.pdf
counseling and in standards numeric value of actual hours [2]. Economic Times (2015), Accenture To Scrape
taken Performance Reviews, 25 th July 2015
[3]. Fabrice Henard and Soleine Leprince Ringuet (2008)
In Quality as per NPE minimum level of learning, The Path to Quality Teaching in Higher Education,
Teaching Training development should be taken. For the OECD, Retrieved on 16/01/18
quality standards it required https://www1.oecd.org/edu/imhe/44150246.pdf
[4]. Gupta Veera (2013) Policy Intents and Policy
V. CONCLUSION Instruments: A Case Study of CBSE; International
Journal of Humanities and Applied Sciences (IJHAS)
As pr the discussion we can conclude that API is not a Vol. 2, No. 5, 2013 ISSN 2277 – 4386
proper method to measure quality and performance of the [5]. Noha Elassy, (2015) "The concepts of quality, quality
teacher and institute in the higher education sector in assurance and quality enhancement", Quality Assurance
india.with the support of the programmes and sectors the in Education, Vol. 23 Issue: 3, pp.250-261,
higher education are been changing fast and been well https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-11-2012-0046
equipped. As per the need. performance of the teacher is [6]. Sanjay Singh Baroniya, Sanjay Gadge, Mamta Bhoj
flexible and there is a need of relook to concept of the Baroniya and Harish Vyas (2014), Status of Academic
performance appraisal in the higher education sector. Performance Indicator (API) for College Teachers of
Madhya Pradesh: A Review, Research Journal of
Educational Sciences, Vol. 2(5), 5-13, August 2014,
ISSN 2321-0508

ISSN No:-2456-2165
[7]. Niti Aayog (2017) Sustainable Development Goals
(SDGs), Targets, CSS, Interventions, Nodal and other
Ministries, Retrieved on 19/1/2018;
http://niti.gov.in/writereaddata/files/SDGs%20V22-
Mapping_August%202017.pdf
[8]. National Policy of Education (1986) retrieved on
16/1/18 http://www.ncert.nic.in/oth_anoun/npe86.pdf
[9]. OECD (2015), OECD Regulatory Outlook
[10]. Planning Commission (2011) Twelfth Five Year Plan
http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/docum
ent-reports/XIIFYP_SocialSector.pdf
[11]. UGC (2010) Regulations on minimum qualifications for
appointment of teachers and other academic staff in
universities and colleges and measures for the
maintenance of standards in higher education, Gazzete
of India, Part III, Sector 4, (2010)
[12]. UGC (2013) Indian Higher Education: Quest for
Excellence,
https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/7580771_Flag-ship-
Programmes-of-UGC.pdf
[13]. UGC, (No date) Schemes for Quality and Excellence;
https://www.ugc.ac.in/pdfnews/3945983_Schemes-for-
Qualiy-and-Excellence.pdf
[14]. UGC (2016-17) Annual Report 2016-2017
[15]. University of Washington, Sample offer letter for
appointment, retrieved on 16/1/2018
https://admin.artsci.washington.edu/offer-letter-
sample-assistant-professor.

Rating The Quality in Higher Education

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Rating The Quality in Higher Education

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Volume 7, Issue 12, December – 2022 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology

Rating the Quality in Higher Education

I. QUALITY OF HIGHER EDUCATION ONE OF Table 1: Reach of schemes of quality

IJISRT22DEC369 www.ijisrt.com 666

Table 2: Comprehensiveness of API

2 Quality Minimum NIL NIL

training/ Category -2, Numeric value of

Aip cover two goals of higher education REFERENCES

IJISRT22DEC369 www.ijisrt.com 667

IJISRT22DEC369 www.ijisrt.com 668

You might also like