Skip to main content
Log in

Management of Appendicitis Globally Based on Income of Countries (MAGIC) Study

  • Original Scientific Report
  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Our aim is to compare the management approaches and clinical outcomes of acute appendicitis according to annual Gross National Income per Capita (GNI/Capita) of countries.

Methods

Consecutive patients who were diagnosed to have acute appendicitis from 116 centers of 44 countries were prospectively studied over a 6-month period (April–September 2016). Studied variables included demography, Alvarado score, comorbidities, radiological and surgical management, histopathology, and clinical outcome. Data were divided into three groups depending on the GNI/Capita.

Results

A total of 4271 patients having a mean (SD) age of 33.4 (17.3) years were studied. Fifty-five percent were males. Two hundred and eighty patients were from lower–middle-income (LMI) countries, 1756 were from upper–middle-income (UMI) countries, and 2235 were from high-income (HI) countries. Patients in LMI countries were significantly younger (p < 0.0001) and included more males (p < 0.0001). CT scan was done in less than 8% of cases in LMI countries, 23% in UMI countries, and 38% in HI countries. Laparoscopy was performed in 73% of the cases in the HI countries, while open appendectomy was done in more than 60% of cases in both LMI and UMI countries (p < 0.0001). The longest mean hospital stay was in the UMI group (4.84 days). There was no significant difference in the complication or death rates between the three groups. The overall death rate was 3 per 1000 patients.

Conclusions

There is great variation in the presentation, severity of disease, radiological workup, and surgical management of patients having acute appendicitis that is related to country income. A global effort is needed to address this variation. Individual socioeconomic status could be more important than global country socioeconomic status in predicting clinical outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weiser TG, Haynes AB et al (2015) Estimate of the global volume of surgery in 2012: an assessment supporting improved health outcomes. Lancet 385(Suppl 2):S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lima AP, Vieira FJ, Oliveira GP et al (2016) Clinical-epidemiological profile of acute appendicitis: retrospective analysis of 638 cases. Rev Col Bras Cir 43:248–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin KB, Chan CL, Yang NP et al (2015) Epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy for the low-income population in Taiwan, 2003–2011. BMC Gastroenterol 15:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coward S, Kareemi H, Clement F et al (2016) Incidence of appendicitis over time: a comparative analysis of an administrative healthcare database and a pathology-proven appendicitis registry. PLoS ONE 11:e0165161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD et al (2016) WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg 11:34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sartelli M, Baiocchi GL, Di Saverio S et al (2018) Prospective observational study on acute appendicitis worldwide (POSAW). World J Emerg Surg 13:19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. The World Bank, New country classifications by income level: 2017–2018. https://blogs.worldbank.org/opendata/new-country-classifications-income-level-2017-2018. Accessed 11 Dec 2017

  8. Hernandez MC, Finnesgaard E, Aho JM et al (2017) Appendicitis: rural patient status is associated with increased duration of prehospital symptoms and worse outcomes in high- and low-middle-income countries. World J Surg 42:1573–1580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4344-5 [Epub ahead of print]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Newton MF, Keirns CC, Cunningham R et al (2008) Uninsured adults presenting to US emergency departments: assumptions vs data. JAMA 300:1914–1924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Braveman P, Schaaf VM, Egerter S et al (1994) Insurance-related differences in the risk of ruptured appendix. N Engl J Med 331:444–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sutton TL, Pracht EE, Ciesla DJ (2016) Acute appendicitis: variation in outcomes by insurance status. J Surg Res 201:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zogg CK, Scott JW, Jiang W et al (2016) Differential access to care: The role of age, insurance, and income on race/ethnicity-related disparities in adult perforated appendix admission rates. Surgery 160:1145–1154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boomer L, Freeman J, Landrito E et al (2010) Perforation in adults with acute appendicitis linked to insurance status, not ethnicity. J Surg Res 163:221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gomes CA, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S et al (2015) Acute appendicitis: proposal of a new comprehensive grading system based on clinical, imaging and laparoscopic findings. World J Emerg Surg 10:60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Saverio S, Mandrioli M, Birindelli A et al (2016) Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy with a low-cost technique and surgical-glove port: “How to do it” with comparison of the outcomes and costs in a consecutive single-operator series of 45 cases. J Am Coll Surg 222:e15–e30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ukai T, Shikata S, Takeda H et al (2016) Evidence of surgical outcomes fluctuates over time: results from a cumulative meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis. BMC Gastroenterol 16:37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. GlobalSurg Collaborative (2018) Laparoscopy in management of appendicitis in high-, middle-, and low-income countries: a multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Surg Endosc Apr 5 [Epub ahead of print]

  18. Akbar F, Yousuf M, Morgan RJ, Maw A (2010) Changing management of suspected appendicitis in the laparoscopic era. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van Rossem CC, Bolmers MD, Schreinemacher MH, van Geloven AA, Bemelman WA; Snapshot Appendicitis Collaborative Study Group (2016) Prospective nationwide outcome audit of surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 103:144–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uribe-Leitz T, Jaramillo J, Maurer L et al (2016) Variability in mortality following caesarean delivery, appendectomy, and groin hernia repair in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and analysis of published data. Lancet Glob Health 4:e165–e174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Global Forum for Health Research. The10/90 Report on Health Research 2003-2004. Global Forum for Health Research, Geneva 2004. https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/17141/1090.04.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2018

  22. Lansang MA, Dennis R (2004) Building capacity in health research in the developing world. Bull World Health Organ 82:764–770

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Abu-Zidan FM, Rizk DE (2005) Research in developing countries: problems and solutions. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 16:174–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ilves I, Fagerström A, Herzig KH, Juvonen P, Miettinen P, Paajanen H (2014) Seasonal variations of acute appendicitis and nonspecific abdominal pain in Finland. World J Gastroenterol 20:4037–4042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Reinisch A, Heil J, Woeste G, Bechstein W, Liese J (2017) The meteorological influence on seasonal alterations in the course of acute appendicitis. J Surg Res 217:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baker T (2009) Critical care in low-income countries. Trop Med Int Health 14:143–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Marshall JC, Bosco L, Adhikari NK et al (2017) What is an intensive care unit? A report of the task force of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. J Crit Care 37:270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD (2010) Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet 376:1339–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CAG designed the study and wrote the manuscript. FAZ defined the research question, performed the statistical analysis, prepared the graphs and figures, wrote the results section, edited the manuscript, and addressed the concerns of the reviewers. All authors participated in the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fikri M. Abu-Zidan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gomes, C.A., Abu-Zidan, F.M., Sartelli, M. et al. Management of Appendicitis Globally Based on Income of Countries (MAGIC) Study. World J Surg 42, 3903–3910 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4736-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4736-1

Navigation