Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- Daylighting strategies are one of the most Keywords:- Educational Buildings; Draw Studios; Diva-
common aspects of architecture, but their proper use For-Rhino Simulation; Grasshopper; Daylighting;
was ignored by the designers during the implementation Sawtooth; Skylight; Deep Space; Annual Sunlight
of the educational buildings which led to the lack of Exposure; Spatial Daylight Autonomy .
distribution of Well daylit within the deep spaces. They
find a lot of spaces have many windows and the absence I. INTRODUCTION
of any external obstacles to entering the daylighting
inside the space. But it has found some areas still dark, Providing natural light in wide spaces is a crucial
generate extensive heat gain and discomfort glare design issue for creating a healthy and pleasant for an
problems and this is not accepted in IES which ensures educational environment while reducing the dependence on
visual comfort, is one of the key design goals that artificial light, hence, reducing energy consumption. In
architects and lighting designers seek; Due to the Alexandria where clear and sunny sky.
availability of cheap electricity at the time, the main
dependence on space lighting was achieved by using the The science of daylighting design is not just how to
non-regulated electricity which led to the rapid increase provide enough daylight to an occupied space, but how to
in For this purpose, especially in deep spaces which do so without any undesirable side effects. Beyond adding
asymmetric dimensional designed this paper aims to windows or skylights to space, it involves carefully
study the effect activating the use of top lighting balancing heat gain and loss, glare control, and variations in
strategies in educational establishments, especially the daylight availability. Studies have shown that good daylight
drawing rooms, which needs on the uniformity and in an educational buildings is able to create a pleasant
availability of daylight and for long periods, to maintain environment, enhance academic performance, promote
the visual comfort of the application and rationalize the better health and provide significant energy savings[1].This
use of electricity using the techniques of the daylighting is sought by many countries to preserve the rates of their
for the regular distribution of lighting. This consumption of energy, the trend towards green
investigation conducted by Generating the 3d models architecture, sustainable design and environment-friendly
and analyzing the daylighting performance conducted buildings.
through a parametric simulation approach. This
approach included two software programs which are Other studies have looked at individual preferences at
Grasshopper and Diva for Rhino. This Simulation “light quality” indicators typically derived from luminance
consisted of two phases. The first phase investigated by averages or ratios. Different daylight metrics concepts have
achieved spatial daylight autonomy by use sawtooth been proposed, such as associated to entire space areas or
systems on daylighting performance in four viewed scenes rather than individual detection points and
intermediate orientations. The second phase based on relative approaches for more complex systems.
investigated using different shading techniques on The latter helped to shift the focus back on daylight
enhancing daylighting performance and treatment of variability, not only its spatial distribution [2].
the annual sunlight exposure. Simulations were
conducted using the weather data file of Alexandria, All ways of provision of daylight like Glazed openings
Egypt. The performance assessment was based on two for windows, glazed doors, skylights and other forms of top
metrics: IES approved method -Spatial Daylight lighting, which can be referred to as "fenestration". What
Autonomy (sda) and Annual Sunlight Exposure (ASE). highly important in this process is the placement, design,
Results show that the northeast and northwest and selection of materials for fenestration. These elements
orientation for sawtooth opening with shading systems can tip the balance between a low performance and a high-
in Alexandria reached the required daylighting performance building.
performance and achieved the acceptance criteria of the
assessment metrics according to the daylighting Fenestration affects the efficiency of building energy
requirements of IES. by impacting lighting loads, cooling loads, and heating
loads. Skylights provide opportunities for natural
ventilation. This is why they must be designed to ensure a
Fig 1:- While daylighting from windows is limited to the area about 4.5 m from the outside walls, roof openings can yield uniform
lighting over unlimited areas.
More light is received via the horizontal openings than the vertical openings.
Fig 2:- The various possibilities for overhead openings for daylighting are shown
Table 1:- Shading Coefficients (SC) and Solar Heat Gain Coefficients (SHGC) for Various Shading Devices.
The goal of this paper is to improve the performance of Universities in Egypt was built with spaces
daylighting levels into a deep interior space (draw studio) by characterized by large depth to allow the exercise of
using top lighting techniques with shading systems to reach functions required courses that need large areas such as
the required visual comfort. draw studios relevant Engineering faculty; those spaces are
not reaching the minimum requirements to provide a good
educational environment as environmental criteria,
Fig. 4:- Plan and sections showing the architectural Parameters of the “Base Case”
Second phase result :As shown according to the The results of simulations for a case with a 75-degree
previous pictures, after making a comparison between the angle to the northeast and northwest , it was found that all
results of each of ASE and sDA .It was found that starting cases achieve the required level of optimum performance for
from the rate of the central opening aperture, 20% of the sda , and the annual solar exposure has closet to base case
internal lighting reaches the highest level, but the annual than case with angle 70 ,65and 60 degree but unacceptable
radiation resembles the required limit, so the sawtooth will for criteria IES ; (Fig.8)and (Fig.9)
be used to reduce the radiation percentage.
Fig. 10:- The Internal and External Louver North West at Angle 0o (Horizontal) &90 ͦ (Vertical)
Third phase result: Third phase : the graph in the less result but sDA at internal louver less than result
(Fig.10)show the result for ASE at external louvers and ASE sDA at internal louver and not achieved to the preferred
result at internal louver were Close together and achieved level.
Fig.11:- The Internal and External Louver North East at Angle 0o (Horizontal) &90 ͦ (Vertical)
(Fig.11)show A comparison between results for ASE previously for internal and external found the less value was
In the case with internal louver for sawtooth and ASE In 21.3 %; this result the same result for base case( the current
the same case but with external louver for saw tooth situation); so the shading system will be used to the side
found the result ASE for the case with internal louver was windows located in south orientation to reduce direct
closet to ASE for the base case and the sDA result for the sunlight to the selected condition(the case1 has sawtooth
same case achieved to the preferred level. When comparing and internal louver for northeast at angle 90 ͦ (vertical) with
it with the same case (internal louver at a vertical angle) but 40% central opening from total ceiling area and the case2
at the northwest, found the case at northeast has the result has sawtooth and internal louver for northwest at angle 90 ͦ
for sDA and ASE better than the case with internal louver at (vertical) with 35% central opening from total ceiling area in
a vertical angle in northwest orientation. which it is investigated accepted criteria at the angle of
louver inclination (degree) 60,65,70,75,80,85 and 90 at each
The final phase Treatment the chosen case for each orientation see (Fig.12) and (Fig.13)
orientation: after reviewing the results obtained from
IX. CONCLUSIONS After analyzing all the results for the simulations found
that: the best solutions for the current situation to improve
The research included a methodology for integrating the internal lighting and Reduce the annual sun exposure to
computational methods and performance simulation tools reach them to the acceptable level according to the
such as rhinoceroses, grasshopper and diva for rhino to acceptance criteria for IES as shown in the table 5.
ensure its ability to provide performative solutions at the
early design stages. The presented methodology can be In northeast and northwest orientation, Four cases for
applied in other cases with different characteristics to obtain each orientation with a different ratio for the area for the
efficient daylighting performance in buildings. The findings central top lighting opening to a total area of the roof and
of this thesis highlighted the importance of using the Angle for sawtooth inclination were accepted and
performance simulation tools in design as each technique achieved to acquire accepted result for sDA nearly from 90
was found to perform differently according to its % to 99% of daylit areas for more study in this research. By
parameters. Considering and testing these parameters makes using shading techniques to reduced sunlight exposure were
a real difference in the overall performance. Finally, the integrated with internal louvers which enhance daylighting
results showed the promising potential of using performance inside the space to choose the best case for
computational methods along with simulation tools. It paves each orientation was achieved to accepted criteria for
the way for more research in the area of building spatial daylight autonomy result without any increase at
performance and its relation with the design of the building. annual sunlight exposure.
REFERENCES