https://globaleducationacademy.online/eportfolios/10/Home/The_Contrary_and_Lofty_Expectations_of_Generation_Y http://loveawake.kingjaap.nl/ http://loveawake.vindsnel.eu/ http://loveawake.mijnseostartpagina.nl/ http://loveawake.startpaginago.nl/ http://loveawake.hotpagina.nl/ http://loveawake.mijncasino.com/ http://craigs.sitesoverzicht.nl/ You can get love, sex and commitment without the downside, if you are a careful guy.
Given the divorce rate, any correlation between marriage and commitment is completely nonsensical.
What do you mean by careful? Does that include telling women up front that you will never marry? And does this work as well for guys in their 20s and it does for a man in his 40s?
P.S. At the risk of repeating myself in nearly every comment thread, the divorce rate for college educated couples is 17%. So the correlation between marriage and commitment in this cohort is valid 83% of the time.
College educated children of divorce? With or without children? For first or second marriages? These data are meaningless without proper context.
I’ve been looking at a lot of data, but haven’t found it broken out to the level you describe. If you have a source, I’d love to know about it.
A loving partner. Sex. Companionship. Emotional fulfillment. Family. Children.
.
Provided that the man selects wisely.
With the exception of sex (which does not require such Herculean effort), all these things are more valued by women than by men. Last time I checked, there were no articles written by men whining about commitment-phobic women.
So why men have to do all the dirty work and pander to the whim of women who are passive and over-picky?
The male equivalent would be to ask women to be good cooks, look like a model, be loving but not dependent, adventurous in the bed but not slutty.
And when women ask “if I do this, what is it for me?”, we would answer them: