Now showing data for the 2012 election cycle for the C

Contributors 2011 - 2012

Leadership PAC: Funding Developing Leadership PAC

Top 100 contributors to Campaign Committee & Leadership PAC Combined

Top:
Rank Contributor Hires lobbyists? Lobbying firm?* Lobbyist(s) give to member? Total Individuals PACs
1 USA Rice Federation Yes Yes $27,499 $500 $26,999
2 American Bankers Assn Yes Yes $21,000 $1,000 $20,000
3 CME Group Yes Yes $20,000 $0 $20,000
3 Monsanto Co Yes Yes $20,000 $0 $20,000
5 Devon Energy Yes $18,500 $8,500 $10,000
6 Dairy Farmers of America Yes $18,000 $500 $17,500
7 National Rural Electric Cooperative Assn Yes Yes $17,500 $0 $17,500
8 National Cotton Council Yes $17,000 $0 $17,000
9 Farm Credit Council Yes $15,000 $0 $15,000
10 CropLife America Yes Yes $13,000 $0 $13,000
11 Chickasaw Nation Yes Yes $12,500 $12,500 $0
11 Farmers' Rice Cooperative $12,500 $0 $12,500
11 JPMorgan Chase & Co Yes Yes $12,500 $0 $12,500
11 National Beer Wholesalers Assn Yes $12,500 $0 $12,500
15 American Assn of Crop Insurers Yes Yes $12,000 $0 $12,000
15 Koch Industries Yes $12,000 $0 $12,000
15 Williams Companies Yes $12,000 $0 $12,000
18 American Crystal Sugar Yes $11,500 $1,500 $10,000
19 Independent Community Bankers of America Yes $11,000 $0 $11,000
19 Rain & Hail Insurance Society $11,000 $0 $11,000
21 National Pork Producers Council Yes Yes $10,500 $0 $10,500
22 Alabama Farmers Federation Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 American Peanut Shellers Assn Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 American Seniors Housing Assn Yes Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 American Veterinary Medical Assn Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 California Dairies Inc Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 Chesapeake Energy Yes Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 Deere & Co Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 Ernst & Young Yes Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 Feld Entertainment Yes $10,000 $10,000 $0
22 Land O'Lakes Yes Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 National Peanut Buying Points Assn $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 NTCA/Rural Broadband Assn $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 Seaboard Corp Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 Securities Industry & Financial Mkt Assn Yes Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
22 Texas Farm Bureau Yes $10,000 $0 $10,000
37 Syngenta Corp $9,500 $0 $9,500
38 National Council of Farmer Co-Ops Yes $9,000 $0 $9,000
38 National Turkey Federation Yes $9,000 $0 $9,000
40 Cornerstone Government Affairs Yes Yes $8,500 $8,500 $0
40 Farmer Mac $8,500 $0 $8,500
40 Florida Crystals $8,500 $7,500 $1,000
40 Honeywell International Yes Yes $8,500 $0 $8,500
40 UBS Americas $8,500 $0 $8,500
45 National Assn of Realtors Yes $8,000 $0 $8,000
45 Tyson Foods Yes $8,000 $0 $8,000
45 United Egg Assn Yes Yes $8,000 $0 $8,000
48 AT&T Inc Yes Yes $7,500 $0 $7,500
48 Bank of America Yes $7,500 $0 $7,500
48 Deloitte LLP Yes Yes $7,500 $0 $7,500
48 Goldman Sachs Yes Yes $7,500 $0 $7,500
48 National Assn of Convenience Stores Yes $7,500 $0 $7,500
48 Society of Independent Gasoline Marketers Yes Yes $7,500 $0 $7,500
48 Western Growers Assn Yes $7,500 $0 $7,500
48 Western Peanut Growers Assn Yes Yes $7,500 $0 $7,500
56 Altria Group Yes Yes $7,000 $0 $7,000
56 Cargill Inc Yes Yes $7,000 $0 $7,000
56 ConocoPhillips Yes $7,000 $0 $7,000
56 Credit Suisse Securities $7,000 $0 $7,000
56 Dean Foods Yes Yes $7,000 $0 $7,000
56 National Cattlemen's Beef Assn Yes $7,000 $0 $7,000
56 National Sorghum Producers Yes Yes $7,000 $0 $7,000
63 Diageo North America $6,812 $0 $6,812
64 Managed Funds Assn Yes Yes $6,500 $0 $6,500
65 Ecolab Inc Yes Yes $6,000 $0 $6,000
65 Exelon Corp $6,000 $0 $6,000
65 Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka $6,000 $0 $6,000
65 International Dairy Foods Assn Yes Yes $6,000 $0 $6,000
65 Lockheed Martin Yes Yes $6,000 $0 $6,000
65 National Assn of Home Builders Yes $6,000 $0 $6,000
65 Walmart Inc $6,000 $0 $6,000
72 American Institute of CPAs Yes Yes $5,500 $0 $5,500
72 HSBC North America $5,500 $0 $5,500
72 US Sugar Yes Yes $5,500 $5,500 $0
72 Williams & Jensen Yes Yes $5,500 $5,500 $0
76 Olsson, Frank & Weeda Yes Yes $5,300 $5,300 $0
77 Alabama Peanut Producers Assn $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 American Fidelity Corp Yes $5,000 $2,500 $2,500
77 American Meat Institute Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 American Sugar Cane League Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Association of Equipment Manufacturers Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Blackrock Capital Management $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Bunge North America $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Campbell Soup Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Capital One Financial Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Capitol Decisions Inc Yes Yes $5,000 $5,000 $0
77 Coca-Cola Co Yes Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Florida Sugar Cane League Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Grocery Manufacturers Assn Yes Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Hilliard Brothers of Florida $5,000 $5,000 $0
77 Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Intercontinental Exchange Inc $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 JBS USA $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Keep Our Mission PAC $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Locke Lord LLP Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Lucas Oil Products $5,000 $5,000 $0
77 McLendon Acres $5,000 $5,000 $0
77 Morgan Stanley Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 National Assn/Farm Service Agency County Employees $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 National Auto Dealers Assn Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 National Chicken Council Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 National Rural Water Assn Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 National Thoroughbred Racing Assn Yes Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 New York Life Insurance Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 New York Stock Exchange $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Publix Super Markets Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Russell Group $5,000 $5,000 $0
77 Southern Minn Beet Sugar Co-Op Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Steptoe & Johnson Yes Yes Yes $5,000 $500 $4,500
77 Texas & Southwestern Cattle Raisers $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 United Fresh Produce Assn Yes Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 US Peanut PAC $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Ward Petroleum $5,000 $5,000 $0
77 Wells Real Estate Funds $5,000 $0 $5,000
77 Weyerhaeuser Co Yes $5,000 $0 $5,000

*registrants, or active lobbying firm

These tables list the top donors to candidates in the 2011 - 2012 election cycle. The organizations themselves did not donate, rather the money came from the organizations' PACs, their individual members or employees or owners, and those individuals' immediate families. Organization totals include subsidiaries and affiliates.

Why (and How) We Use Donors' Employer/Occupation Information

Corporations themselves cannot donate to candidates at the federal level but federal candidates can get contributions from corporate PACs, employees and owners as well as their immediate families. At the state level, corporations and unions can give directly to campaigns in many jurisdictions.

Under federal law, all contributions over $200 must be itemized and the donor's occupation and employer must be requested and disclosed, if provided. State requirements related to itemization thresholds and employment disclosures vary.

Where available, OpenSecrets uses that employer/occupation information to identify the donor's economic interest. We do this in two ways:

  • First, we apply a code to the contribution, identifying the industry. Totals for industries (and larger economic sectors) can be seen in each candidate and race profile, and in the Industry Profile section of the OpenSecrets website.
  • Second, we standardize the name of the donor's employer. If enough contributions came in from people connected with that same employer, the organization's name winds up on the Top Contributors list.

It is impossible to know either the economic interest that made each individual contribution possible or the motivation for each individual giver. However, the patterns of contributions provide critical information for voters, researchers and others. That is why Congress and many states have mandated that candidates, political parties and political committees request employer information from contributors and publicly report it when the contributor provides it.

In some cases, a cluster of contributions from people associated with the same organization may indicate a concerted effort by that organization to "bundle" contributions to the candidate. In other cases, the reason for the contributions may be completely unrelated to the organization.

Showing these clusters of contributions from people associated with particular organizations provides a valuable — and unique — way of understanding where candidates are getting their financial support. Knowing those groups is also useful after the election, as issues come before Congress, presidential administrations and state governments that may affect those organizations or their industries.

METHODOLOGY

Corporations themselves cannot donate to candidates at the federal level but federal candidates can get contributions from corporate PACs, employees and owners as well as their immediate families. At the state level, corporations and unions can give directly to campaigns in many jurisdictions.

Donors who give more than $200 to any federal candidate, PAC or party committee must list their occupation and employer. State requirements related to itemization thresholds and employment disclosures vary. Based on the available information, the donor is given an economic code. These totals are conservative, as not all of the individual contributions have yet been classified by OpenSecrets.

In cases where two or more people from the same family contributed, the income-earner's occupation/employer is assigned to all non-wage earning family members. If, for instance, Henry Jones lists his employer as First National Bank, his wife Matilda lists "Homemaker" and 12-year old Tammy shows up as "Student," OpenSecrets would identify all their contributions as being related to the "First National Bank" since that's the source of the family's income.

Although individual contributions are generally categorized based on the donor's occupation/employer, in some cases individuals may be classified instead as ideological donors. A contribution to a candidate may be given an ideological code, rather than an economic code, if the contributor gives to an ideological political action committee AND the candidate has received money from PACs representing that same ideological interest.

NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for the 2011 - 2012 election cycle and based on Federal Election Commission data released electronically on March 25, 2013. ("Help! The numbers don't add up...")

WHY DON'T THE NUMBERS ADD UP?

Sometimes it's hard to make apple-to-apple comparisons across some of the pages in a candidate's profile. Here's why:

Summary numbers for federal officeholders - specifically "Total Raised and Spent" and "PAC/Individual Split" - are based on summary reports filed by the candidates with the Federal Election Commission. All other numbers in these profiles for state and federal officeholders are derived from contribution records disclosed in campaign finance reports from the FEC or state campaign finance agencies that reach applicable itemization thresholds.

There is also a time lag in posting the information. While summary numbers are reported almost immediately by the FEC — and listed quickly on OpenSecrets — processing and analyzing the detailed records takes much longer. For that reason, summary numbers are usually higher (and more current) than the numbers based on detailed records. Data for state officeholders may be subject to longer time lags, as OpenSecrets aggregates this information from many sources and formats.

HOW CURRENT ARE THESE FIGURES?

The figures in federal profiles are taken from databases uploaded by the FEC on the first day of every month. Those databases are only as current as the FEC has been able to compile by that date (see the note above about lag times for data entry).

OpenSecrets updates federal figures for "Total Raised and Spent" and for "PAC/Individual Split" a few days after the first of the month. The remaining figures - based on detailed contribution data - are updated by OpenSecrets after the 20th of every month. This gives us time to analyze the contributions and categorize them by industry and interest group.

The lag times vary for state officeholder data. OpenSecrets aggregates state data from many sources and formats.

Feel free to distribute or cite this material, but please credit OpenSecrets. For permission to reprint for commercial uses, such as textbooks, contact OpenSecrets: [email protected]