Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISSN No:-2456-2165
Abstract:- In Region XI, this study found that teamwork There have been many initiatives that have focused on
and teacher engagement had mediating roles between the importance of engagement. Engagement offers a
work condition and professional development. A sample window into how the environment affects teachers' well-
of 465 secondary teachers was used in a descriptive being at work (Cherkowski et al., 2022).According to Guhao
correlational research design. For the required data, and Quines (2021), engagement is distinct from the output;
both online and offline improved and validated survey it may be a fume but it's not a fire. Although it may increase
questionnaires were used. The gathered pieces of productivity, it is not a product, so even if teachers are
evidence were scrutinized using the Mean, Pearson-r, enthusiastic and involved, there will be no enhancement in
and Path Analysis as statistical tools with the following the outcomes without the proper leadership, tools, and other
results: level of teamwork was high, level of teacher factors. Teacher engagement is thought to be related to
engagement was high, level of work condition was high, professional consciousness (Fute et al., 2022).
and, level of professional development was high.
Moreover, results revealed a significant relationship One aspect that impacts teacher engagement is
between teamwork and teacher engagement in relation teamwork. According to Jard et al. (2022); Quines & Piero
to work condition and professional development. A (2022), teamwork fosters respect that frequently improves
mediation of teamwork and engagement in the engagement. Teacher engagement can profoundly impact
relationship between work condition and the the retention and loyalty of employees in the school
professional development of secondary teachers in organization (Al Hawamdeh, 2022).
Southern Mindanao was proven in the study. Programs
and activities that may reinforce secondary teachers Moreover, work conditions are positively linked with
about engagement, teamwork, work condition, and engagement. Teachers learn by interacting (Leite&Havu-
professional development as these are equally essential Nuutinen, 2022). Work condition favors a more excellent
variables for better teaching performances in the schools state of mind toward their work and improves their
where secondary teachers belong are some implications professional lives by fostering development between
of the study. teachers and their peers and students (Coelho et al., 2023).
The Cai et al., (2022) study disclosed that work condition
Keywords:- Educational management teamwork, teachers' provides teachers with useful resources to increase and
engagements, work conditions, professional development, develop further affiance in their toil. Resources and
mediating effect, secondary school teachers, Philippines. responsibilities create a school culture that stimulates
confidence and engagement.
I. INTRODUCTION
The study on teamwork, engagement and work
Teachers’ engagement, in whatsoever circumstance, is condition as a framework for professional development is
of crucial importance for organizations like schools. done out of the country. There hasn't been any research on
Engaged teachers must be empowered, take control over how secondary teachers' work condition and professional
events, and can actively adjust their environments to development affect teamwork and teacher engagement in
preserve their work (Van Wingerden & Poell, 2019). Region Xl. The researcher hoped to discover relevant
However, Zhao et al. (2019) pointed out that teachers are variables associated with teacher engagement in the
seen as problematic with impaired well-being, and are Philippines. It is also intended to generate desirable
linked with low levels of professional expansion and programs to support teacher engagement in professional
performance when challenged in many areas of their lives. development.
According to Fute&Oubibi (2022), engagement and mental
health are issues for China's teachers, especially during the This study identified how teamwork, teacher
pandemic. Teachers must work together in a psychologically engagement, work environment, and professional
dynamic environment if they are to remain committed and development play mediating roles in public schools.Its
resilient in their work despite challenges. specific objectives are: to identify the degree of teamwork in
terms of communication, leadership, situation monitoring,
and team structure. Secondly, to ascertain the engagement
level of teachers in terms of cognitive, emotional, social,
and psychological. Thirdly, to describe the work condition
of public secondary school teachers in terms of
Fig. 1: The Mediating Effects of Work Conditions and Professional Development on the Relationship between Teamwork and
Teachers’ Engagement
IV. RESULT
Displayed in Table 1 is the level of teamwork with a Team structure, which has a mean value of 4.35 and is
weighted mean of 4.04 with a standard deviation of 0.353, related to a study by Khan et al. (2022), found that
and a verbal interpretation of High. The results show that teamwork is increasing when supported by policies and
three out of the four indicators received a high mean value practices that challenge conventional professional
like leadership with a mean value of 3.66, situation boundaries and bring care closer to the client. This is the
monitoring with a mean value of 3.96, and communication only indicator that received a verbal interpretation of Very
with a mean value of 4.19. As intensified by Tumelius & High. When mature communication, responsible
Kuure (2022) that effective team monitoring is not simply interdependence, psychological health, shared intent, task
achieved by watching teammates doing their work. clarity, and a clear goal are present during the teaming
Monitoring joins situation awareness. Situation awareness is process, the experience can have a positive effect on a
described as having three components: gathering person's attitude toward teamwork, according to Guhao &
information; understanding what the information means, and Quines, (2021); Pisoni&Gijlers, (2020).
being able to anticipate what might happen next.
A summary of the weighted mean for each Engagement suggests a possibly fruitful route for
engagement criterion is presented in Table 2. The learning about the nature of school organization and its
descriptive interpretation of the overall weighted mean is effects on teachers' job satisfaction. (Cherkowski et al.,
High, with a standard deviation of 0.348 and a weighted 2022). According to Huang et al. (2022), increased
mean of 3.94. As supported by the study of Perera et al., engagement predicts better learning outcomes, such as the
(2021), teachers may be differentially engaged in the development of knowledge and skills through simulation
teaching environment regarding their different energetic games, which also improves a person's HOTS like problem-
investments. Such different profiles of engagement have solving, critical thinking, and creativity. The relationship
varying implications for well-being-related outcomes and between student understandings of instruction and its
can be predicted by their teaching capability beliefs. The influence on their cognitive presence is too clearly evident
following indicators of engagement are cognitive (MV = in the analysis.
4.09), emotional (MV = 4.14), social (MV = 4.04), and
psychological (MV = 3.51).
Being trusted to make sound professional decisions about instruction. 0.544 4.42 Very High
Being relied upon to make decisions about educational issues. 0.609 4.18 High
Being engaged in collaborative problem-solving in the school. 0.688 4.15 High
Being an effective leader in the school. 0.633 4.02 High
Being free to be creative in his teaching profession. 0.577 4.36 Very High
Being in control of how he uses his scheduled class time. 0.741 4.09 High
Being respected under current policies. 0.607 4.29 Very High
Being confident in my ability to do my job well. 0.541 4.50 Very High
Setting the grading and student assessment practices. 0.613 4.39 Very High
Feels that the policy directives are improving his educational system. 0.642 4.21 Very High
I and other adults in the school are encouraging students to provide 0.602 4.40 Very High
constructive feedback to others.
I and other adults in the school are often connecting what students are 0.543 4.41 Very High
learning to live outside the classroom.
I and other adults at this school are providing students with the support 0.580 4.41 Very High
they need to succeed.
0.554 4.48 Very High
I and other adults at this school are feeling responsible to help all
students achieve their full potential.
I see students come to school ready to learn. 0.668 4.18 High
I and other adults in school are expecting students to succeed. 0.532 4.52 Very High
I and the physical environment are supporting teaching and students’ 0.555 4.44 Very High
learning.
Having adequate space to work productively. 0.630 4.26 Very High
I and the school are providing sufficient access to appropriate 0.660 4.20 Very High
instructional materials.
Having the support, I need to incorporate technology into teaching 0.642 4.21 Very High
instruction.
Feeling respected by the school’s administrators. 0.659 4.26 Very High
Feeling comfortable raising issues and concerns that are important to me 0.717 4.07 High
and the administration as a whole.
Trusting that the school administrators do what they say they will do. 0.704 4.19 High
Being convinced that the school administrators support the professional 0.642 4.29 Very High
development of teachers and staff.
Seeing that support is teachers’ efforts to maintain discipline in the 0.572 4.37 Very High
classroom.
Being aware that the school administrator communicates a clear vision 0.655 4.30 Very High
for the school.
Believing that performance is assessed objectively. 0.611 4.31 Very High
Being provided with resources for professional development in the 0.694 4.12 High
school.
Considering differentiated professional development to meet the 0.594 4.29 Very High
individual needs of teachers.
Considering class sizes as reasonable such that teachers have the time 0.664 4.27 Very High
available to meet the needs of the students.
Working peacefully in the school. 0.646 4.39 Very High
Being treated with respect by the students in this school. 0.536 4.46 Very High
Seeing that bullying is a problem in this school. 1.113 3.44 High
Seeing that students are bullied in this school about their clothing or 1.158 3.12 Moderate
physical appearance.
Experiencing teachers and students alike being bullied about their 1.184 2.93 Moderate
ethnicity or minority and limitation.
Experiencing that the school administrations set high regard for the 0.641 4.31 Very High
student’s safety.
Seeing that parents and guardians support their children to achieve the 0.572 4.32 Very High
educational goals of the school safely.
With an overall weighted mean score of 4.19 and a = 4.15), being relied upon to make decisions about
standard deviation of 0.384, Table 3's level of working educational issues. (MV = 4.18), trusting that the school
conditions can be characterized as high. 28 of the variables administrators do what they say they will do (MV = 4.19), I
have the highest mean and a verbal description of Very High see students come to school ready to learn (MV = 4.18),
for the results for particular items. On the other hand, the feeling comfortable raising issues and concerns that are
items with lower means and verbal descriptions of High are: important to me and the administration as a whole (MV =
realizing that bullying is a problem in this school (MV = 4.07) and being provided with resources for professional
3.44), being able to state that the safety of the teachers in development in the school (MV= 4.12). These findings
this school is in jeopardy (MV = 3.47), acting as an effective support the study of Zhao et al., (2023)that schools, where
leader in the school (MV = 4.02), and having control over teachers ratedtheir working conditions as more satisfactory
how he uses his allotted class time (MV = 4.09), being had lower attrition rates.
engaged in collaborative problem-solving in the school (MV
Setting high expectations for myself, the students, and the school. 0.619 4.22 Very High
Enhancing what is in the curriculum guide used by the school to fit 0.597 4.22 Very High
learners’ needs.
Being aware of the school’s direction in terms of curriculum planning, 0.547 4.34 Very High
and delivery.
Incorporating new insights, knowledge, or activities for students to 0.585 4.18 High
learn.
Being equipped with the 21st skills in delivering the lessons to the 0.562 4.50 Very High
students.
Being open to any improvements and more possibilities. 0.589 4.55 Very High
Encouraging students to express their thoughts. 1.072 3.24 Moderate
Being limited in delivering the content of the curriculum. 0.544 4.42 Very High
Providing opportunities for students to reflect on what they have 0.574 4.54 Very High
learned.
Being ready to be trained. 0.607 4.38 Very High
Providing opportunities for independent or group learning to promote 0.578 4.58 Very High
depth of understanding of content.
Considering everyone’s value. 0.597 4.37 Very High
Accommodating group or subgroup differences (e.g., through individual 0.922 3.92 High
conferencing, task assignment, etc.)
Motivating the few to comply with their tasks. 0.648 4.18 High
Encouraging others to use multiple interpretations ofevents 0.919 3.84 High
Relating to a few with care. 0.563 4.29 Very High
Allowing myself to discover key ideas through structured activities 0.597 4.39 Very High
provided by the school.
Seeing events as opportunities for growth. 0.562 4.36 Very High
Employing brainstorming techniques in developing myself or with the 0.569 4.54 Very High
group.
Checking the outputs of students. 0.574 4.38 Very High
Employing brainstorming techniques in developing myself or with the 0.588 4.37 Very High
group.
Considering challenges as a burden to carry through. 1.152 3.11 Moderate
Seeking support from others in handling problems. 0.461 4.13 High
Encouraging others to explore the solutions to problems. 0.608 4.26 Very High
Engaging in problem identification and solution in the workplace. 0.651 4.13 High
Working alone to avoid problems and conflicts in the workplace. 1.043 3.17 Moderate
Working to distantiate the problem until it is solved. 0.917 3.55 High
Involving in solution-finding activities and comprehensive situation 0.631 4.02 High
articulation.
Presented in Table 4 is the level of professional most effective when targeting improving teachers’ values in
development with an overall weighted mean score of 4.12, a addition to enhancing related skills.
standard deviation of 0.3811, and a verbal interpretation of
High. For specific items’ results, 23 of the variables got the Challenges are sometimes, considered as one of the
highest means with a verbal description of Very High while burdens to carry through as brought about in one of the
13 items have the lower means and have a verbal description indicators with the lowest mean and moderate descriptive
of High. level as Alvarez, et al.,(2020) cited that teachers
encountered different personal and work-life circumstances
On the other hand, the items with the lowest means which in turn hinder their capability to engage in continuing
and have a verbal description of Moderate are: encouraging professional learning. Pursuing continuing professional
students to express their thoughts (MV = 3.24), considering development is a problem for many teachers due to personal
challenges as a burden to carry through (MV = 3.11), and or work-related uncertainties. Therefore, understanding the
working alone to avoid problems and conflicts in the teachers' perception of learning in professional development
workplace (MV = 3.17), and considering research, a is important as it will provide policymakers with an
tiresome endeavor and an expense (MV = 3.27). Bowman et alternative avenue to rethink and redesign CPD program
al., (2022) clarified that values facilitate the influence of PD offerings.
exposure for integration. It is suggested that PD may be
Contained in Table 5 are the results of the relationship (2022), the standard of teacher services can be raised by
between levels of teamwork and engagement. As noted in teamwork that emphasizes shared objectives, member
the hypothesis, the relationship was tested at a 0.05 level of engagement, valuing togetherness, communication,
significance. The overall r value of .758 with a p-value of complementarity, and sharing. The quality of teaching
<0.05 signified the rejection of the null hypothesis. It services can be enhanced by work engagement that
revealed too that all indicators of teamwork positively emphasizes work, competence, the importance of work,
correlated with engagements- team structure (r = .567), development possibilities, level of performance, and interest
leadership (r = .667), situation monitoring (r = .672), and in goals.
communication (r =.572). As stressed by Rais & Rubini,
Communication .582*
(0.000)
.706*
Overall
(0.000)
*Significant at 0.05 significance level.
Shown in Table 6 are the results of the test on the are aware of their responsibilities and roles, as well as the
relationship between teamwork and work conditions. The significance of their output being relied upon by the rest of
overall values reveal a positive and significant relationship their team, team members will be driven to share the same
between teamwork and work conditions (r = .706, p<.05). work values (Quines &Piñero, 2022).Further, for teachers in
Further, all indicators of teamwork correlate positively with this generation to lead and communicate effectively, they
work conditions, namely team structure (r = .699, p<.05), must be inclusive, exhibit sincerity, adaptability, warm
leadership (r = .474, p<.05), situation monitoring (r = .560, communication, a horizontal relationship, consistent
p<.05), and communication (r = .582, p<.05). Teamwork behavior, supportive behavior, inspiring students, problem-
allows employees to work effectively. When team members solving, and a smile.
Table 7: Significance of the Relationship between Levels of Teamwork and Professional Development
Professional Development
Teamwork
Overall
Team Structure .663*
(0.000)
Leadership .532*
(0.000)
Situation .731*
Monitoring (0.000)
Communication .803*
(0.000)
.832*
Overall
(0.000)
*Significant at 0.05 significance level.
Identified in Table 7 are the test results of the correlate positively with professional development, namely
relationship between teamwork and professional team structure (r=.663, p<.05), leadership (r=.532, p<.05),
development. As can be congregated from the hypothesis, situation monitoring (r=.731, p<.05), communication
the relationship was tested at a 0.05 level of (r=.803, p<.05).Lysberg, J. (2022) quoted that collaborative
significance.The overall values reveal a positive and efforts of teachers increase understanding which creates
significant relationship between teamwork and professional learning.
development (r=.832, p<.05). All indicators of teamwork
Table 8: Significance of the Relationship between Levels of Work Conditions and Engagements
Engagement
Work Conditions
Cognitive Emotional Social Psychological Overall
.630* .578* .651* .276* .635*
Overall
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
*Significant at 0.05 significance level.
Table 9: Significance of the Relationship between Levels of Professional Development and Engagements
Professional Engagement
Development Cognitive Emotional Social Psychological Overall
.656* .618* .637* .349* .674*
Overall
(0.000) (0.000) (0.000) (0.000) (0.000)
*Significant at 0.05 significance level.
Showcased in Table 9 is the relationship between teachers' levels of professional development positively
professional development and engagements. As shown in correlate with teachers’ engagements since the overall R-
the hypothesis section, the relationship was tested at a 0.05 value is .674 with a p-value of p<.05, rejecting the null
level of significance. The results revealed a positive and hypothesis. It goes to show that professional development
significant relationship between the indicators of would likely increase teachers’ engagement in the different
professional development and engagements, specifically, secondary schools.Li et al., (2022) quoted that teachers’
cognitive (r = .656), emotional (r = .618), social r = .637), work engagement positively projected participation in CPD.
and psychological (r = .349). The results reflect that the
Table 10: Mediating Effect: Path Analysis (Significant Partial Double Mediation)
ESTIMATES
PATH Unstandardized Standardized SE C.R. P
Using path analysis, Table 10 shows the mediating every unit increase in teamwork corresponds to a rise in
effect of TW (teamwork) on PD (professional development) engagements with a standard error of .062 and Path WC
as reflected in Table 10 which revealed a significant (work conditions) to E (engagements) manifests significant
regression with p<0.001. This path signifies that every unit regression with<0.001 which further indicates that every
rise in teamwork corresponds to a .899-unit increase in unit growth in work conditions corresponds to an increase in
professional development with a standard error of .029. Path engagements with a standard error of .039.
TW (teamwork) to WC (work conditions) revealed a
significant regression with p<0.001 which indicates that With these, the result exhibited significant partial
every unit increase in teamwork corresponds to a .768-unit double mediation among variables as supported by
increase in work conditions with a standard error of .037. Fernandez-Rio et al., (2022)thatwhether they are physically
While Path PD (professional development) to E or virtually, a team is more than just a collection of
(engagements) also shows significant regression with individuals. Learning in a group setting is a powerful tool
<0.001 indicating that every unit increase in professional for preparing teachers for the interpersonal situations in
development corresponds to a 0.113-unit increase in which they will eventually have to grow. These teachers will
engagements with a standard error of .050. Moreover, Path then instruct students who need to develop their personal
TW (teamwork) to E (engagements) demonstrates and social skills. Team learning enhances transferable
significant regression with <0.001 which further infers that abilities like leadership, teamwork, and reflection.
Fig. 2: The Mediating Effects of Work Conditions and Professional Development on the Relationship between Teamwork and
Teachers Engagement
Figure 2 shows the mediating effects of work The above results are further explained by Rais &
conditions and professional development on the relationship Rubini’s (2022) idea that the caliber of teacher services can
between teamwork and teachers’ engagement. Teamwork in be raised through teamwork that prioritizes group
terms of team structure, leadership, situation monitoring, objectives, active participation of members, togetherness,
and communication directly influenced teacher engagement. communication, complementarity, and sharing. The quality
Work conditions in terms of professionalism, teaching of teacher services can be enhanced by work engagement
instructions, school community support, and safety directly that places an emphasis on active participation in work,
influenced teacher engagement. Professional development in competence, the importance of work, development
terms of curriculum planning and delivery, accommodation opportunities, level of performance, and interest in
for individual differences, problem-solving, and teacher organizational goals. The above results affirmed the theory
strategies directly affected teacher engagement. While work of Khan on Teacher engagement that when fully
conditions and professional development doubly mediated implemented, individuals will be motivated to effectively
teacher engagement. engage themselves with the team. This theory serves as a
guiding tool for the teachers to understand fully engagement
which is truly grounded on teamwork, work condition, and
professional development.
The table above shows teamwork has a significant communication and teamwork skills are the most requested
influence on professional development with an estimated and necessary soft skills for future professionals.
value of .899, a standardized estimate of .029, and a critical
ratio of 30.953. In the same manner, teamwork to work B. Teachers’ Engagement
conditions with an estimated value of .768, a standardized Overall, there is a high level of teacher engagement. All
estimate of .037, and a critical ratio of 20.550. Teamwork metrics, including those for cognitive, emotional, social, and
shows a significant relationship to engagement with an psychological functioning, showed high ratings. These
estimated value of .512, astandardized estimate of .062, and findings imply that there is a high level of engagement
a critical ratio of 8.230. among secondary public-school teachers. This is
corroborated by Chen & Cao (2022), who quantified that a
Moreover, work conditions manifest a significant successful step-by-step plan for involving teachers at
relationship with engagement with an estimate of .173, a different stages of curriculum development is outlined to
standardized estimate of .039, and a critical ratio of 4.418. encourage holistic development in the field of professional
On the other hand, professional development shows a great practice. Cherkowski et al. (2022) quantified engagement as
probability of error in engagement with the P value of .025. a potential avenue for learning about an organization's
This implies that the P value is significant at a .01 with the character and how it affects teachers' well-being at work.
critical ratio (CR) greater than 1.96, a regression weight
when the significance is at the .05 level or better, that is, the Teachers are fully engaged in their work, have fully
estimated path perimeter is significant. Since the level of displayed their physical, emotional, and cognitive abilities,
significance is .05, thus all variables are significant. and are produced to the fullest extent without any restraint
in exhibiting their holistic abilities. Work engagement is
The results are made stronger by the analyses of the also a reflection of the person performing the task. To
study of De Simone, (2020) which proved the importance of encourage comprehensive engagement in this field of
collaborative learning in professional development professional practice, a strategy for involving teachers at
experiences. Professional development provides knowledge various stages of curriculum development is also presented
to design more effective experiences. (Kahn, 2021); (Alazmi& Al-Mahdy, 2022).