A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Climate Solutions Reviews GG19 | ||||||||
2 | You can read more about our review process here: https://climate-coordination-network.super.site/the-ccn-grant-review-process | ||||||||
3 | If your project was rejected you can provide additional information here: https://forms.gle/PuDSFNvJ5rP8caio9 | ||||||||
4 | id | Grant (title) | Is the project over 3 months old? | Is the project primarily focused on climate? | Did the project provide an update on progress and impact? | Is the project in the realm of viability? | Approval | # or Reviews | Comments |
5 | 37 | $Earth - Solarpunk Dao | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.67 | 4.33 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - I've never commented this one, but since last discussion we had on T I feel now more free. I know the founder and he seems dedicated to the project. To start, imo token projects are a no for the Climate Round, many reasons, hard to include them here. At least for this one, some impact seems it's coming after 62 000 usd raised (it's promised as a pilot round of investment) but for me what's scary is the quid pro quo. Specifically when I read that some treasury is going to other Gitcoin grantees and when I read things like onboard aligned solarpunks while creating tokens. Better fit to community, at least until we track down the CCN requirements for token based projects. R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
6 | 64 | $REGEN Tokenomics Working Group | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Regen Network R5 - R6 - R7 - |
7 | 28 | Adopt a tree | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Yes | 3 | R1 - do you follow Ayowecca Uganda? You share a similar mission and might be able to share ideas! R2 - R3 - R4 - Def need impact cert R5 - R6 - R7 - |
8 | 92 | AGRii DAO | 3.33 | 2.67 | 2.67 | 2.33 | No | 3 | R1 - R2 - It's hard to verify anything. They need to provide more info in order to be more credible. R3 - R4 - R5 - unable to identify this as a dao, socials have zero updates, website is very basic stock images R6 - R7 - |
9 | 40 | AgroforestDAO | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
10 | 9 | Alinticoin Carbon token | 4.50 | 4.50 | 2.00 | 1.00 | No | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - This project does not sound right. Claiming to produce electricity from plants. Has a token listed on exchanges. R5 - I cannot verify they are able to do what they claim. Sounds very sci fi R6 - R7 - |
11 | 117 | Alit Carbon Token | 3.00 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 1.00 | No | 2 | R1 - R2 - Double R3 - R4 - repeat from ID#9 R5 - R6 - R7 - |
12 | 47 | ALTERNUN | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | 4.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - Another token project... this one though is unique and through some complicated mechanism that I don't understand, wants to reduce gold mining activities in South America, I would give them a chance. R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
13 | 74 | Aluxes | 4.33 | 4.33 | 4.00 | 3.33 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - Lots of very interesting facts, but I am unable to identify any work they've done. It's a plan to do something R6 - R7 - |
14 | 4 | Ama Earth Group - Earth Development Company "Taking Climate Change into Our Own Hands" üî® | 5.00 | 4.33 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Good concept. Only question. I have is why the founders are not doxxed. Also shades of Community building R5 - R6 - R7 - |
15 | 48 | Astral | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
16 | 38 | Atlantis | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.33 | 3.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - I do not see proof of their green jobs claims and bounties. R6 - R7 - |
17 | 13 | Ayowecca Uganda : Training rural farmers & indigenous communities on regenerative agriculture, providing women & girls with new skills for economic empowerment and planting fruit trees in school & health centers | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
18 | 23 | B√öAN_fund | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - Will look forward to seeing how you are using impact certificates in this important work R2 - R3 - R4 - Using hypercerts.Would have loved the team to be doxxed R5 - R6 - R7 - |
19 | 65 | BaseX - universal evaluation engine. Impact. Externalities. Cobenefits. | 5.00 | 5.00 | 3.67 | 4.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - I think BaseX was in GG18? We need an update as well as examples of the viability of your work. R2 - R3 - R4 -. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
20 | 121 | BEE APICULTURE | 4.00 | 2.50 | 3.50 | 3.50 | No | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - need to make the link between bee keeping and GHG reduction. Application has made an indirect link but while this is a super awesome project, this is the climate round and the funds needs to go directly to climate change related activities (Carbon (GHG) reduction). There needs to be one more step thought out (ie what exactly the bees are pollinating - ie types of crops etc) for this to be directly related to climate change. It shouldn't be..."this is what can happen" but instead should be "this is how we are making it happen" R4 - Project is at planning stage. Primary focus is bee keeping. Needs to specify how they will measure impact of this particular project ( metrics they will track ) R5 - R6 - R7 - |
21 | 17 | BETTER | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
22 | 95 | Beyond Fossil Fuels - Supporting Indigenous legal efforts to STOP fossil fuel infrastructure | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.67 | 4.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - Meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
23 | 70 | Bloom Network | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
24 | 0 | Carbon Anti-Theft | 5.00 | 4.75 | 3.00 | 3.75 | Yes | 4 | R1 - R2 - This is a small project, that got little funding and the person behind it is still pushing it because they* believe in it. I can't understand the Realm of Viability of it but I don't see any other reasons on why we should not include it. R3 - R4 - This project does not have impact even after 36 months of development. Hypercert should be made compulsory. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
25 | 18 | City Farmers | 5.00 | 3.67 | 4.33 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - Should explain their climate connection better R4 - Interesting project but not framed in the Climate Solutions requirement. No mention of how will track the GHG reductions ( carbon sequestration ) R5 - R6 - R7 - |
26 | 97 | Climate Emergency Centers | 5.00 | 5.00 | 2.67 | 4.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - Some climate activists! No update, but they seem active on the ground R3 - where is their update? R4 - R5 - meets criteria as climate activists, application coukd have been better R6 - R7 - |
27 | 71 | Climate Fest | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - This is more suited for Community round. Proposing to a Climate event and then plant trees from proceeds R5 - R6 - R7 - |
28 | 42 | Climate Solutions Round | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | No | 2 | R1 - R2 - cute cat R3 - R4 - Pls omit. This was a test grant made for the video R5 - SPAM R6 - R7 - |
29 | 77 | Closer | 4.67 | 4.33 | 3.00 | 3.00 | No | 3 | R1 - R2 - This looks like it's linked to the traditional dream factory, it's an quoting ''operating system for regenerative communities '' R3 - R4 - R5 - I'm unable to identify their work from the information provided R6 - R7 - |
30 | 73 | Coffee Impact Collective | 4.33 | 4.33 | 3.67 | 3.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - no proof of their work. Twitter is all retweets R6 - R7 - |
31 | 5 | Collabin ID: Learn And Plant - Web3 Climate Action | 5.00 | 1.67 | 2.33 | 3.33 | No | 3 | R1 - From Twitter & Website this project seems more like a Community & Web3 round project that is just starting a new Climate Solutions initiative. Perhaps apply to Comm&Ed for GG19 and then apply to a future Climate Solutions Round when you have taken some clear action steps. R2 - R3 - R4 - More suitable for web3 education and community R5 - R6 - R7 - |
32 | 75 | CometDaox | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | No | 2 | R1 - R2 - I am unable to ascertain what exactly it is that they do when it comes to climate. They say they are an investment fund and that they invest in climate projects. What climate projects? I see no evidence of anything they are talking about. R4 - Write up says project is an investment fund. Twitter talks about meme coins. Red Flags R5 - R6 - R7 - |
33 | 123 | Coral Connect | 4.67 | 4.67 | 4.33 | 4.33 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - Ok but really stretched. R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
34 | 6 | Cosmos for Humanity | C4H | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4.5 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
35 | 57 | Crypto Whales NFT by Highly Artistic | 5.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
36 | 124 | Crystaltrade | 4.67 | 4.67 | 3.67 | 3.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - The Grant application is empty, website is basically a Calendy, nope for me R3 - R4 - dMRV solution for. Biochar R5 - R6 - R7 - |
37 | 41 | Decentralized Library | 2.33 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | No | 3 | R1 - Not primarily focused on climate solutions and also no evidence that this decentralized library exists: can't find website or link. R2 - R3 - Not climate focused R4 - R5 - does not meet criteria R6 - R7 - |
38 | 12 | DeFood: Decentralized Food Security Network (DFSN) | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
39 | 76 | dMeter EBF Hypercert | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
40 | 96 | Drylands Agroecology Research (DAR) | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - More project like this one, moreee! R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
41 | 19 | Ecofrontiers: Crypto Natural Capital Aggregator | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.33 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Solid team / Curve labs - Started off as an advocay platform - now. buidling a discovery app for climate projects R5 - R6 - R7 - |
42 | 46 | ECORISE | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Continuing project - fits the criteria R5 - R6 - R7 - |
43 | 34 | EcoSynthesisX | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - fits the criteria R5 - R6 - R7 - |
44 | 112 | EkoDoku - Ethical Silk Production | 5.00 | 3.50 | 3.50 | 4.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - Not primarly focused on Climate, this one should be in community just by looking at their impact metrics R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
45 | 31 | Ekonavi | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
46 | 111 | Elephant in the Room Strategic Climate Solutions | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
47 | 55 | Endangered Tokens DAO: Endangered Trees as ReFi Biodiversity Assets & Public Registry | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - fits the criteria and has been participating in earlier rounds R5 - R6 - R7 - |
48 | 101 | EverGreenCoin® | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 4.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 -this is a 92 months token project, unsure. R3 - R4 - R5 - Meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
49 | 116 | ExoSmart: Pioneering Sustainable Agriculture | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 1 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Rewards for contributors are mentioned ( should be avoided as quid pro quo is prohibited. ) R5 - R6 - R7 - |
50 | 61 | Fightersgang | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.25 | 3.00 | No | 4 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - unable to identidy their impact R6 - R7 - not directly working on solutions, just giving a percentage of funds to others |
51 | 1 | Fork Forest | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | Yes | 4 | R1 - R2 - Is this linked to Ekonavi? That's what I read in the update. Fork Forest---Fork DAO, Ekonavi, GainForestNow. Reaching out now R3 - R4 - Using Gainforest for GHG tracking. Must use Hypercerts R5 - R6 - R7 - |
52 | 16 | Fundación Salva Terra | 5.00 | 4.33 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Mostly focusing on planting trees and onboarding farmers to web3 and better ag practices R5 - R6 - R7 - |
53 | 2 | Gaia | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.25 | 4.50 | Yes | 4 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - No actual impact todate. They will use the money raaised to create a liquidity pool. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
54 | 63 | GainForest: A global conservation basic income enabled by AI and web3 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Past grantee / Xprize finals coming up R5 - R6 - R7 - |
55 | 86 | Green Digital Guardians | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - Fits the criteria R6 - R7 - |
56 | 32 | Green Planet Conservation Initiative | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
57 | 52 | GreenPill Ottawa x Rooted LABs: Climate, Agriculture, Open Source Tooling | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
58 | 125 | GreenWorld | 5.00 | 3.67 | 4.67 | 3.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - Yep, proofs are in their social media R3 - R4 - This is more suited to the Web3 education and community round as the mission is to "to create the biggest community . . . . " R5 - R6 - R7 - |
59 | 105 | Growth&Griders | 2.75 | 2.25 | 1.75 | 2.75 | No | 4 | R1 - R2 - No from me. Broken links on the website, one post on Twitter, grant seems full of ChatGpt nonsense stuff. R3 - Not sure how real this feels R4 - R5 - Does not look like a real projects. GH has very basic commits, socials don't show any work, created recently R6 - The webpage was created 1 week ago. Maybe apply next round. R7 - |
60 | 10 | Helios - High Impact Solar in Emerging Markets | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
61 | 114 | impactMarket: Financial education & microcredit to vulnerable communities. | 5.00 | 3.00 | 3.50 | 4.50 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - imo not primarly climate R3 - R4 - Love this idea of Conservation Basic Income. Will need more of an update on real-world examples for the next round's reviews. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
62 | 115 | Jerri.wtf | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
63 | 25 | Joy's Kitchen - Food Rescue | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Great project. We need to work with them to calculate GHG redn due to the project. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
64 | 72 | KOKO DAO saving forests in Colombia | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
65 | 88 | Kokonut Network; Perpetual Value Ecosystem | 5.00 | 3.33 | 4.67 | 4.33 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - Are monoculture plantations welcome in our round? Always found the project interesting and Wasabi is known in the space, I'm just wondering how climate is this <<V1 Plantation consists of 60,000 coconut plants, We will produce and sell coconuts, as well as create products such as coconut milk, water, pulp, and cosmetics for both retail and wholesale markets.>> R3 - I am not totally convinced that this is primarily a climate project. They talk a tiny bit about carbon sequestration of coconut trees but these trees are not particularly good sequesterers...I think it is a worthy project for many reasons - just not sure about the climate implications. Would like to see the research R4 - R5 - fits the criteria R6 - R7 - |
66 | 62 | Kula Earth Regenerative Commons | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Fits the criteria and is a past grantee R5 - R6 - R7 - |
67 | 87 | La Madriguera | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - Fits the criteria R6 - R7 - |
68 | 3 | Litter Token | 5.00 | 4.67 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Yay - used hypercert! R5 - R6 - R7 - |
69 | 119 | LunarPunk_Labs | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - Hard to say if they are primarly climate. I met both Rishi and Josh IRL in India, they seemed good guys and very advanced nerds. Couldn't understand 50% of what they were talking about R3 - R4 - I know the person and hence abstaining R5 - R6 - Not clear how this is primarily a climate solution. That said, they were in the bundle. Will look to see a significant climate related updated in future rounds. R7 - |
70 | 21 | LunCo - collaborative engineering | 5.00 | 1.00 | 4.33 | 4.33 | No | 3 | R1 - This project is an OSS project and is not primarily focused on Climate Solutions. R2 - R3 - R4 - Need to rechk fit with Climate R5 - R6 - R7 - |
71 | 60 | MesoReefDAO - Regenerating Reef Conservation with DeSci Web3 tools | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
72 | 106 | Mi Costa De Oro, Autonomous and Regenerative Community Rooted in Action (Venezuela) | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
73 | 45 | Mycelia - Retornando à Mãe Terra | 5.00 | 3.50 | 5.00 | 4.50 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - I continue to be on the fence about this project being in the climate round. While it is a fantastic project, the question is: Is it PRIMARILY focused on climate change? it is a project about decolonization and one woman's work in that area which does feed in to climate change but it is not directly involved in climate work or primarily involved in climate work. In GG18 this went the community round and as they are trying to use technology to enhance decolonization goals that seems like a fantastic place for it to be. I would support it in the community round or like to hear more about the climate connection R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
74 | 78 | Nawonmesh - Regenerating Buxar (Bihar, India) | 3.33 | 3.67 | 3.00 | 2.67 | No | 3 | R1 - R2 - I think they are serious, but they need to provide proofs. It's true that they got only 300 usd from the previous round, but atm it's hard to verify anything R3 - R4 - Great localized project R5 - The project does not share any proof of their work, only updates with AI, based on my personal experience - find it hard to believe they do the onboarding they claim R6 - R7 - |
75 | 54 | Next Generation Probiotics for Green Agriculture. | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 3.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Has been in an earlier round. Tempted to accept. But have concerns with genomics as well as the experimental nature of the solution R5 - R6 - R7 - |
76 | 104 | NFP (Non-Fungible Plants) | 5.00 | 4.33 | 4.00 | 4.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - I remember this one. Not sure on any impact done so far but it's a grant I would love to see in the round. R3 - R4 - R5 - it's cool, data focused, meets round criteria R6 - R7 - |
77 | 118 | Nunu Spirits | 5.00 | 1.50 | 3.00 | 3.50 | No | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - Raised 1.7 million and only planted 20,000 trees R4 - Raised 1.7 mil from token sales. Advanced project. No Direct climate action. The game is to "grant them(users) the ability to make a direct impact in regenerative initiatives starting with the planting of trees. Hence more education and community oriented. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
78 | 39 | Ocean Sole | 5.00 | 4.67 | 4.67 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - meets the criteria R6 - R7 - |
79 | 53 | ONCE - the metamodern media venture studio | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1.5 | No | 2 | R1 - Need evidence of the fact this is really a climate solution and examples of work completed R2 - R3 - R4 - The grant application is a word salad. Not sure what work is being proposed R5 - R6 - R7 - |
80 | 90 | OpenCampusDAO: Decentralized-CosmoLocal, Regenerative LivingLabs and Scientific Production Spaces | 4.67 | 4.33 | 4.67 | 4.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Great Project but may be more suited for community round. Check usage of. fundraise R5 - Very interesting project. R6 - R7 - |
81 | 91 | OxyDjinn | 3.33 | 2.67 | 3.00 | 2.33 | No | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - repo is empty, twitter is al retweets, not showing any work referenced on the application R6 - R7 - |
82 | 56 | Oxygenchain | 5.00 | 4.50 | 4.50 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Fits the criteria. However - we should push to hypercerts. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
83 | 8 | Pairwise: Simplifying Choices, Amplifying Voices | 4.75 | 1.75 | 1.25 | 3.50 | No | 4 | R1 - Valuable solution from General Magic but not primarily focused on Climate. Good for another round like Community & Ed, etc. R2 - R3 - Not climate focused R4 - This does not have a primary climate focus. Very well written grant proposal otherwwise. From General Magic R5 - not climate R6 - R7 - |
84 | 102 | Paradox Ventures | 4.00 | 1.67 | 2.00 | 2.00 | No | 3 | R1 - R2 - This is an investment program created by lawyers from South America, not sure why they applied to the Climate Round o.O R3 - Where's the climate? This doen't belong in the climate round R4 - R5 - not climate related, does not meet criteria R6 - R7 - |
85 | 126 | Parisii | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 3.50 | No | 2 | R1 - R2 - Another coin, this one seems very serious with patent, research etc. Coins are a no for me, they should be in other rounds. No direct impact on the horizon imo R3 - R4 - Project is developing "stable, synthetic asset specifically tailored to be a sustainable stablecoin" R5 - R6 - R7 - |
86 | 67 | Pollen Buzz Initiative | 5.00 | 2.50 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - I love this project so much and want to support it but it really is not primarily or even tangentally about climate. I wonder if there is some other aspects of bee keeping that could be tied to climate in their work...soil sequestration for example. R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
87 | 59 | PROJECT FOR ECO – RESTORATION AND WOMEN EMPOWERMENT THROUGH SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT | 5.00 | 4.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Project from India. Would like to take in but - team not doxxed, unclear as to how climate action + seems more towards community R5 - R6 - R7 - |
88 | 109 | Proof of Renewable Energy Production (PREPchain) | 5.00 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 3.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - not sure about this one R3 - I think this is a good idea - I am just not sure that it is in the realm of viability R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
89 | 15 | R3COLECTA | 2.666666667 | 3.666666667 | 4.666666667 | 4.333333333 | No | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - not sure how old this is R4 - Project seems to be less than 3 months old. Also not doxxed. Refers to a large body of work done but do not have any way to check R5 - R6 - R7 - |
90 | 27 | R3WILD | 5.00 | 4.33 | 4.33 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - They have provided updates and I am sure it is a great project but the reporting seems vague. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
91 | 35 | Realtime Climate Data Market (RealClime) | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - fits the criteria - enables Climateaction R5 - R6 - R7 - |
92 | 24 | Rebioca | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Project on Celo with doxxed team using hypercert and IOT sensor data. R5 - R6 - R7 - |
93 | 30 | ReCommon | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
94 | 33 | ReFi Colombia | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |
95 | 98 | ReFi EBF - Activating the Ecological Benefits Framework üêâ | 5.00 | 4.67 | 4.33 | 4.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Great project but it is essentially a framework - Question is whether it is a fit for the Climate round? R5 - R6 - R7 - |
96 | 14 | ReFi Medellín - Join the movement towards a more sustainable and equitable future in Medellín, Colombia | 5.00 | 2.33 | 5.00 | 3.33 | No | 3 | R1 - R2 - Does this belong in the community round instead? R4 - This is a WEb3 education and community building. Different from ReFi Tanzania as Tanzania is building infra while this is only community R5 - R6 - R7 - |
97 | 58 | refi node ile-ife Nigeria | 5.00 | 2.00 | 3.00 | 4.50 | No | 2 | R1 - No website or Twitter posts that show climate solution focus or action. Maybe more suited for Community & Ed round R2 - R3 - R4 - Seems more suited for community round R5 - R6 - R7 - |
98 | 11 | ReFi Tanzania | 5.00 | 4.33 | 5.00 | 4.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - Build infra for waste thereby reducing GHG. However large elements of community building R5 - R6 - R7 - |
99 | 122 | Regen Tribe | 5.00 | 2.00 | 5.00 | 4.67 | Yes | 3 | R1 - R2 - I met them at RU Berlin, they are active and building but I think it's more community. Vibe is similar to Regens Unite, the main difference is that RU organizes events, Regen Tribe not really R3 - Primarily climate? R4 - Primary focus is regenerative neighbourhoods. Needs to specify how they will measure impact of this project ( metrics they will track as they relate to Climate action) R5 - R6 - R7 - |
100 | 49 | RegenBuild üè° | 5.00 | 5.00 | 4.50 | 5.00 | Yes | 2 | R1 - R2 - R3 - R4 - R5 - R6 - R7 - |